skip to main content
10.1145/3474085.3475524acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ArtScience and the ICECUBE LED Display [ILDm^3]

Published:17 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

ICECUBE LED Display [ILDm^3] is a cubic-meter, 1/1000th scale model of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, a novel telescope that looks for nearly invisible cosmic messengers, neutrinos, using a cubic-kilometer of instrumented ice starting 1450 meters below the surface at the South Pole. The display uses art methodologies as a means for expressing imperceptible astrophysical events as sound, light and colour in the domain of the human sensorium. The experience is as aesthetically critical as it is facilitatory to an intuitive understanding of subatomic astrophysical data, leading to new ways of knowing about our Universe and its processes.

The objective of this project was to build a static volumetric dis- play as a model of IceCube for visualization of spatio-temporal data recorded by the observatory. While the primary use of the display is as a model for artistic, educational, and outreach purposes, the display is also being explored as an instrument for the scientific analysis of IceCube data sets by human observers. The technical approach to designing the display was to place an emphasis on reproducibility so that it can be readily built and used by the re- searchers in the IceCube research community. Evaluation of the display is being used as a baseline for the development of future exhibits.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

ACM MM presentation_1.mp4

mp4

184.5 MB

References

  1. Xavier Amatriain, JoAnn Kuchera-Morin, Tobias Hollerer, and Stephen Travis Pope. 2009. The AlloSphere: Immersive Multimedia for Scientific Discovery and Artistic Exploration. IEEE MultiMedia, Vol. 16, 2 (April 2009), 64--75. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2009.35 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Erol Aygar, Colin Ware, and David Rogers. 2018. The Contribution of Stereoscopic and Motion Depth Cues to the Perception of Structures in 3D Point Clouds. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., Vol. 15, 2 (Feb. 2018), 9:1--9:13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3147914 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. K. W. Brodlie. 2012. Visualization Techniques. In Scientific Visualization: Techniques and Applications, K. W. Brodlie, L. A. Carpenter, R. A. Earnshaw, J. R. Gallop, R. J. Hubbold, A. M. Mumford, C. D. Osland, and P. Quarendon (Eds.). Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany, 37--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. O. Bruning, H. Burkhardt, and S. Myers. 2012. The large hadron collider. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, Vol. 67, 3 (July 2012), 705--734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.03.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jason Bryer and Kimberly Speerschneider. 2016. likert: Analysis and Visualization Likert Items. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=likertGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Steve Bryson. 1996. Virtual reality in scientific visualization. Commun. ACM, Vol. 39, 5 (1996), 62--71. Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rune Haubo Bojesen Christensen. 2019. ordinal: Regression Models for Ordinal Data. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ordinalGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shenzhen Shiji Lighting Co. 2021. 3535 RGB LED Strip, 5mm LED Strip. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Wholesale-custom-dc5v-Smd-3535-RGB/_60669857166.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Carolina Cruz-Neira, Daniel J. Sandin, and Thomas A. DeFanti. 1993. Surround-screen Projection-based Virtual Reality: The Design and Implementation of the CAVE. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '93). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 135--142. https://doi.org/10.1145/166117.166134 event-place: Anaheim, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Agnes Denes. 2008. The Human Argument: the Writings of Agnes Denes. Spring Publications, Putnam, Conn.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, and Albert-Georg Lang. 2009. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 41, 4 (Nov. 2009), 1149--1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Processing Foundation. 2021 a. Processing.org. https://processing.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. The R Foundation. 2021 b. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Adrian Freed and Andrew Schmeder. 2021. Open Sound Control. http://opensoundcontrol.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tovi Grossman and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2006. An Evaluation of Depth Perception on Volumetric Displays. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Venezia, Italy) (AVI '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 193--200. https://doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133305 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Adafruit Industries. 2021. NeoPixels Products Category on Adafruit Industries. https://www.adafruit.com/category/168Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gyorgy Kepes. 1965. Structure in art and in science. G. Braziller, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Russell V. Lenth, Paul Buerkner, Maxime Herve, Jonathon Love, Hannes Riebl, and Henrik Singmann. 2021. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeansGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Leonardo/ISAST. 2020. Leonardo: Our History. https://www.leonardo.info/historyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Marc Levoy and Pat Hanrahan. 1996. Light field rendering. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, New Orleans, Louisiana USA, 31--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Tao Ni, G. S. Schmidt, O. G. Staadt, M. A. Livingston, R. Ball, and R. May. 2006. A Survey of Large High-Resolution Display Technologies, Techniques, and Applications. In IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR 2006). IEEE, Alexandria, VA, USA, 223--236. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2006.20 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. OpenFrameworks.cc. 2021. openFrameworks. https://openframeworks.cc/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jack Ox. 2014. Art-science is a conceptual blend. Leonardo, Vol. 47, 5 (2014), 424--424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Tom Peterka, Robert Ross, Hongfeng Yu, Kwan-Liu Ma, Robert Kooima, and Javier Girado. 2009. Autostereoscopic display of large-scale scientific visualization. In Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XX, Vol. 7237. International Society for Optics and Photonics, San Jose, California, USA, 723706. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.805422Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. PJRC.COM. 2021 a. Teensy 3.2-4.0 OctoWS2811 Adaptor. https://www.pjrc.com/store/octo28_adaptor.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. PJRC.COM. 2021 b. Teensy 3.2 USB Development Board. https://www.pjrc.com/store/teensy32.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Brian J. Rogers and Thomas S. Collett. 1989. The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular disparity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, Vol. 41, 4 (Nov. 1989), 697--717. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748908402390Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Bob Root-Bernstein, Todd Siler, Adam Brown, and Kenneth Snelson. 2011. ArtScience: integrative collaboration to create a sustainable future. Leonardo, Vol. 44, 3 (2011), 192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Philippe Sormani, Guelfo Carbone, and Priska Gisler. 2018. Practicing art/science: Experiments in an emerging field. Routledge, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Troy D. Straszheim and the IceCube Collaboration. 2020. Steamshovel software. https://software.icecube.wisc.edu/combo/trunk/projects/steamshovel/basics.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. SuperCollider. 2021. SuperCollider. https://supercollider.github.io/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. A. van Dam, A. S. Forsberg, D. H. Laidlaw, J. J. LaViola, and R. M. Simpson. 2000. Immersive VR for scientific visualization: a progress report. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol. 20, 6 (Nov 2000), 26--52. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.888006 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Colin Ware. 2013. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Colin Ware and Peter Mitchell. 2008. Visualizing graphs in three dimensions. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, Vol. 5, 1 (Jan. 2008), 2:1--2:15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1279640.1279642 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Dawn Williams. 2020. Status and prospects for the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 952 (Feb. 2020), 161650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.11.109Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. WIPAC. 2021. WIPAC - Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center. https://wipac.wisc.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. ArtScience and the ICECUBE LED Display [ILDm^3]

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            MM '21: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
            October 2021
            5796 pages
            ISBN:9781450386517
            DOI:10.1145/3474085

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 17 October 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

            Upcoming Conference

            MM '24
            MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
            October 28 - November 1, 2024
            Melbourne , VIC , Australia
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader