skip to main content
10.1145/3473714.3473815acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Negative binomial model in the impact of Corporate Technology M&A on Innovation Performance

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 August 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Fierce competition urges enterprises to continuously increase their pursuit of new technologies, technological M&A have become more and more important approaches for companies to be open innovation because they are conducive to enterprises to obtain strategic resources and core capabilities for R&D and innovation.

This paper selects listed companies in the biopharmaceutical industry with high technological demand and active M&A as the research objects from 2013 to 2016. Firstly, using a paired Student's t test verify that the technical acquisition can actively promote the business innovation performance. Secondly, using the fixed-effect negative binomial model on technology M&A to analyze the influence of M&A mode, R&D capabilities and M&A experience factors on the relationship between technology M&A and innovation performance. Results show that the M&A experience and related industry technology M&A play a positive role in regulating the relationship between technology M&A and innovation performance.

References

  1. Spyros Arvanites, Tobias Stucki, "How Swiss small and medium-sized firms assess the performance impact of mergers and acquisitions, " Small Business Economics, vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 339--360, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Gautam Ahuja, Riitta Katila, "Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study, " Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 197--220, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Myriam Cloodt, John Hagedoorn, Hans Van Kranenburg, "Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in hightech industries, " Research Policy, vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 642--654, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jan Bena, Kai Li, "Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions, " The Journal of Finance, vol. 69, No. 5, pp. 1923--1960, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kim C S, Inkpen A C, "Cross-border R&D alliances, absorptive capacity and technology leaning, " Journal of International, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 313--329, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang Yan, "Mixed-ownership mergers and acquisitions and innovationdriven development---a longitudinal case study of the "Hanlan Environment" of local state-owned enterprises in Guangdong Province from 2001 to 2015, " Beijing: Management World, No. 6, pp. 150--163, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Xu Chaoyang, Huang Jing, "Analysis of the mechanism and effect of technology supplementation in corporate mergers and acquisitions, " Research in Science of Science, vol. 26, No. S2, pp. 391--397, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang Jintao, Pei Ling, "Research on the impact of technology mergers and acquisitions on the performance of high-tech companies, " Science and Technology Management Research, No. 4, pp. 136--143, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. He Dengjiao, "An Empirical Study on the Contribution of Technology M&A to Corporate M&A Performance, " Inner Mongolia Science Technology and Economy, No. 6, pp. 27--28, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Xing Zejia, "The impact of technology mergers and acquisitions on corporate innovation performance, " Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen Yifan, "Research on corporate innovation performance based on technology mergers and acquisitions, " Nanjing University, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hao Qingmin, Ren Huanhuan, "Research on the innovation evolution performance of technology mergers and R&D, " Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, vol. 32, No. 16, pp. 63--68, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang Zheng, Nie Si, "Research on M&A Innovation Performance of Listed Manufacturing Companies in China, " Scientific Research Management, vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 36--43, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gong Yuhui, "Research on Performance Evaluation of Technology M&A of Listed Companies in my country, " Shanghai International Studies University, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Negative binomial model in the impact of Corporate Technology M&A on Innovation Performance

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICCIR '21: Proceedings of the 2021 1st International Conference on Control and Intelligent Robotics
          June 2021
          807 pages
          ISBN:9781450390231
          DOI:10.1145/3473714

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 August 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          ICCIR '21 Paper Acceptance Rate131of239submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate131of239submissions,55%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader