skip to main content
10.1145/3474963.3475843acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Frame Rate Up-Conversion Algorithm Based on Infrared Image

Published:14 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the more and more common use of infrared video in life, people have higher and higher requirements for infrared imaging frame rates. Better quality infrared images provide a better basis for subsequent target recognition, video compression and decompression operations. Therefore, it is of great significance to effectively obtain infrared high frame rate images and improve the quality of infrared images. As an effective means of video conversion, frame rate enhancement technology has become a research hotspot in the direction of computer vision. However, the existing video interpolation methods based on infrared images are all implemented based on block matching, which cannot well approximate the complex moving real world. In order to solve these problems, an optical flow method based on pixel motion compensation is proposed for infrared video interpolation. The second interpolation method can make better use of the motion information in the video. In the end, an optical flow optimization network is used for optimization, which can better optimize the artifacts in the optical flow estimation and improve the final image quality. Experiments show that our method has a better effect than existing methods on models on various infrared video data sets, and has lower computational complexity.

References

  1. Salton G, McGill M J. Introduction to modern information retrieval[J]. 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sullivan G J, Ohm J, Han W-J, Overview of the high efficiency video coding (HEVC) standard[J]. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, 2012, 22(12) : 1649 –1668.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bauer D , Bonacker M , Cavonius C R . Frame repetition rate for flicker-free viewing of bright VDU screens[J]. Displays, Technology and Applications, 1983, 4(1):31-33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Richard C, David D, Yadong L I. MOTION ADAPTIVE FRAME AVERAGING FOR ULTRASOUND DOPPLER COLOR FLOW IMAGING:, US 7153268 B2[P]. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yan N, Liu D, Li H, A convolutional neural network approach for halfpel interpolation in video coding[C] // Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2017 IEEE International Symposium on. 2017 : 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Z, He T, Jin X, Learning for Video Compression[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.09869, 2018]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dosovitskiy A, Fischery P, Ilg E, FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networks[C]// IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ilg E, Mayer N, Saikia T, FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networks[C]// IEEE Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhou T, Tulsiani S, Sun W, View synthesis by appearance flow[C] // European conference on computer vision. 2016 : 286–301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu Z, Yeh R, Tang X, Video frame synthesis using deep voxel flow[C]// International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) : Vol 2. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Niklaus S, Mai L, Liu F. Video frame interpolation via adaptive separable convolution[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.01692, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Niklaus S, Liu F. Context-aware Synthesis for Video Frame Interpolation[J]. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jiang H, Sun D, Jampani V, Super SloMo: High Quality Estimation of Multiple Intermediate Frames for Video Interpolation[J]. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ioffe S, Szegedy C. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03167, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Santurkar S, Tsipras D, Ilyas A, How Does Batch Normalization Help Optimization?(No, It Is Not About Internal Covariate Shift)[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.11604, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Horn B K P, Schunck B G. Determining optical flow[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1980, 17(1–3):185-203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lucas B D, Kanade T. Optical navigation by the method of differences[C]// International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Fleet DJ, Jepson A D. Computation of component image velocity from local phase information[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1990, 5(1):77-104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mahajan D, Huang F C, Matusik W, Moving gradients: a path-based method for plausible image interpolation[C]// Acm Siggraph. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. N. Wadhwa, M. Rubinstein, F. Durand, and W. T. Freeman. Phase-based video motion processing. ACM Trans. Graph., 32(4):80:1–80:10, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. P. Didyk, P. Sitthi-amorn, W. T. Freeman, F. Durand, and W. Matusik. Joint view expansion and filtering for automultiscopic 3D displays. ACM Trans. Graph., 32(6):221:1–221:8, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Meister S, Hur J, Roth S. UnFlow: Unsupervised Learning of Optical Flow with a Bidirectional Census Loss[J]. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu P , Lyu M , King I , SelFlow: Self-Supervised Learning of Optical Flow[J]. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Hur J , Roth S . Iterative Residual Refinement for Joint Optical Flow and Occlusion Estimation[J]. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Long G , Kneip L , Alvarez J M , Learning Image Matching by Simply Watching Video[C]// European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Cham, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Frame Rate Up-Conversion Algorithm Based on Infrared Image

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICCMS '21: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation
        June 2021
        276 pages
        ISBN:9781450389792
        DOI:10.1145/3474963

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 October 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format