skip to main content
10.1145/3473682.3480261acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

What does Well-Designed Adaptivity Mean for Drivers? A Research Approach to Develop Recommendations for Adaptive In-Vehicle User Interfaces that are Understandable, Transparent and Controllable

Published: 22 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Applications of our everyday devices like smartphones and computers are becoming increasingly smart, adaptive, and personalized. We assume that users will soon expect the same behavior from their cars. Research shows that well-designed adaptivity brings the potential to increase a system's usability and thereby offer a safer driver-vehicle interaction. While car manufacturers already present first interaction concepts, there still seems to be a research gap regarding human factors challenges of adaptivity. In this paper, we will present some of these challenges and explain their relevance within the automotive context. Additionally, we present our research approach for developing recommendations for the design of adaptive user interfaces for in-vehicle comfort and infotainment features.

References

[1]
Ashraf Abdul, Jo Vermeulen, Danding Wang, Brian Y. Lim, and Mohan Kankanhalli. 2018. Trends and Trajectories for Explainable, Accountable and Intelligible Systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-18. DOI=10.1145/3173574.3174156.
[2]
Evgeni Aizenberg and Jeroen van den Hoven. 2020. Designing for human rights in AI. Big Data & Society 7, 2.
[3]
Victor Alvarez-Cortes, Victor H. Zárate, Jorge A. Ramirez Uresti, and Benjamin E. Zayas. 2009. Current Challenges and Applications for Adaptive User Interfaces. In Human-Computer Interaction, I. Maurtua, Ed. InTech. DOI=10.5772/7745.
[4]
Angelos Amditis, Luisa Andreone, Aris Polychronopoulos, and Johan Engström. 2005. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADAPTIVE INTEGRATED DRIVER-VEHICLE INTERFACE: OVERVIEW OF THE AIDE PROJECT. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 38, 1, 103-108.
[5]
Saleema Amershi, Dan Weld, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Adam Fourney, Besmira Nushi, Penny Collisson, Jina Suh, Shamsi Iqbal, Paul N. Bennett, Kori Inkpen, Jaime Teevan, Ruth Kikin-Gil, and Eric Horvitz. 2019. Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-13. DOI=10.1145/3290605.3300233.
[6]
Apple Inc. 2021. Human Interface Guidelines - Machine Learning. Retrieved June 18, 2021 from https://​developer.apple.com​/​design/​human-interface-guidelines/​machine-learning/​overview/​introduction/​
[7]
BMW Group 2021. Das neue BMW iDrive. Retrieved June 18, 2021 from https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/deutschland/article/detail/ T0327315DE/das-neue-bmw-idrive?language=de
[8]
Amira Dhouib, Abdelwaheb Trabelsi, Christophe Kolski, and Mahmoud Neji. 2016. A classification and comparison of usability evaluation methods for interactive adaptive systems. In 2016 9th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI). IEEE, 246-251. DOI=10.1109/HSI.2016.7529639.
[9]
Berkeley J. Dietvorst, Joseph P. Simmons, and Cade Massey. 2015. Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of experimental psychology. General 144, 1, 114-126.
[10]
Michael C. Dorneich, Kellie A. McGrath, Rachel F. Dudley, and Max D. Morris. 2013. Analysis of the Characteristics of Adaptive Systems. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. IEEE, 888-893. DOI=10.1109/SMC.2013.156.
[11]
Mica R. Endsley. 2017. From Here to Autonomy. Human factors 59, 1, 5-27.
[12]
Karen M. Feigh, Michael C. Dorneich, and Caroline C. Hayes. 2012. Toward a characterization of adaptive systems: a framework for researchers and system designers. Human factors 54, 6, 1008-1024.
[13]
Google PAIR. 2019. People + AI Guidebook. Retrieved April 20, 2021 from https://​pair.withgoogle.com​/​guidebook/
[14]
Thilo Hagendorff and Katharina Wezel. 2020. 15 challenges for AI: or what AI (currently) can't do. AI & Soc 35, 2, 355-365.
[15]
Melanie Hartmann. 2009. Challenges in Developing User-Adaptive Intelligent User Interfaces. In 17th Workshop on Adaptivity and User Modeling in Interactive Systems, D. Hauger, M. Köck and A. Nauerz, Eds.
[16]
Kristina Höök. 1999. Designing and evaluating intelligent user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces - IUI '99. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 5-6. DOI=10.1145/291080.291082.
[17]
Eric Horvitz. 1999. Uncertainty, Action, and Interaction: In Pursuit of Mixed-Initiative Computing. Intelligent Systems, 17-20.
[18]
ISO. 2020. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 110: Interaction principles, 9241-110.
[19]
ISO. 2020. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems, 9241-210.
[20]
Anthony Jameson and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. 2012. Systems That Adapt to Their Users. In The human-computer interaction handbook. Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications, J. A. Jacko, Ed. Human factors and ergonomics. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 431-455.
[21]
Holger Kussmann, Holger Modler, Johan Engstrom, Anders Agnvall, Paul Piamonte, Gustav Markkula's, Angelos Amditis, Anastasia Bolovinou, Luisa Andreone, Enrica Deregibus, Paul Kompfner, Patrick Robertson, Nuria de Miguel Garcia, Stephane Feron, Harald Berninger, Christophe Couvreur, Thierry Bellet, Johan Scholliers, and Matti Kutila. 2004. Requirements for AIDE HMI and safety functions D3.2.1.
[22]
Henry Lieberman. 2010. User Interface Goals, AI Opportunities. AIMag 30, 4, 16.
[23]
Mark Maybury. 1999. Intelligent user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces - IUI '99. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 3-4. DOI=10.1145/291080.291081.
[24]
Jacob Nielsen. 1994. 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. Retrieved June 21, 2021 from https://​www.nngroup.com​/​articles/​ten-usability-heuristics/​
[25]
Lena Rittger, Doreen Engelhardt, Oliver Stauch, and Ivo Muth. 2020. Adaptive User Experience und empathische HMI-Konzepte. ATZ 122, 16-21.
[26]
SAE International/ISO. 2021. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, J3016.
[27]
Donghee Shin. 2021. The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 146.
[28]
Ben Shneiderman. 1997. Direct manipulation for comprehensible, predictable and controllable user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Intelligent user interfaces - IUI '97. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 33-39. DOI=10.1145/238218.238281.
[29]
Ben Shneiderman. 2020. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 36, 6, 495-504.
[30]
Ben Shneiderman, Catherine Plaisant, Maxine S. Cohen, Steven M. Jacobs, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2016. The Eight Golden Rules of Interface Design. Retrieved June 21, 2021 from https://​www.cs.umd.edu​/​users/​ben/​goldenrules.html
[31]
Simone Stumpf, Erin Sullivan, Erin Fitzhenry, Ian Oberst, Weng-Keen Wong, and Margaret Burnett, XXStumpf, S., Sullivan, E., Fitzhenry, E., Oberst, I., Wong, W.-K., and Burnett, M. 2008. Integrating rich user feedback into intelligent user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces - IUI '08. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 50. DOI=10.1145/1378773.1378781.
[32]
Hariharan Subramonyam, Colleen Seifert, and Eytan Adar. 2021. ProtoAI: Model-Informed Prototyping for AI-Powered Interfaces. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 48-58. DOI=10.1145/3397481.3450640.
[33]
Patrick Tchankue, Janet Wesson, and Dieter Vogts. 2011. The impact of an adaptive user interface on reducing driver distraction. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '11. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 87. DOI=10.1145/2381416.2381430.
[34]
Alexander Trende, Daniela Gräfing, and Lars Weber. 2019. Personalized user profiles for autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 287-291. DOI=10.1145/3349263.3351315.
[35]
Sarah Theres Völkel, Christina Schneegass, Malin Eiband, and Daniel Buschek. 2020. What is "intelligent" in intelligent user interfaces? In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 477-487. DOI=10.1145/3377325.3377500.
[36]
Marcel Walch, David Lehr, Mark Colley, and Michael Weber. 2019. Don't you see them? In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 232-237. DOI=10.1145/3349263.3351338.
[37]
Nadine Walter. 2018. Personalization and context-sensitive user interaction of in-vehicle infotainment systems. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Munich.
[38]
Philipp Wintersberger, Hannah Nicklas, Thomas Martlbauer, Stephan Hammer, and Andreas Riener. 2020. Explainable Automation: Personalized and Adaptive UIs to Foster Trust and Understanding of Driving Automation Systems. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 252-261. DOI=10.1145/3409120.3410659.
[39]
Austin Wright, Zijie Wang, Haekyu Park, Grace Guo, Fabian Sperrle, Mennatallah El-Assady, Alex Endert, Daniel Keim, Duen Horng Chau. 2020. A Comparative Analysis of Industry Human-AI Interaction Guidelines. ArXiv, abs/2010.11761.
[40]
Qian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn Rosé, and John Zimmerman. 2020. Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-13. DOI=10.1145/3313831.3376301.
[41]
Yunfeng Zhang, Q. Vera Liao, and Rachel K. E. Bellamy. 2020. Effect of confidence and explanation on accuracy and trust calibration in AI-assisted decision making. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 295-305. DOI=10.1145/3351095.3372852.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Adaptivity as a key feature of mobile maps in the digital eraFrontiers in Communication10.3389/fcomm.2023.12588518Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Evaluating the Potential of Interactivity in Explanations for User-Adaptive In-Vehicle Systems – Insights from a Real-World Driving StudyHCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers10.1007/978-3-031-48047-8_19(294-312)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Artificial Intelligence for Adaptive, Responsive, and Level-Compliant Interaction in the Vehicle of the Future (KARLI)HCI International 2022 Posters10.1007/978-3-031-06394-7_23(164-171)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2022
  1. What does Well-Designed Adaptivity Mean for Drivers? A Research Approach to Develop Recommendations for Adaptive In-Vehicle User Interfaces that are Understandable, Transparent and Controllable

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      AutomotiveUI '21 Adjunct: 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
      September 2021
      234 pages
      ISBN:9781450386418
      DOI:10.1145/3473682
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 22 September 2021

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Adaptive Human-Machine Interaction
      2. Adaptive User Interface
      3. Human-AI Interaction
      4. Personalization

      Qualifiers

      • Work in progress
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      AutomotiveUI '21
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

      Upcoming Conference

      AutomotiveUI '25

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)87
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 22 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Adaptivity as a key feature of mobile maps in the digital eraFrontiers in Communication10.3389/fcomm.2023.12588518Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
      • (2023)Evaluating the Potential of Interactivity in Explanations for User-Adaptive In-Vehicle Systems – Insights from a Real-World Driving StudyHCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers10.1007/978-3-031-48047-8_19(294-312)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
      • (2022)Artificial Intelligence for Adaptive, Responsive, and Level-Compliant Interaction in the Vehicle of the Future (KARLI)HCI International 2022 Posters10.1007/978-3-031-06394-7_23(164-171)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2022

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media