skip to main content
10.1145/3476883.3520225acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-seConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can you smell me now: towards a remote olfactory study

Published:04 May 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The sense of smell-olfaction involves the natural processing of ambient information in real-time. This process allows humans to detect danger, identify familiarities, and form lasting memories. During the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers were presented with challenges related to conducting in-person olfactory-based user studies. In this paper, we explore user experience and perception during olfactory-based interactions (OBI). Based upon previous literature, we propose an approach to offer future researchers a methodology for conducting olfactory-based user studies remotely. In particular, we explored a paper prototyping medium as an olfactory display. This experiment demonstrates the remote investigation of a complex sensory functionality during high mental workload levels while participants (N=12) engage in an online memory game. Furthermore, this work seeks to inspire further discussion of olfactory-based user studies that explore functions related to human moods, memory, and behavior.

References

  1. Oluwakemi A. Ademoye and Gheorghita Ghinea. 2013. Information Recall Task Impact in Olfaction-enhanced Multimedia. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 9, 3, Article 17 (July 2013), 16 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Judith Amores and Pattie Maes. 2017. Essence: Olfactory Interfaces for Unconscious Influence of Mood and Cognitive Performance. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 28--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Anat Arzi, Limor Shedlesky, Mor Ben-Shaul, Khitam Nasser, Arie Oksenberg, Ilana S. Hairston, and Noam Sobel. 2012. Humans Can Learn New Information During Sleep. Nature Neuroscience 15, 10 (2012), 1460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Suomiya Bao and Toshimasa Yamanaka. 2015. The Effects of Scents on Emotion and Performance in User Experience of Application Software. International Journal of Affective Engineering (2015), IJAE-D. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Shannon Barker, Pamela Grayhem, Jerrod Koon, Jessica Perkins, Allison Whalen, and Bryan Raudenbush. 2003. Improved Performance on Clerical Tasks Associated with Administration of Peppermint Odor. Perceptual and Motor Skills 97, 3 (2003), 1007--1010. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.97.3.1007 PMID: 14738372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gérard Brand and Jean-Louis Millot. 2001. Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: Between Evidence and Enigma. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B 54, 3b (2001), 259--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dipesh Chaudhury, Laura Manella, Adolfo Arellanos, Olga Escanilla, Thomas A. Cleland, and Christiane Linster. 2010. Olfactory Bulb Habituation to Odor Stimuli. Behavioral Neuroscience 124, 4 (2010), 490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Miguel A. Diego, Nancy Aaron Jones, Tiffany Field, Maria Hernandez-reif, Saul Schanberg, Cynthia Kuhn, Mary Galamaga, Virginia McAdam, and Robert Galamaga. 1998. Aromatherapy Positively Affects Mood, Eeg Patterns of Alertness and Math Computations. International Journal of Neuroscience 96, 3-4 (1998), 217--224. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.3109/00207459808986469 PMID: 10069621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Susanne Diekelmann and Jan Born. 2010. The Memory Function of Sleep. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11, 2 (2010), 114--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Huong Q. Dinh, Neff Walker, Larry F. Hodges, Chang Song, and Akira Kobayashi. 1999. Evaluating the Importance of Multi-sensory Input on Memory and the Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316). IEEE, 222--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dmitrijs Dmitrenko, Emanuela Maggioni, Chi Thanh Vi, and Marianna Obrist. 2017. What Did I Sniff? Mapping Scents Onto Driving-related Messages. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 154--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Stuart Firestein. 2001. How the Olfactory System Makes Sense of Scents. Nature 413, 6852 (2001), 211--218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gheorghita Ghinea and Oluwakemi Ademoye. 2012. The Sweet Smell of Success: Enhancing Multimedia Applications with Olfaction. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 8, 1, Article 2 (Feb. 2012), 17 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Frederica Gonçalves, Diogo Cabral, and Pedro Campos. 2018. CreaSenses: Fostering Creativity Through Olfactory Cues. In Proceedings of the 36th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (Utrecht, Netherlands) (ECCE'18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nicolas S. Herrera and Ryan P. McMahan. 2014. Development of a Simple and Low-cost Olfactory Display for Immersive Media Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Immersive Media Experiences (Orlando, Florida, USA) (ImmersiveMe '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Leslie M. Kay. 2011. Olfactory Coding: Random Scents Make Sense. Current Biology 21, 22 (2011), R928--R929. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Joseph Kaye. 2004. Making Scents: Aromatic Output for HCI. Interactions 11, 1 (2004), 48--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Maria Larsson, Deborah Finkel, and Nancy L. Pedersen. 2000. Odor Identification: Influences of Age, Gender, Cognition, and Personality. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 55, 5 (2000), P304--P310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jörn Lötsch, Dario Kringel, and Thomas Hummel. 2018. Machine Learning in Human Olfactory Research. Chemical Senses 44, 1 (10 2018), 11--22. arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/chemse/article-pdf/44/1/11/27170714/bjy067.pdf Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Emanuela Maggioni, Robert Cobden, Dmitrijs Dmitrenko, and Marianna Obrist. 2018. Smell-O-Message: Integration of Olfactory Notifications into a Messaging Application to Improve Users' Performance. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (Boulder, CO, USA) (ICMI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jeffrey S. Martzke, Lili C. Kopala, and Kimberley P. Good. 1997. Olfactory Dysfunction in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Review and Methodological Considerations. Biological Psychiatry (1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ruth McCaffrey, Debra J. Thomas, and Ann Orth Kinzelman. 2009. The Effects of Lavender and Rosemary Essential Oils on Test-taking Anxiety Among Graduate Nursing Students. Holistic Nursing Practice 23, 2 (2009), 88--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mark Moss, Jenny Cook, Keith Wesnes, and Paul Duckett. 2003. Aromas of Rosemary and Lavender Essential Oils Differentially Affect Cognition and Mood in Healthy Adults. International Journal of Neuroscience 113, 1 (2003), 15--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Niall Murray, Yuansong Qiao, Brian Lee, A. K. Karunakar, and Gabriel-Miro Muntean. 2013. Subjective Evaluation of Olfactory and Visual Media Synchronization. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (Oslo, Norway) (MMSys '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 162--171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. William H. Redd, Sharon L. Manne, Bruce Peters, Paul B. Jacobsen, and Hilary Schmidt. 1994. Fragrance Administration to Reduce Anxiety During MR Imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 4, 4 (1994), 623--626. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Marc Rettig. 1994. Prototyping for Tiny Fingers. Commun. ACM 37, 4 (April 1994), 21--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Emmanuelle Richard, Angèle Tijou, Paul Richard, and J-L Ferrier. 2006. Multi-modal Virtual Environments for Education with Haptic and Olfactory Feedback. Virtual Reality 10, 3-4 (2006), 207--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Sylvia Schablitzky and Bettina M Pause. 2014. Sadness Might Isolate You in a Non-smelling World: Olfactory Perception and Depression. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014), 45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Regina M. Sullivan, Donald A. Wilson, Nadine Ravel, and Anne-Marie Mouly. 2015. Olfactory Memory Networks: From Emotional Learning to Social Behaviors. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 9 (2015), 36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. David Warnock, Marilyn McGee-Lennon, and Stephen Brewster. 2013. Multiple Notification Modalities and Older Users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1091--1094. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown. 1997. The Coming Age of Calm Technology. Beyond Calculation (1997), 75--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Tomoya Yamada, Satoshi Yokoyama, Tomohiro Tanikawa, Koichi Hirota, and Michitaka Hirose. 2006. Wearable Olfactory Display: Using Odor in Outdoor Environment. In IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR 2006). IEEE, 199--206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang Yiyuan. 2015. Creation Methodology of Interactive Art Installation Based on Philosophy-Understanding Projection: Recreation of Traditional Chinese Painting. In Proceedings of the 2015 Virtual Reality International Conference (Laval, France) (VRIC '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Can you smell me now: towards a remote olfactory study

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ACM SE '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Southeast Conference
          April 2022
          267 pages
          ISBN:9781450386975
          DOI:10.1145/3476883

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 May 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate178of377submissions,47%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)44
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader