skip to main content
10.1145/3475725.3483623acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Generic Few-Shot Solution for Food Shelf-Life Prediction using Meta-Learning

Published:20 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Checking the quality of agricultural produce at every step of its supply chain is the need of the hour to reduce food wastage. Manual checking of food quality at every step can be inconsistent and time consuming. Automation of food quality detection, using non-invasive imagery based techniques, needs availability of ample amount of annotated data to train models. Collecting such data in large quantity in a controlled lab setting is an expensive affair. More-over, providing a point solution for every individual food item by training food item specific models is an impractical solution. Thus, there is a need for a mechanism which would capture the common meta-level visual degradation properties across a set of food items belonging to a specific category and use this meta-knowledge to predict the quality of a new food item belonging to that category with a paucity of training data. To address this challenge, as a part of the preliminary work, we conduct an initial set of experiments to demonstrate the applicability of existing Model Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) algorithm for fruit freshness detection task. The results indicate that for such a task, meta-learning can serve to be a more generic and efficient solution than using few-shot transfer-learning technique and traditional ML based approaches requiring explicit feature engineering.

References

  1. NajahMAl-Mhanna, Holger Huebner, and Rainer Buchholz. 2018. Analysis of the sugar content in food products by using gas chromatography mass spectrometry and enzymatic methods. Foods 7, 11 (2018), 185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A Anushya. 2020. Quality recognition of banana images using classifiers. Int J Comput Sci Mob Comput 9, 1 (2020), 100--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sébastien MR Arnold, Praateek Mahajan, Debajyoti Datta, Ian Bunner, and Konstantinos Saitas Zarkias. 2020. learn2learn: A library for meta-learning research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.12284 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Swarnambiga Ayyachamy, Varghese Alex, Mahendra Khened, and Ganapathy Krishnamurthi. 2019. Medical image retrieval using Resnet-18. In Medical Imaging 2019: Imaging Informatics for Healthcare, Research, and Applications, Vol. 10954. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1095410.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornelius S Barry and James J Giovannoni. 2007. Ethylene and fruit ripening. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 26, 2 (2007), 143--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. F Cadet. 2014. Quantitative determination of sugar in fruits by different methods. Indian Journal of Chemistry (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacinth Nithya Devanesan, Alagusundaram Karuppiah, and CV Kavitha Abirami. 2011. Effect of storage temperatures, O2 concentrations and variety on respiration of mangoes. Journal of Agrobiology 28, 2 (2011), 119--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. 2017. Model-agnostic metalearning for fast adaptation of deep networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1126--1135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mingjun Li, Pengmin Li, Fengwang Ma, Abhaya M Dandekar, and Lailiang Cheng. 2018. Sugar metabolism and accumulation in the fruit of transgenic apple trees with decreased sorbitol synthesis. Horticulture research 5, 1 (2018), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Anusha Nagabandi, Ignasi Clavera, Simin Liu, Ronald S Fearing, Pieter Abbeel, Sergey Levine, and Chelsea Finn. 2019. Learning to adapt in dynamic, real-world environments through meta-reinforcement learning. Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mihai Oltean. 2018. Fruits 360 dataset. Mendeley Data (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Brian Rivera. [n.d.]. Fast Analysis of Sucrose, Glucose, and Fructose Composition in Fruit Juices and Processed Beverages using Simplified HPLC Methodology. ([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sirithon Siriamornpun and Niwat Kaewseejan. 2017. Quality, bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity of selected climacteric fruits with relation to their maturity. Scientia Horticulturae 221 (2017), 33--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Satyam Srivastava, Sachin Boyat, and Shashikant Sadistap. 2014. A novel vision sensing system for tomato quality detection. International journal of food science 2014 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Generic Few-Shot Solution for Food Shelf-Life Prediction using Meta-Learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        AI & Food'21: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on AIxFood
        October 2021
        29 pages
        ISBN:9781450386739
        DOI:10.1145/3475725

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 October 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Upcoming Conference

        MM '24
        MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
        October 28 - November 1, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader