skip to main content
10.1145/3473682.3481873acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

Designing for Prediction-Level Collaboration Between a Human Driver and an Automated Driving System

Published: 22 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Although automated driving (AD) systems progress fast in recent years, there are still various corner cases that such systems cannot handle well especially for predicting the behavior of surrounding traffic. This may result in discomfort or even dangerous situations. Results from a previous Wizard-of-OZ study suggest that the collaboration between human and system at the prediction level can effectively enhance the experience and comfort of automated driving. For an in-depth investigation of the confluence between AD and driver, a prototype was implemented in a driving simulator driven by a functional AD system that has been partially validated on the public road. Furthermore, we designed and implemented a gaze-button input for intuitive vehicle referencing and a graphical user interface (GUI) for enhancing the explainability of the AD system. Three typical driving scenarios in which an AD could take advantage of the human driver’s anticipation to drive more comfortable and personalized were created for subsequent evaluation.

References

[1]
2020. Smart Eye Pro | Smart Eye Pro DX Specifications. http://smarteye.se/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Smart-Eye-Pro-and-DX-TechSpec.pdf
[2]
Sarah Bonnin, Thomas H. Weisswange, Franz Kummert, and Jens Schmuedderich. 2014. General behavior prediction by a combination of scenario-specific models. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 15, 4(2014), 1478–1488. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2299340
[3]
Frank Dierkes, Marvin Raaijmakers, Max Theo Schmidt, Mohamed Essayed Bouzouraa, Ulrich Hofmann, and Markus Maurer. 2015. Towards a Multi-hypothesis Road Representation for Automated Driving. In IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Proceedings, ITSC, Vol. 2015-Octob. IEEE, 2497–2504. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2015.402
[4]
Frank Ole Flemisch, Klaus Bengler, Heiner Bubb, Hermann Winner, and Ralph Bruder. 2014. Towards cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-Mode and Conduct-by-Wire. Ergonomics 57, 3 (2014), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.869355
[5]
GmbH. 2020. CarMaker: Virtual testing of automobiles and light-duty vehicles,” 2020. https://ipg-automotive.com/products-services/simulation-software/carmaker/
[6]
Stefan Klingelschmitt, Florian Damerow, Volker Willert, and Julian Eggert. 2016. Probabilistic situation assessment framework for multiple, interacting traffic participants in generic traffic scenes. In IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings, Vol. 2016-Augus. IEEE, 1141–1148. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2016.7535533
[7]
Jens Schmuedderich, Rebhan Sven, Thomas Weisswange, Marcus Kleinehagenbrock, Robert Kastner, Mormichi Nishigaki, Hiroyuki Kamiya, Naoki Mori, Shunsuke Kusuhara, and Shimosuke Ishida. 2015. A novel approach to driver behavior prediction using scene context and physical evidence for intelligent Adaptive Cruise Control (i-ACC). 3rd International Symposium on Future Active Safety Technology Towards zero traffic accidents (FAST-zero 2015)(2015). https://trid.trb.org/view/1412207
[8]
M Schreiber, M Kauer, S Hakuli, and R Bruder. 2010. Conduct-by-Wire: Evaluation von teilautonomer Fahrzeugführung mit Hilfe der Wizard of Oz-Technik. Neue Arbeits-und Lebenswelten gestalten 56 (2010), 161–164.
[9]
Ken Upton. 1995. A modern approach. Vol. 74. Prentice Hall. 111–113 pages. https://doi.org/10.1049/me:19950308
[10]
Chao Wang, Matti Krüger, and Christiane B. Wiebel-Herboth. 2020. ”Watch out!”: Prediction-Level Intervention for Automated. In Proceedings - 12th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2020. 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410652
[11]
Chao Wang, Thomas H Weisswange, Matti Krueger, and Christiane B Wiebel-Herboth. 2021. Human-Vehicle Cooperation on Prediction-Level: Enhancing Automated Driving with Human Foresight. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.03019(2021).
[12]
Thomas H. Weisswange, Sven Rebhan, Bram Bolder, Nico A. Steinhardt, Frank Joublin, Jens Schmuedderich, and Christian Goerick. 2019. Intelligent Traffic Flow Assist: Optimized Highway Driving Using Conditional Behavior Prediction. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2019.2898969

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)How to Design Human-Vehicle Cooperation for Automated Driving: A Review of Use Cases, Concepts, and InterfacesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti80300168:3(16)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2024
  • (2022)Design Factors of Shared Situation Awareness Interface in Human–Machine Co-DrivingInformation10.3390/info1309043713:9(437)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Researches advanced in human-computer collaboration and human-machine cooperation: from variances to common prospect2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and High-Performance Computing (AIAHPC 2022)10.1117/12.2641865(142)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2022
  1. Designing for Prediction-Level Collaboration Between a Human Driver and an Automated Driving System

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AutomotiveUI '21 Adjunct: 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
    September 2021
    234 pages
    ISBN:9781450386418
    DOI:10.1145/3473682
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 September 2021

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Cooperative driving
    2. automated driving
    3. gaze interaction
    4. human-machine interaction

    Qualifiers

    • Demonstration
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    AutomotiveUI '21
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

    Upcoming Conference

    AutomotiveUI '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)How to Design Human-Vehicle Cooperation for Automated Driving: A Review of Use Cases, Concepts, and InterfacesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti80300168:3(16)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2024
    • (2022)Design Factors of Shared Situation Awareness Interface in Human–Machine Co-DrivingInformation10.3390/info1309043713:9(437)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2022
    • (2022)Researches advanced in human-computer collaboration and human-machine cooperation: from variances to common prospect2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and High-Performance Computing (AIAHPC 2022)10.1117/12.2641865(142)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media