skip to main content
10.1145/3474124.3474130acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic3Conference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Malignancy Grade Identification and Classification of Brain MR Images with New 2D Co-occurrence Matrix and Wavelet Transformation

Published:04 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Malignancy is one of such terms in medical science that always requires quick attention. The proper identification and classification of such malignant cells were always considered as the challenging task. Moreover, with the use of computer assisted automation systems, identification of grading becomes easier but it requires a strong running algorithm for maintaining trust on results. This paper proposed a new algorithm in machine learning environment that fetches hidden patterns from the input MR images and found some relevant information about malignant cells. The proposed algorithm is the 2D co-occurrence matrix that uses pixel information for creating sample space. In addition of this 2D wavelet transformation was used to reduce the input image dimensions and fetching spectral information. The collective use of the DWT with proposed algorithm fetches better feature information about malignancy in brain MR images. The experimental result shows that the proposed approach gives better classification accuracy and performs well as compared with existing methods.

References

  1. Mehmet Aci, Cigdem Inan, and Mutlu Avci. 2010. A hybrid classification method of k nearest neighbor, Bayesian methods and genetic algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications 37, 7 (2010), 5061–5067.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mubashir Ahmad, Mahmoodul Hassan, Imran Shafi, and Abdelrahman Osman. 2012. Classification of tumors in human brain MRI using wavelet and support vector machine. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering 8, 2 (2012), 25–31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Tao Dacheng, Li Xuelong, Yuan Yuan, Yu Nenghai, Liu Zhengkai, and Tang Xiao-ou. 2002. A set of novel textural features based on 3D co-occurrence matrix for content-based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002.(IEEE Cat. No. 02EX5997), Vol. 2. IEEE, 1403–1407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. N Dhivya, R Anusuya Lakshmi, and D Ramalakshmi. 2013. A Hybrid Approach for Detection And Classification of Fabric Faults In Textile Industries Using Wavelet Transform And GLCM Technique. jip 2(2013), 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K Hammouche and JG Postaire. 2008. Multidimensional texture analysis for unsupervised pattern classification. Pattern Recognition Techniques, Technology and Applications (2008), 626.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Robert M Haralick. 1979. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc. IEEE 67, 5 (1979), 786–804.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Robert M Haralick, Karthikeyan Shanmugam, and Its’ Hak Dinstein. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics6 (1973), 610–621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Vatika Jalali and Dapinder Kaur. 2020. A study of classification and feature extraction techniques for brain tumor detection. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval (2020), 1–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Vassili Kovalev and Maria Petrou. 1996. Multidimensional co-occurrence matrices for object recognition and matching. Graphical Models and Image Processing 58, 3 (1996), 187–197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A Reema Matthew, Achala Prasad, and P Babu Anto. 2017. A review on feature extraction techniques for tumor detection and classification from brain MRI. In 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Instrumentation and Control Technologies (ICICICT). IEEE, 1766–1771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Timo Ojala, Matti Pietikainen, and Topi Maenpaa. 2002. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 24, 7(2002), 971–987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A Padma and R Sukanesh. 2011. Automatic classification and segmentation of brain tumor in CT images using optimal dominant gray level run length texture features. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 2, 10(2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jainy Sachdeva, Vinod Kumar, Indra Gupta, Niranjan Khandelwal, and Chirag Kamal Ahuja. 2013. Segmentation, feature extraction, and multiclass brain tumor classification. Journal of digital imaging 26, 6 (2013), 1141–1150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jainy Sachdeva, Vinod Kumar, Indra Gupta, Niranjan Khandelwal, and Chirag Kamal Ahuja. 2016. A package-SFERCB-“Segmentation, feature extraction, reduction and classification analysis by both SVM and ANN for brain tumors”. Applied soft computing 47 (2016), 151–167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mansi Saraswat, Anil Kumar Goswami, and Aastha Tiwari. 2013. Object recognition using texture based analysis. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies 4, 6(2013), 775–782.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alok Sarkar, Md Maniruzzaman, Md Shamim Ahsan, Mohiuddin Ahmad, Mohammad Ismat Kadir, and SM Taohidul Islam. 2020. Identification and Classification of Brain Tumor from MRI with Feature Extraction by Support Vector Machine. In 2020 International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET). IEEE, 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. N Varuna Shree and TNR Kumar. 2018. Identification and classification of brain tumor MRI images with feature extraction using DWT and probabilistic neural network. Brain informatics 5, 1 (2018), 23–30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ankit Vidyarthi and Namita Mittal. 2014. Utilization of shape and texture features with statistical feature selection mechanism for classification of malignant tumors in MR images. BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK 59 (2014), S615–S619.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ankit Vidyarthi and Namita Mittal. 2015. Performance analysis of Gabor-Wavelet based features in classification of high grade malignant brain tumors. In 2015 39th National Systems Conference (NSC). IEEE, 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IC3-2021: Proceedings of the 2021 Thirteenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing
    August 2021
    483 pages
    ISBN:9781450389204
    DOI:10.1145/3474124

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 November 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format