skip to main content
10.1145/3475992.3475993acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbiotcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

DeExam: A Decentralized Exam Administration Model using Public Blockchain

Published:02 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In exams, which are intended to evaluate capability, it is practically difficult to detect errors or mistakes made by test providers and scorers, as the correct/incorrect decision logic is often not disclosed. Therefore, we propose a sustainable exam administration model with enhanced reliability and transparency, utilizing a public blockchain, without a centralized authority. The blockchain records the hash values of the correct answers, decision condition, and decision result, which cannot be tampered with afterward. We implemented our proposed method using Bitcoin Core and used it to conduct a CTF (Capture The Flag) competition with over 100 participants. No fatal flaws were observed, thereby confirming the viability of the method.

References

  1. S.Yamasaki, S. Azuchi, and S. Tanaka. 2017. Blockchain Programming, Kodansha (in Japanese)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. H. Shen and Y. Xiao. 2018. Research on Online Quiz Scheme Based on Double-Layer Consortium Blockchain. in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Information Tech. in Medicine and Education (ITME). Hangzhou, China, 956-960. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITME.2018.00213Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Tentea and V. M. Ionescu. 2019. Online quiz implementation using blockchain technology for result tampering prevention. in Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI). Pitesti, Romania, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECAI46879.2019.9041980Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Islam, M. F. Kader, and S. Y. Shin. 2019. BSSSQS: A Blockchain-Based Smart and Secured Scheme for Question Sharing in the Smart Education System. Journal of Information and Communication Convergence Engineering, 17 (3) 174–184. https://doi.org/10.6109/JICCE.2019.17.3.174Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. L. McDaniel, E. Talvi, and B. Hay. 2016. Capture the Flag as Cyber Security Introduction. in Proc. 49th Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, 5479-5486, https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.677Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Leune and S. J. Petrilli, Jr. 2017. Using Capture-the-Flag to Enhance the Effectiveness of Cybersecurity Education. in Proc. 18th Annual Conf. on Information Tech. Education (SIGITE ’17). New York, NY, 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125659.3125686Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. W. Prabawa, E. Junaeti, and Y. Permana. 2017. Using capture the flag in classroom: Game-based implementation in network security learning. in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Science in Information Tech. (ICSITech). Bandung, 690-695. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSITech.2017.8257201Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Yoshimura. 2018. Bitcoin based CTF. https://y-yu.github.io/bitcoin-ctf-slide/bitcoin ctf.pdf (in Japanese)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. lotz84. 2018. Capture The Flag by Solidity. http://lotz84.hatenablog.com/entry/2018/01/02/134056 (in Japanese)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Matias, P. Barbosa, T. N. C. Cardoso, D. M. Campos, and D. F. Aranha. 2018. NIZKCTF: A Noninteractive Zero-Knowledge Capture-the-Flag Platform. IEEE Security & Privacy. 16 (6) 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSEC.2018.2875324Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Kaneko, S. Osada, S. Azuchi, H. Okada, and S. Yamasaki. 2019. A Management Method of Interest-rate in UTXO Model. in Proc. 2019 IEEE Social Implications of Tech. (SIT) and Information Management (SITIM). 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIM.2019.8910267Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. G. Andresen. 2012. Pay to Script Hash. Bitcoin Improvement Proposal, BIP-16. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0016.mediawikiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Todd. 2014. OP CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY. Bitcoin Improvement Proposal, BIP-65. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0065.mediawikiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Blockchain Explorer. https://www.blockchain.com/en/explorerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    BIOTC '21: Proceedings of the 2021 3rd Blockchain and Internet of Things Conference
    July 2021
    82 pages
    ISBN:9781450389518
    DOI:10.1145/3475992

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 2 October 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format