skip to main content
10.1145/3474995.3475046acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigation on Computational Thinking of Normal Students Based on Technology Acceptance Model

Published:22 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Based on the technology acceptance model, this paper constructs a computational thinking acceptance model for normal students. Taking normal students from H Normal University as a research sample, the structural equation model is used to quantitatively analyze that model. The research results show that subjective norms, the usefulness and ease of use of computational thinking have a positive and significant impact on the attitude and behavioral intentions of normal students to use computational thinking.

References

  1. LI L. 2012. Computational thinking-concepts and challenges. J. China University Teaching. (January 2012), 7-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jeannette M. Wing. 2006. Computational Thinking. J. Communications of the ACM 3 (2006), 34-35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cynthia C. Selby, John Woollard. 2015.Computational Thinking: The Developing Definition. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/356481. 2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. REN Y, SUI F, LI F. 2016. Meeting Real Digital Natives: The Necessities and Possibilities of Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12. J. China Educational Technology. (January 2016), 2-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lye S Y, KOH J H L. Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? J. Computers in Human Behavior. 41, (2014), 51-61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. ISTE. Computational thinking competencies: Integrate CT across disciplines, with all students: CT competencies for educators. https://www.iste.org/standards/computational-thinking.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. CAO P, YU S. 2012. The proposal, research status and future development of digital natives. J. e-Education Research. (April 2012), 21-27Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis F. 1898. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. J. MIS Quarterly. (September 1898).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. VENKATESH V, Davis F D. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. J. Management science 46, 2 (2000), 186-204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Özgen Korkmaz. Cakir R. Özden M Y. 2017.A Validity and Reliability Study of the Computational Thinking Scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 72:558-569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bishop M J, Spector J M. 2013. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Vol. 817-818. Springer Science & Business Media.2013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. ISTE. Computational thinking competencies: Integrate CT across disciplines, with all students: CT competencies for educators. https://www.iste.org/standards/computational-thinking.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. FOENELL C, LARCKER D F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Journal of marketing research 18,1 (1981), 39-50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Christian, P. B., Marcos, R., & Gregorio, R. 2017. Development of Computational Thinking Skills Through Unplugged Activities in Primary School .Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education,2017, 65-72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Haseski, H. I., Ilic, U., & Tugtekin, U. 2018. Defining a New 21st Century Skill-Computational Thinking: Concepts and Trends. International Education Studies, 11(4): 29-42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hoyle R H. 1995. Structural equation mode ling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Vol. 158-176. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. ISTE. International Society for Technology in Education.2016. ISTE Standards for Students. http://www.iste.org/standards/standards/for-students.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ministry of Education. 2017. Information Technology Curriculum Standards for General High Schools (2017 Edition). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/s8001/201801/t20180115_324647.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICDEL '21: Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning
    May 2021
    330 pages
    ISBN:9781450390033
    DOI:10.1145/3474995

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 November 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format