skip to main content
10.1145/3473714.3473830acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Would Humans Want to Work Side-by-Side with Autonomous Robots: The Effect of Robot Autonomy on Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and Desire for Contact

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 August 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The emergence of automatic machines is a hot topic in society. In this study, we examine the effects of robot autonomy on perceived usefulness, ease of use, and desire for contact. Participants watched a video of robots performing a variety of tasks -the robots were either autonomous and able to ignore human commands, or non-autonomous and could only obey human commands. The results showed that participants who watched videos of autonomous robots generally rated the robots as more useful than non-autonomous robots, but the difference was not statistically significant. On the other hand, people who watched videos of autonomous robots had lower perceived ease of use and less desire for contact than non-autonomous robots. These findings have practical implications for artificial intelligence research and raise new questions about the relationship between robot autonomy and human perception.

References

  1. Calverley, D. J., 2006. Android science and animal rights, does an analogy exist? Connect. Sci. 18, 403--417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Arkin, R. C., Moshkina, L., 2007. Lethality and autonomous robots: An ethical stance. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Technology and Society: Risk, Uncertainty, Vulnerability, Technology and Society, ISTAS, June 1, 2007 - June 2, 2007 International Symposium on Technology and Society, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sparrow, R., 2007. Killer robots. J. Appl. Philos. 24, 62--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kahn, P., Ishiguro, H., Friedman, B., Kanda, T., 2006. What is a Human? -Toward Psychological Benchmarks in the Field of Human-Robot Interaction. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006, pp. 364--371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Sullins, J. P., 2011. When is a robot a moral agent? In: Anderson, M., Anderson, S. L. (Eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 151--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Stafford, R. Q., MacDonald, B. A., Jayawardena, C., Wegner, D. M., Broadbent, E., 2013. Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6, 17--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Weiss, A., Wurhofer, D., Lankes, M., Tscheligi, M., 2008. Autonomous vs. tele-operated: How people perceive human-robot collaboration with HRP-2. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human -Robot Interaction, HRI'09 Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 257--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Waytz, A., Heafner, J., Epley, N., 2014. The mind in the machine anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 52, 113--117Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kim, T., Hinds, P., 2006. Who Should I Blame? Effects of Autonomy and Transparency on Attributions in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006 pp. 80--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart 27(3):425--478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Walters ML (2008) The design space for robot appearance and behaviour for social robot companions. Dissertation, University of Hertfordshire.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gombolay MC, Gutierrez RA, Clarke SG et al (2015) Decision-making authority, team efficiency and human worker satisfaction in mixed human-- robot teams. Autonomous Robots 39:293--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Glover, J., Thrun, S., Matthews, J. T., 2004. Learning user models of mobility-related activities through instrumented walking aids. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation. pp. 3306--3312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Scanaill, C. N., Carew, S., Barralon, P., Noury, N., Lyons, D., Lyons, G. M., 2006. A review of approaches to mobility telemonitoring of the elderly in their living environment. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34, 547--56Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Would Humans Want to Work Side-by-Side with Autonomous Robots: The Effect of Robot Autonomy on Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and Desire for Contact

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCIR '21: Proceedings of the 2021 1st International Conference on Control and Intelligent Robotics
      June 2021
      807 pages
      ISBN:9781450390231
      DOI:10.1145/3473714

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 August 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ICCIR '21 Paper Acceptance Rate131of239submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate131of239submissions,55%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader