Chao Wang
ABSTRACT
It appears that autonomous systems are replacing human in the driving task. However, autonomous driving abilities do not mean that vehicles should not interact with their drivers/passengers or their environment anymore. There are still many scenarios where either the automated system cannot handle the driving very well, or human wants to spontaneously influence the behavior of the system to meet their preferences. Thus, beyond the hype of autonomous driving, a large space opens for human-vehicle cooperation at a different level of automated driving. As this topic draws more attention both by academia and industry, we organize this workshop to in-depth identify potential research opportunities of it under the latest technology of automated driving. In this workshop, participants will discuss the motivations of driver/passenger’s intervention, generate the use cases of cooperative driving, and explore means of cooperation and interaction that human and vehicle would exchange intent smoothly. It is expected that the workshop will consolidate existing knowledge of human-vehicle-environment cooperation and provide insight for future works.
- Klaus Christoffersen and David D. Woods. 2002. How to make automated systems team players. In Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research. Vol. 2. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3601(02)02003-9Google Scholar
- Frank O Flemisch, Catherine A Adams, Sheila R Conway, Ken H Goodrich, Michael T Palmer, and Paul C Schutte. 2003. The H-Metaphor as a guideline for vehicle automation and interaction. (2003).Google Scholar
- Tom M Gasser and Daniel Westhoff. 2012. BASt-study: Definitions of automation and legal issues in Germany. In Proceedings of the 2012 road vehicle automation workshop. Automation Workshop.Google Scholar
- Frédéric Holzmann, Frank O Flemisch, Roland Siegwart, and Heiner Bubb. 2006. From aviation down to vehicles-integration of a motions-envelope as safety technology. Technical Report.Google Scholar
- Peter Moertl. 2020. Human-Systems Integration for Driving Automation Systems: Holistic Approach for Driver Role Integration and Automation Allocation for European Mobility Needs. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 78–88.Google Scholar
- Maximilian Naumann, Fabian Poggenhans, Martin Lauer, and Christoph Stiller. 2018. Coincar-sim: An open-source simulation framework for cooperatively interacting automobiles. In 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, 1–6.Google ScholarDigital Library
- SAE. 2021. Automated Driving - Levels of Driving Automation Are Defined in New Sae International Standard J3016. https://doi.org/P141661Google Scholar
- Wilbert Tabone, Joost de Winter, Claudia Ackermann, Jonas Bärgman, Martin Baumann, Shuchisnigdha Deb, Colleen Emmenegger, Azra Habibovic, Marjan Hagenzieker, P. A. Hancock, Riender Happee, Josef Krems, John D. Lee, Marieke Martens, Natasha Merat, Don Norman, Thomas B. Sheridan, and Neville A. Stanton. 2021. Vulnerable road users and the coming wave of automated vehicles: Expert perspectives. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 9, October 2020(2021), 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100293Google Scholar
- Marcel Walch, Marcel Woide, Kristin Mühl, Martin Baumann, and Michael Weber. 2019. Cooperative overtaking: Overcoming automated vehicles’ obstructed sensor range via driver help. In Proceedings - 11th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2019. 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344531Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chao Wang. 2019. A framework of the non-critical spontaneous intervention in highly automated driving scenarios. In Adjunct Proceedings - 11th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2019. 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351326Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chao Wang, Matti Krüger, and Christiane B. Wiebel-Herboth. 2020. ”Watch out!”: Prediction-Level Intervention for Automated. In Proceedings - 12th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2020. 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410652Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chao Wang, Thomas H Weisswange, Matti Krueger, and Christiane B Wiebel-Herboth. 2021. Human-Vehicle Cooperation on Prediction-Level: Enhancing Automated Driving with Human Foresight. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.03019(2021).Google Scholar
- Gesa Wiegand, Kai Holländer, Katharina Rupp, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2020. The Joy of Collaborating with Highly Automated Vehicles. Proceedings - 12th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2020 (2020), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410643Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Designing for Prediction-Level Collaboration Between a Human Driver and an Automated Driving System
AutomotiveUI '21 Adjunct: 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsAlthough automated driving (AD) systems progress fast in recent years, there are still various corner cases that such systems cannot handle well especially for predicting the behavior of surrounding traffic. This may result in discomfort or even ...
Lane Change Decision Making for Automated Driving
HRI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionFor the success of automated vehicles, in addition to legal, safety, and technical aspects, user acceptance and trust in automation systems are considered to have a significant impact. The driving style can decisively influence these factors. Besides ...
Manual takeover after highly automated driving: Influence of budget time and Lane Change Assist on takeover performance
ECCE '21: Proceedings of the 32nd European Conference on Cognitive ErgonomicsThe current study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of additional assistance system to support driver performance during a takeover request in a conditionally automated vehicle, that is, Level 3 of SAE taxonomy. Seventy drivers participated in ...
Comments