skip to main content
10.1145/3477314.3507037acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Incremental communication patterns in blockchain online social media

Published:06 May 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online Social Networking platforms are now more than ever part of people's everyday life. They often act as the medium through which people can communicate or discover engaging media. In recent years, thanks to the massive popularity gained by blockchain technology, a new generation of social media emerged. Steemit, one of the most well-known blockchain-based social networks, is based on the blockchain Steem. It employs the blockchain in two ways: as data storage, and to implement a rewarding mechanism for pieces of content that are relevant to the users. Employing a rewarding system based on the social activity of the users can have a strong impact on how people socialise. In this work, we study the interaction among the users of Steemit in terms of incremental patterns. In detail, we propose a set of incremental patterns, by using variants of patterns proposed in the literature and by defining a new pattern specifically thought for the scenario of Blockchain Online Social Media (BOSM). This paper's findings show that social interactions in BOSMs are highly conditioned by the presence of bots, and the patterns proposed can detect previously undetected complex interactions.

References

  1. Sonja Buchegger, Doris Schiöberg, Le-Hung Vu, and Anwitaman Datta. 2009. PeerSoN: P2P social networking: early experiences and insights. In Proceedings of ACM EuroSys Workshop on Social Network Systems. 46--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Carole Cadwalladr and Emma Graham-Harrison. 2018. Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The guardian 17 (2018), 22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jean Creusefond and Remy Cazabet. 2017. Characterising inter and intra-community interactions in link streams using temporal motifs. In Workshop on Complex Networks CompleNet. 81--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Leucio Antonio Cutillo, Refik Molva, and Thorsten Strufe. 2009. Safebook: A privacy-preserving online social network leveraging on real-life trust. IEEE Communications Magazine 47, 12 (2009), 94--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Anwitaman Datta, Sonja Buchegger, Le-Hung Vu, Thorsten Strufe, and Krzysztof Rzadca. 2010. Decentralized online social networks. In Handbook of social network technologies and applications. 349--378.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbara Guidi. 2020. When Blockchain meets Online Social Networks. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 62 (2020), 101131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Barbara Guidi, Tobias Amft, Andrea De Salve, Kalman Graffi, and Laura Ricci. 2015. DiDuSoNet: A P2P architecture for distributed Dunbar-based social networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications (2015), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbara Guidi and Andrea Michienzi. 2021. Dynamic Community Structure in Online Social Groups. Information 12, 3 (2021), 113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Barbara Guidi, Andrea Michienzi, and Laura Ricci. 2020. Steem Blockchain: Mining the Inner Structure of the Graph. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 210251--210266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Barbara Guidi, Andrea Michienzi, and Andrea De Salve. 2020. Community evaluation in Facebook groups. Multim. Tools Appl. 79, 45--46 (2020), 33603--33622.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Petter Holme and Jari Saramäki. 2012. Temporal networks. Physics reports 519, 3 (2012), 97--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Yuriy Hulovatyy, Huili Chen, and Tijana Milenković. 2015. Exploring the structure and function of temporal networks with dynamic graphlets. Bioinformatics 31, 12 (2015), i171--i180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lauri Kovanen, Kimmo Kaski, János Kertész, and Jari Saramäki. 2013. Temporal motifs reveal homophily, gender-specific patterns, and group talk in call sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2013), 201307941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jiali Lin, Zhenyu Li, Dong Wang, Kavé Salamatian, and Gaogang Xie. 2012. Analysis and comparison of interaction patterns in online social network and social media. In 2012 21st ICCCN. 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kai Liu, William K. Cheung, and Jiming Liu. 2013. Detecting Stochastic Temporal Network Motifs for Human Communication Patterns Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM ASONAM. 533--540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Andrea Michienzi, Barbara Guidi, Laura Ricci, and Andrea De Salve. 2021. Incremental communication patterns in online social groups. Knowledge and Information Systems 63, 6 (2021), 1339--1364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ron Milo et al. 2002. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298, 5594 (2002), 824--827.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lucia Nasti, Andrea Michienzi, and Barbara Guidi. 2021. Discovering the Impact of Notifications on Social Network Addiction. In From Data to Models and Back. 72--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ursula Redmond, Martin Harrigan, and Pádraig Cunningham. 2012. Identifying time-respecting subgraphs in temporal networks. In Proceedings of the ECML PKDD. 51--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiajing Wu, Jieli Liu, Weili Chen, Huawei Huang, Zibin Zheng, and Yan Zhang. 2020. Detecting Mixing Services via Mining Bitcoin Transaction Network with Hybrid Motifs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.05233 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Qi Xuan, Huiting Fang, Chenbo Fu, and Vladimir Filkov. 2015. Temporal motifs reveal collaboration patterns in online task-oriented networks. Physical Review E 91, 5 (2015), 052813.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Yilin Zhang et al. 2018. Discovering political topics in Facebook discussion threads with graph contextualization. Annals of Applied Statistics 12, 2 (2018), 1096--1123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Yi-Qing Zhang, Xiang Li, Jian Xu, and Athanasios V Vasilakos. 2015. Human interactive patterns in temporal networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 45, 2 (2015), 214--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Qiankun Zhao et al. 2010. Communication motifs: a tool to characterize social communications. In Proceedings of ACM CIKM. 1645--1648.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Matteo Zignani et al. 2018. Temporal Communication Motifs in Mobile Cohesive Groups. In Proceedings of 6th CNA. 490--501.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Incremental communication patterns in blockchain online social media

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '22: Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
        April 2022
        2099 pages
        ISBN:9781450387132
        DOI:10.1145/3477314

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 May 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader