Analysis of Significant Factors Influencing the Technology Acceptance of Smartglasses in the Craft Sector: Analyse signifikanter Einflussfaktoren auf die Technologieakzeptanz von Smartglasses im Handwerk
Pages 92 - 109
Abstract
Smartglasses mit Augmented Reality Technologie erfreuen sich immer größerer Beliebtheit in der Arbeitswelt und finden zunehmend Verwendung als Arbeitsassistenzsysteme. In Deutschland sind die Geräte im Handwerk, insbesondere in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen (KMU), noch nicht weit verbreitet, obwohl sie zentralen Herausforderungen wie Fachkräftemangel und kürzer werdenden Innovations- und Produktionszyklen entgegenwirken können. Um die Wahrnehmung von Smartglasses im Handwerk zu beleuchten, wird eine erste quantitative Analyse durchgeführt. Hierzu wird ein kontextspezifisches Forschungsmodell für die Sanitär-, Heizungs- und Klimatechnik-(SHK-)Branche entwickelt, das die Akzeptanzfaktoren Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Compatibility, Perceived Risks und Perceived Substitutability umfasst. Auf Basis einer Online-Umfrage (N = 38) wird das entwickelte Modell evaluiert und eine deskriptive Analyse sowie Korrelationsanalyse zur Auswertung der Umfragedaten vorgenommen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Nutzung von Smartglasses überwiegend Zustimmung durch die Beschäftigten erfährt und die Technik als nützlich, einfach bedienbar, risikofrei und mit der eigenen Arbeitsweise vereinbar wahrgenommen wird.
References
[1]
Wenke Apt, Marc Bovenschulte, Kai Priesack, Christine Weiss, and Ernst A. Hartmann. 2018. Einsatz von digitalen Assistenzsystemen im Betrieb: Forschungsbericht 502 im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Arbeit und Soziales. iit – Institut für Innovation und Technik, Berlin. Retrieved December 8, 2020 from https://www.iit-berlin.de/iit-docs/0b0ab71d0ed949269fa39e2b38665fde_Einsatz-von-digitalen-Assistenzsystemen-im-Betrieb.pdf
[2]
Nuri Basoglu, Ali E. Ok, and Tugrul U. Daim. 2017. What will it take to adopt smart glasses: A consumer choice based review?Technology in Society 50(2017), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.04.005
[3]
Lisa Berkemeier, Christina Niemöller, Dirk Metzger, and Oliver Thomas. 2018. Akzeptanz von Smart Glasses für die Aus- und Weiterbildung. In Digitalisierung in der Aus- und Weiterbildung: Virtual und Augmented Reality für Industrie 4.0, Oliver Thomas, Dirk Metzger, and Helmut Niegemann (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56551-3_10
[4]
Lisa Berkemeier, Sebastian Werning, Benedikt Zobel, Ingmar Ickerott, and Oliver Thomas. 2017. Der Kunde als Dienstleister: Akzeptanz und Gebrauchstauglichkeit von Smart Glasses im Self-Service. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 54, 5 (2017), 781–794. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-017-0342-1
[5]
Boeing. 2018. Boeing: Boeing Tests Augmented Reality in the Factory. Boeing. Retrieved January 5, 2021 from https://www.boeing.com/features/2018/01/augmented-reality-01-18.page
[6]
Cherrylyn Buenaflor and Hee-Cheol Kim. 2013. Six human factors to acceptability of wearable computers. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering 8, 3(2013), 103–114. Retrieved December 21, 2020 from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.307.215&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[7]
Andrew Burton-Jones and Geoffrey S. Hubona. 2006. The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 43, 6 (2006), 706–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.03.007
[8]
Business Wire. 2019. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Headsets Poised for Significant Growth, According to IDC | Business Wire. Business Wire. Retrieved January 06, 2021 from https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190328005623/en/Augmented-Reality-and-Virtual-Reality-Headsets-Poised-for-Significant-Growth-According-to-IDC
[9]
Lanny Cohen, Patrice Duboé, Jerome Buvat, Dorine Meltont, Amol Khadikar, and Hiral Shah. 2018. Augmented and Virtual Reality in Operations: a guide for investment. Technical Report. Capgemini Research Institute. Retrieved December 10, 2020 from https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/AR-VR-in-Operations1.pdf
[10]
Fred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw. 1989. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 35, 8 (1989), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
[11]
Scott Erickson. 2016. Microsoft HoloLens enables thyssenkrupp to transform the global elevator industry. Microsoft Corporation. Retrieved November 18, 2020 from https://blogs.windows.com/devices/2016/09/15/microsoft-hololens-enables-thyssenkrupp-to-transform-the-global-elevator-industry/
[12]
C. H. Ernst, Bastian Stock, and Tiago Ferreira. 2016. The Usage of Augmented Reality Smartglasses: The Role of Perceived Substitutability. In AMCIS 2016 Proceedings (San Diego, California). Association for Information Systems AIS, San Diego, California, 1–7. Retrieved December 10, 2020 from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Usage-of-Augmented-Reality-Smartglasses%3A-The-of-Ernst-Stock/a541d58b3129a6449fe4b0e171e9ba5b2f66d22d
[13]
Jendrik Haase and Daniel Beimborn. 2017. Acceptance of Warehouse Picking Systems: A Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research (Bangalore, India) (SIGMIS-CPR ’17), Rajiv Kishore Rajendra K. Bandi (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/3084381.3084409
[14]
Joe F. Hair, Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19, 2 (2011), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
[15]
Handwerkskammer für Schwaben. 2019. AR-Brille für die Heizungsreparatur | Handwerk-Digital. Handwerkskammer für Schwaben. Retrieved November 18, 2020 from https://handwerk-digital.org/blog/ar-brille
[16]
hurra wir bauen. 2019. ISH 2019: Projekt ARSuL. Video. Retrieved November 23, 2020 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMND3BjIvik
[17]
IArC – International Agency for research on Cancer. 2013. Non-ionizing radiation, part II: radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. IArC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, Vol. 102. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. Retrieved December 16, 2020 from https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono102.pdf
[18]
Mahdokht Kalantari and Philipp Rauschnabel. 2018. Exploring the Early Adopters of Augmented Reality Smart Glasses: The Case of Microsoft HoloLens. In Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality: Empowering Human, Place and Business, Timothy Jung and M. Claudia tom Dieck (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64027-3_16
[19]
Britta Kirchhoff, Sascha Wischniewski, Lars Adolph, Stephan Imhof, and Andrea Thalmann. 2016. Head Mounted Displays - Arbeitshilfen der Zukunft. Bedingungen für den sicheren und ergonomischen Einsatz monokularer Systeme. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund. https://doi.org/10.21934/baua:praxis20160809
[20]
Uta Knebel. 2011. IT-gestützte Gesundheitsförderungsprogramme: Design, Einführung und Evaluation am Beispiel Gesundheitssport. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6702-2
[21]
Jay Kothari. 2017. A new chapter for Glass. After two years in a limited program... | by Jay Kothari | X, the moonshot factory. Medium. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://blog.x.company/a-new-chapter-for-glass-c7875d40bf24
[22]
Microsoft Corporation. n.d. HoloLens 2 – Overview, Features, and Specs | Microsoft HoloLens. Microsoft Corporation. Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/hardware#
[23]
Gary C. Moore and Izak Benbasat. 1991. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research 2, 3 (1991), 192–222. Retrieved December 18, 2020 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23010883
[24]
Christina Niemöller, Dirk Metzger, and Oliver Thomas. 2017. Design and Evaluation of a Smart-Glasses-based Service Support System. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (St. Gallen) (WI2017), Jan M. Leimeister and Walter Brenner (Eds.). Association for Information Systems AIS, St. Gallen, 106–120. Retrieved December 7, 2020 from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christina_Niemoeller/publication/315689420_Design_and_Evaluation_of_a_Smart-Glasses-based_Service_Support_System/links/59dd5016aca272b698e1630c/Design-and-Evaluation-of-a-Smart-Glasses-based-Service-Support-System.pdf
[25]
Ali E. Ok, Nuri A. Basoglu, and Tugrul Daim. 2015. Exploring the design factors of smart glasses. In 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) (Portland, OR, USA), Dundar F. Kocaoglu (Ed.). IEEE, Portland, OR, USA, 1657–1664. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2015.7273236
[26]
Philipp A. Rauschnabel, Jun He, and Young Ro. 2016. An exploration of intended use of augmented reality smart glasses. In Proceedings from the 2016 Midwest DSI Annual Conference (Valparaiso University Indiana) (Nursing and Health Professions Faculty Presentations), Jeffrey A. Coto and Coleen Wilder (Eds.). Nursing and Health Professions Faculty, ValpoScholar, Valparaiso, Indiana, 98–122. Retrieved December 7, 2020 from https://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=nursing_fac_presentations
[27]
Philipp A. Rauschnabel and Young K. Ro. 2016. Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing 11, 2 (2016), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtmkt.2016.075690
[28]
Alexander Salinas Segura and Frédéric Thiesse. 2015. Extending UTAUT2 to Explore Pervasive Information Systems. In Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems(ECIS 2015) (Münster) (Completed Research Papers, 154), Marco de Marco Jörg Becker, Jan vom Brocke (Ed.). Association for Information Systems AIS, Münster, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18151/7217456
[29]
Patrick Schober, Christa Boer, and Lothar A. Schwarte. 2018. Correlation Coefficients. Anesthesia & Analgesia 126, 5 (May 2018), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002864
[30]
Bastian Stock, Tiago P. dos Santos Ferreira, and Claus-Peter H. Ernst. 2016. Does Perceived Health Risk Influence Smartglasses Usage?In The Drivers of Wearable Device Usage: Practice and Perspectives, Claus-Peter H. Ernst (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30376-5_2
[31]
Adario Strange. 2014. Another Google Glass Wearer Attacked in San Francisco. Mashable. https://mashable.com/2014/04/13/google-glass-wearer-attacked/?europe=true
[32]
Syakirah M. Taib, Rebecca De Coster, and Janerose Nyamu. 2016. Innovation diffusion of wearable mobile computing: Pervasive computing perspective. In 2016 International Conference on Information Society (i-Society) (Dublin, Ireland). IEEE, Dublin, Ireland, 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1109/i-Society.2016.7854185
[33]
Jan Terhoeven, Britta Grauel, Matthias Wille, and Sascha Wischniewski. 2015. Head Mounted Displays als Arbeitshilfen der Zukunft – Gestaltung eines beanspruchungsoptimalen Einsatzes. In 12. Fachtagung Digitales Engineering zum Planen, Testen und Betreiben technischer Systeme(IFF-Wissenschaftstage 2015 Tagungsband, Vol. 18), Michael Schenk (Ed.). Fraunhofer-Institut für Fabrikbetrieb und -automatisierung IFF, Magdeburg, 125–129. Retrieved December 8, 2020 from https://www.iff.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/iff/de/dokumente/publikationen/iff-wissenschaftstage-2015-digital-engineering-tagungsband-fraunhofer-iff.pdf
[34]
Jan Terhoeven, Frank-Peter Schiefelbein, and Sascha Wischniewski. 2018. User expectations on smart glasses as work assistance in electronics manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 51st CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems 72 (2018), 1028–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.060
[35]
Meinald T. Thielsch and Simone Weltzin. 2013. Online-Mitarbeiterbefragungen. In Handbuch Mitarbeiterbefragung, Michel E. Domsch and Désirée Ladwig (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35295-9_3
[36]
Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27, 3 (2003), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
[37]
Daniel Weiz, Gagat Anand, and Claus-Peter H. Ernst. 2016. The Influence of Subjective Norm on the Usage of Smartglasses. In The Drivers of Wearable Device Usage: Practice and Perspectives, Claus-Peter H. Ernst (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30376-5_1
[38]
Thomas Wilde, Thomas Hess, and Konrad Hilbers. 2008. Akzeptanzforschung bei nicht marktreifen Technologien: typische methodische Probleme und deren Auswirkungen. In Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (München) (MKWI 2018), Martin Bichler, Thomas Hess, Helmut Krcmar, Ulrike Lechner, Florian Matthes, Arnold Picot, Benjamin Speitkamp, and Petra Wolf(Eds.). GITO-Verlag, Berlin, 1031–1043. Retrieved December 9, 2020 from http://ibis.in.tum.de/mkwi08/16_IT_und_die_Medien-_Telco-_und_Software-Industrie/01_Wilde.pdf
[39]
Matthias Wille, Lars Adolph, Britta Grauel, Sascha Wischniewski, Sabine Theis, and Thomas Alexander. 2014. Prolonged Work with Head Mounted Displays. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers Adjunct Program - ISWC '14 Adjunct (Seattle, Washington) (ISWC ’14 Adjunct), Lucy Dunne (Ed.). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1145/2641248.2645638
[40]
Zentralverband des Deutschen Handwerks e.V.n.d. Betriebe/Beschäftigte/Umsätze. Zentralverband des Deutschen Handwerks e. V. (ZDH). Retrieved December 10, 2020 from https://www.zdh.de/daten-fakten/betriebebeschaeftigteumsaetze/
[41]
Zentralverband Sanitär Heizung Klima (ZVSHK). n.d. Handwerksgeselle 4.0: Kognitive Assistenz. Zentralverband Sanitär Heizung Klima (ZVSHK). Retrieved December 15, 2020 from https://www.hwg40.de/hintergrundinfos/kognitive-assistenz
Recommendations
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
![cover image ACM Other conferences](/cms/asset/6c485f54-219c-4154-9e56-efd326b69753/3473856.cover.jpg)
September 2021
613 pages
ISBN:9781450386456
DOI:10.1145/3473856
Copyright © 2021 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 13 September 2021
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
MuC '21
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 130Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)8
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 14 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format