skip to main content
10.1145/3477206.3477481acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnanocomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Age of Information in In-Body Nano Communication Networks

Published:17 September 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The use of nanobots and in-body nano communication techniques offer manifold options for next generation health care and precision medicine. Scientific progress allows to place nanobots in the human circulatory system and enabled them to exchange data and information among each other as well as to external gateway systems. One of the frequently asked questions is how to identify the optimal number of bots for a task, monitoring frequencies, and communication technologies. In this paper, we introduce and study the age of information (AoI) as a comprehensive metric for describing the performance of in-body nano communication networks. We use the AoI concept in an in-body measurement scenario. Our results clearly demonstrate that AoI is a very helpful tool to study the performance of in-body nano communication networks.

References

  1. Ian F. Akyildiz and Josep Miquel Jornet. 2010. The Internet of Nano-Things. IEEE Wireless Communications 17, 6 (Dec. 2010), 58--63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2010.5675779Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Falko Dressler and Stefan Fischer. 2015. Connecting In-Body Nano Communication with Body Area Networks: Challenges and Opportunities of the Internet of Nano Things. Elsevier Nano Communication Networks 6 (June 2015), 29--38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2015.01.006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Regine Geyer, Marc Stelzner, Florian Büther, and Sebastian Ebers. 2018. BloodVoyagerS: Simulation of the Work Environment of Medical Nanobots. In ACM NANOCOM 2018. ACM, Reykjavík, Iceland, 5:1-5:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3233188.3233196Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Antzela Kosta, Nikolaos Pappas, and Vangelis Angelakis. 2017. Age of Information: A New Concept, Metric, and Tool. Foundations and Trends® in Networking 12, 3 (Nov. 2017), 162--259. https://doi.org/10.1561/1300000060Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Anke Kuestner, Lukas Stratmann, Regine Wendt, Stefan Fischer, and Falko Dressler. 2020. A Simulation Framework for Connecting In-Body Nano Communication with Out-of-Body Devices. In ACM NANOCOM 2020. ACM, Virtual Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411295.3411308Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Roy D. Yates and Sanjit K. Kaul. 2019. The Age of Information: Real-Time Status Updating by Multiple Sources. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 65, 3 (March 2019), 1807--1827. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2018.2871079Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Age of Information in In-Body Nano Communication Networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        NANOCOM '21: Proceedings of the Eight Annual ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication
        September 2021
        179 pages
        ISBN:9781450387101
        DOI:10.1145/3477206

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 September 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        NANOCOM '21 Paper Acceptance Rate13of22submissions,59%Overall Acceptance Rate97of135submissions,72%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader