skip to main content
10.1145/3477314.3507096acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Paper

Optimization of IoT slices in wifi enterprise networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 May 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The increasing number of differentiated IoT services introduced to wireless networks are coming with diverse and sometimes conflicting requirements. Network slicing in 5G is the key feature to address these requirements. However, slicing is mainly intended for cellular networks, and adopting it for WiFi networks is challenging due to the lack of wireless virtualization supports in hardware. This paper proposes a new slicing solution for WiFi enterprise networks that require no virtualization support. Our solution relies on a dynamic user association mechanism that takes into account different IoT requirements. We formulate an optimization problem that maximizes the total throughput of the network with respect to different IoT requirements. To solve this high-complexity problem, a stable matching mechanism algorithm has been proposed to obtain the optimized solution in near real-time. We also advocate a Reinforcement Learning algorithm that enables practical implementations and employs a learning framework to learn different network dynamics. Simulation results show that the proposed solutions approximate the optimal results and outperform the traditional RSSI approaches while guaranteeing the requirements of different IoT slices.

References

  1. Ibrahim Afolabi, Tarik Taleb, Konstantinos Samdanis, Adlen Ksentini, and Hannu Flinck. 2018. Network Slicing and Softwarization: A Survey on Principles, Enabling Technologies, and Solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials 20, 3 (2018), 2429--2453.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Rizwana Ahmad, Mohammad Dehghani Soltani, Majid Safari, Anand Srivastava, and Abir Das. 2020. Reinforcement Learning Based Load Balancing for Hybrid LiFi WiFi Networks. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 132273--132284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Rashid Ali, Yousaf Bin Zikria, Sahil Garg, Ali Kashif Bashir, Mohammad S. Obaidat, and Hyung Seok Kim. 2021. A Federated Reinforcement Learning Framework for Incumbent Technologies in Beyond 5G Networks. IEEE Network 35, 4 (2021), 152--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Suzan Bayhan and Anatolij Zubow. 2017. Optimal Mapping of Stations to Access Points in Enterprise Wireless Local Area Networks. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Pablo Caballero, Albert Banchs, Gustavo de Veciana, and Xavier Costa-Pérez. 2017. Network slicing games: Enabling customization in multi-tenant networks. In IEEE INFOCOM 2017 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Maxweel Carmo, Sandino Jardim, Augusto Neto, Rui Aguiar, Daniel Corujo, and Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues. 2018. Slicing WiFi WLAN-Sharing Access Infrastructures to Enhance Ultra-Dense 5G Networking. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Boutheina Dab, Nadjib Aitsaadi, and Rami Langar. 2019. Q-Learning Algorithm for Joint Computation Offloading and Resource Allocation in Edge Cloud. In 2019 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM). 45--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Foroutan Fami, Chuan Pham, and Kim-Khoa Nguyen. 2020. Towards IoT Slicing for Centralized WLANs in Enterprise Networks. In 2020 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Yunan Gu, Walid Saad, Mehdi Bennis, Merouane Debbah, and Zhu Han. 2015. Matching theory for future wireless networks: fundamentals and applications. IEEE Communications Magazine 53, 5 (2015), 52--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Blas Gómez, Estefanía Coronado, José Villalón, Roberto Riggio, and Antonio Garrido. 2020. User Association in Software-Defined Wi-Fi Networks for Enhanced Resource Allocation. In 2020 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. IEEE. 2016. IEEE Standard for Information technology---Telecommunications and information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area networks---Specific requirements - Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications. IEEE Std 802.11-2016 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.11-2012) (2016), 1--3534.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Leonhard Korowajczuk. 2011. Wireless LAN. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chapter 12, 311--339. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781119970460.ch12 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jeongho Kwak, Joonyoung Moon, Hyang-Won Lee, and Long Bao Le. 2017. Dynamic network slicing and resource allocation for heterogeneous wireless services. In 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC). 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Pedro Paulo Libório, Chan Tong Lam, Benjamin Ng, Daniel L. Guidoni, Marilia Curado, and Leandro A. Villas. 2021. Airtime Aware Dynamic Network Slicing for Heterogeneous IoT Services in IEEE 802.11ah. In 2021 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G Bellemare, Alex Graves, Martin Riedmiller, Andreas K Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, et al. 2015. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518, 7540 (02 2015), 529--533. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Matías Richart, Javier Baliosian, Joan Serrat, and Juan-Luis Gorricho. 2016. Resource Slicing in Virtual Wireless Networks: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management 13, 3 (2016), 462--476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Matías Richart, Javier Baliosian, Joan Serrat, and Juan-Luis Gorricho. 2020. Resource Allocation and Management Techniques for Network Slicing in WiFi Networks. In NOMS 2020 - 2020 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium. 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Matías Richart, Javier Baliosian, Joan Serrat, Juan-Luis Gorricho, and Ramón Agüero. 2020. Slicing With Guaranteed Quality of Service in WiFi Networks. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management 17, 3 (2020), 1822--1837. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Alvin E. Roth. 2008. Deferred acceptance algorithms: history, theory, practice, and open questions. International Journal of Game Theory 36, 1 (2008), 537--569. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. 2017. Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms. ArXiv abs/1707.06347 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Optimization of IoT slices in wifi enterprise networks
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SAC '22: Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
            April 2022
            2099 pages
            ISBN:9781450387132
            DOI:10.1145/3477314

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 6 May 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader