skip to main content
10.1145/3474995.3475022acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

X-Culture Project: Study on the Influencing Factors of Students' Collaboration Skills in Global Virtual Teams

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper is dedicated to the investigation of international online project influence on students’ collaboration skills development and students’ behavior toward professional discipline learning. The sample included 141 students who participated in the online X-culture project as a part of their professional discipline course. The research was carried out in the years 2019-2020. The students were surveyed every week during a 2-month length project. For the analysis, we used the answers of the first and the last surveys to determine the impact of the project. The results showed significant improvements in all indicators of Collaboration skills that confirmed the positive influence of the X-culture project. According to the correlation analysis, the collaboration skills indicators significantly predicted professional discipline testing results and final report grade (project results). Moreover, we conducted interviews with ten random students to reveal the influencing factors of the project and define whether the project changes students’ behavior toward professional discipline learning. Students confirmed the positive influence of working in a virtual team on their communication skills and general motivation to study the professional discipline. Thus, we confirmed the importance of implementing project activity into the courses of professional discipline due to substantial influence on collaboration skills development and higher engagement in the learning process.

References

  1. T. Baranova, A. Kobicheva, N. Olkhovik, and E. Tokareva. 2020. Analysis of the Communication Competence Dynamics in Integrated Learning. In: Anikina Z. (eds) Integrating Engineering Education and Humanities for Global Intercultural Perspectives. IEEHGIP 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 131. Springer, Cham doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-47415-7_45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T.A. Baranova, A.M. Kobicheva, and E.Y. Tokareva. 2019. Effects of an Integrated Learning Approach on Students' Outcomes in St. Petersburg Polytechnic University. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 77-81. doi.org/10.1145/3369199.3369245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. I. Zakharova, A. Kobicheva, and N. Rozova. 2019. Results Analysis of Russian Students’ Participation in the Online International Educational Project X-Culture. Educ. Sci., 9, 168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. W. Nuankaew, S. Bussaman, D. Teeraputon, and P. Nuankaew. 2021. Proactive Learning Culture: Practical Learning and Experience from Research into Senior Projects. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(2), 59-65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. C. Y. Lu, W. Elmaraghy, G. Schuh, and R. Wilhelm. 2007. A scientific foundation of collaborative engineering.  CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol., 56 (2), 605–634.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Y. Rosen, and M. Tager. 2012. Computer-Based Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving Skills: Human-to-Agent Versus Human-to-Human Approach. Pearson Education: Boston, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P.E. Griffin, B. McGaw, and E. Care. 2012. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H.F. O'Neil, S.H. Chuang Jr., and E.L. Baker. 2010. Computer-based feedback for computer-based collaborative problem solving. In Computer-Based Diagnostics and Systematic Analysis of Knowledge; edited by Ifenthaler, D., Pirnay-Dummer, P., Seel, N.M.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, pp. 261–279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Q. Li, and Y. Guan. 2020. Research on Effective Learning Strategies among Schools under Internet Environment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(1), 74-78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. I. Lyngstad. 2017. Legitimate, expert and referent power in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 22:8, 932-942, DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2015.1116442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C.M. Mowling, J. Sh. Brock, K.K. Eiler, and M.E. Rudisill. 2004. Student Motivation in Physical Education Breaking down Barriers. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 75:6, 40-45, DOI: 10.1080/07303084.2004.10607256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J.S. Katz, and B.R. Martin. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26 (1), 1-18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. D. Goleman. 2012. Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Random House Publishing Group: London, Great Britain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. E. Vance, and H. Smith. 2019. Essential Collaboration Skills: The ASCCR Frame for Collaboration. Journal of Statistics Education, 1-25. 10.1080/10691898.2019.1687370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. N.H. Frijda. 2004. Emotions and Action. In A. S. R. Manstead, N. Frijda, & A. Fischer (Eds.), Studies in emotion and social interaction. Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium, p. 158–173. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806582.010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A.H. Fischer, and G.A. Van Kleef. 2010. Where have all the people gone? A plea for including social interaction in emotion research. Emotion Review, 2, pp. 208-211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. K.A. Pekaar, D. van der Linden, A.B. Bakker, and M.Ph. Born. 2020. Dynamic self- and other-focused emotional intelligence: A theoretical framework and research agenda. Journal of Research in Personality, Volume 86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J.R. Boen, and D.A. Zahn. 1982. The Human Side of Statistical Consulting. Lifetime Learning Publications: Belmont, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A.B. Hoadley, and J.R. Kettenring.1990. Communications between Statisticians and Engineers/Physical Scientists. Technometrics, 32(3), 243–247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. E. B. Volodarskaya, A. S. Grishina and L. I. Pechinskaya, 2019. "Virtual Learning Environment in Lexical Skills Development for Active Vocabulary Expansion in Non-Language Students Who Learn English," 2019 12th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE), Kazan, Russia, pp. 388-392.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. T. Brown, M. Yu, and J. Etherington. 2020. Are Listening and Interpersonal Communication Skills Predictive of Professionalism in Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Students? Health Professions Education, 6 (2), pp. 187-200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. N. Caliskan. 2003. Sinif Ogretmenlerinin Sozel Olmayan Iletisim Davranislarinin Degerlendirilmesi. Unpublished Master Thesis, Ataturk University, Erzurum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. A.A. Ceyhan. 2006. An Investigation of Adjustement Levels of Turkish University Students With Respect to Perceived Communication Skill Levels. Social Behaviour and Personality, 34 (4), 367-379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. H. Ozkan, M. Dalli, E. Bingol, S.C. Metin, and D. Yarali. 2014. Examining the Relationship between the Communication Skills and Self-efficacy Levels of Physical Education Teacher Candidates. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, pp. 440-445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. B.L. Smith, and J.T. MacGregor. 1992. What is collaborative learning? In Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education; Goodsell, A., Maher, M., Tinto, V., Smith, B.L., MacGregor, J.T. (Eds.); University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. F. Henri. 1992. Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers; Kaye, A. (Ed.); Springer-Verlag: Berlin, pp. 117—136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. C. Vila, D. Ugarte, J. Ríos, and J. Abellan-Nebot. 2017. Project-based collaborative engineering learning to develop Industry 4.0 skills within a PLM framework. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1269-1276. 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. J. Ríos, F. Mas, M. Marcos, C. Vila, D. Ugarte, and T. Chevrot. 2016. Accelerating the adoption of Industry 4.0 supporting technologies in manufacturing engineering courses. Materials Science Forum 903, 100-111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. L. Dewi, N. Hanoum, and D. Mulyadi. 2020. PROBLEM BASED LEARNING TO ENHANCE STUDENTS' COLLABORATIVE SKILLS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. T. Oon-Seng. 2003. Problem-Based Learning Innovation. Using Problems to Power Learning in the 21st Century. Cengage Learning. A Divison of Cengage Learning Asia Pte. Ltd.: Singapore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. A.L. Ingram, and L.G. Hathorn. 2004. Methods for analyzing collaboration in online communications. In Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice; Roberts, T.S. (Ed.); Information Science Publishing: Hershey, PA, pp. 215—241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. T. Heinze, and S. Kuhlmann. 2008. Across institutional boundaries? – research collaboration in german public sector nanoscience. Research Policy, 37 (5), 888-899.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. H. Bukvova. 2010. Studying Research Collaboration: A Literature Review. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. V. Taras, P. Bryla, S. Gupta, A. Jimenez, M. Minor, M. Tim, X. Ordeñana, D. Rottig, R. Sarala, N. Zakaria, and S. Zdravkovic. 2012. Changing the face of International Business education: the X-Culture Project. AIB Insights, 12, 11-17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. S. Highhouse. 2002. A history of the T-group and its early applications in management development. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 6(4), pp. 277–290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. O. Hernández-Pozas, E. Salvaj, A. Jimenez, G. Sarfati, X. Ordeñana, B. Della, and A. Zweng-Villegas. 2015. Challenges and opportunities of the global classroom. The X-Culture project in Ibero America.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. J. Poór, C. Kollár, Z. Szira, V. Taras, and E. Varga. 2018. Central and Eastern European Experience of the X-Culture Project in Teaching International Management and Cross-Cultural Communication. Journal of Intercultural Management, 10, 5-41. 10.2478/joim-2018-0001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. P.C. Earley, and R.S. Peterson. 2004. The Elusive Cultural Chameleon: Cultural Intelligence as a New Approach to Intercultural Training for the Global Manager. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(1), pp.100–115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. M.A. Gonzalez-Perez, V. Cathro, D.V. Caprar, and V. Taras. 2014. Virtual Teams and International Business Teaching and Learning: The Case of the Global Enterprise Experience (GEE). Journal of Teaching in International Business, 25(3), pp. 200–213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. X-Culture Project: Study on the Influencing Factors of Students' Collaboration Skills in Global Virtual Teams
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICDEL '21: Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning
            May 2021
            330 pages
            ISBN:9781450390033
            DOI:10.1145/3474995

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 22 November 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format