skip to main content
10.1145/3474995.3475002acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effect of Change to Asynchronous Mode of Learning Calculus in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Published:22 November 2021Publication History
First page image

References

  1. World Health Organization. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Shah, A. U. M., Safri, S. N. A., Thevadas, R., Noordin, N. K., Abd Rahman, A., Sekawi, Z., ... & Sultan, M. T. H. (2020). COVID-19 outbreak in Malaysia: Actions taken by the Malaysian government. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 97, 108-116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ministry of Higher Education, (2020). http://www.mohe.gov.my/en/media-mohe/pressstatement/1031-pengendalian-program-akademik-di-universiti-awam-ua-dan-institusipendidikan-tinggi-swasta-iptsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Siemens, G., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2015). Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Charrier, B., & Lerner-Sei, S. (2011). Rapport au temps et formation à distance. Un point de vue clinique. Distances et Savoirs, 3(9), 419-443. https://doi.org/10.3166/ds.9.419-443Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Denami, M. A., & Marquet, P. (2015). Le sentiment d'isolement en formation ouverte à distance (FOAD): quelle réalité, quelles conséquences? Frantice.net, 10, 47-63Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates, T. (2018). The 2017 national survey of online learning in Canadian post-secondary education: methodology and results. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0112-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Donovan, T., Bates, T., Seaman, J., Mayer, D., Martel, E., Paul, R., ..., & Poulin, R. (2019). Tracking online and distance education in Canadian universities and colleges: 2018. Vancouver BC: Canadian Digital Learning Research Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Manganello, C., Falsetti, C., & Leo, T. (2019). Self-regulated learning for web-enhanced control engineering education. Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 44-58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Guest, R., Rohde, N., Selvanathan, S., & Soesmanto, T. (2018). Student satisfaction and online teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1084-1093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452- 465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-zGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, Z. W., & Yeong, F. M. (2020). Online conferencing platform provides opportunity for reciprocal teaching. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(5), 471-472.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Smolinsky, L., Olafsson, G., Marx, B. D., & Wang, G. (2019). Online and handwritten homework in calculus for STEM majors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(6), 1513-1533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Engelbrecht and A. Harding, Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the Internet. Part 1: Technologies and Taxonomy, Educ. Stud. Math. 58 (2005), pp. 235–252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. A. Juan, M. Huertas, C. Steegmann, C. Corcoles, and C. Serrat, Mathematical e-learning: State of the art and experiences at the Open University of Catalonia, Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 39 (2008), pp. 455–471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Yushau, B. (2006). The effects of blended e-learning on mathematics and computer attitudes in pre-calculus algebra. The mathematics enthusiast, 3(2), 176-183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zakaria, E., & Salleh, T. S. (2015). Using technology in learning integral calculus. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Foong, W. S., & Mahmud, M. M. (2019, June). I Can Learn Calculus Virtually: Personalizing eLearn and Screencast-O-Matic in Blended Learning Environment. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Frontiers of Educational Technologies (pp. 13-19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The internet and higher education, 14(3), 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Richardson, J. C., Besser, E., Koehler, A., Lim, J., & Strait, M. (2016). Instructors’ perceptions of instructor presence in online learning environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4), 82-104. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2330Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Larbi-Siaw, O., & Owusu-Agyeman, Y. (2017). Miscellany of students’ satisfaction in an asynchronous learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(4), 456-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516667499Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wong, S. F., Mahmud, M. M., & Wong, S. S. (2020, April). Effectiveness of Formative E-assessment Procedure: Learning Calculus In Blended Learning Environment. In Proceedings of the 2020 8th International Conference on Communications and Broadband Networking (pp. 77-82).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Armellini, A., & De Stefani, M. (2016). Social presence in the 21st century: An adjustment to the Community of Inquiry framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1202- 1216. https://doi.org/10.3166/ds.9.313-330Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Matzakos, N. M., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2018). An analysis of first year engineering students’ satisfaction with a support distance learning program in mathematics. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 869-891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9641-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Bialowas, A., & Steimel, S. (2019). Less is more: Use of video to address the problem of teacher immediacy and presence in online courses. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(2), 354-364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Blackmon, S. J., & Major, C. (2012). Student experiences in online courses: A qualitative research synthesis. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(2), 77-85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Robinson, H. A., Kilgore, W., & Warren, S. J. (2017). Care, communication, support: Core for designing meaningful online collaborative learning. Online Learning, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1240Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Effect of Change to Asynchronous Mode of Learning Calculus in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              ICDEL '21: Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning
              May 2021
              330 pages
              ISBN:9781450390033
              DOI:10.1145/3474995

              Copyright © 2021 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 22 November 2021

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format