skip to main content
editorial
Free access

Limited domains considered useful

Published: 23 July 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Limited domains were defined conceptually in RFC 8799 to cater to requirements and behaviours that extend the dominant view of IP packet delivery in the Internet. This paper argues not only that limited domains have been with us from the very beginning of the Internet but also that they have been shaping innovation of Internet technologies ever since, and will continue to do so. In order to build limited domains that successfully interoperate with the existing Internet, we propose an architectural framework as a blueprint. We discuss the role of the IETF in ensuring continued innovation in Internet technologies by embracing the wider research community's work on limited domain technology, leading to our key insight that Limited Domains are not only considered useful but a must to sustain innovation.

References

[1]
M. Behringer, M. Pritikin, S. Bjarnason, A. Clemm, B. Carpenter, S. Jiang, and L. Ciavaglia. 2015. Autonomic Networking: Definitions and Design Goals. RFC 7575. IETF. http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7575.txt
[2]
M. Boucadair, R. Penno, and D. Wing. 2013. Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) Internet Gateway Device - Port Control Protocol Interworking Function (IGD-PCP IWF). RFC 6970. IETF.
[3]
R. Braden, L. Zhang, S. Berson, S. Herzog, and S. Jamin. 1997. Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1 Functional Specification. RFC 2205. IETF.
[4]
Scott Bradner and Allison Mankin (Eds.). 1996. IPng - Internet Protocol Next Generation. Addison-Wesley.
[5]
C. Fine C. Vaishnav. 2006. A dynamic assessment of VoIP innovation, adoption and their interaction with CALEA regulation. In Technology Policy Research Conference.
[6]
B. Carpenter. 2014. IP addresses considered harmful. In ACM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 44. ACM. Issue 2.
[7]
B. Carpenter and B. Liu. 2020. Limited Domains and Internet Protocols. RFC 8799. IETF.
[8]
Cisco. 2020. Cisco Annual Internet Report (2018-2023) White Paper. Technical Report.
[9]
T. Clausen and P. Jacquet. 2003. Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR). RFC 3626. IETF. http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3626.txt
[10]
A. Falk V. Pingali D. Clark, R. Braden. 2003. FARA: Reorganizing the Addressing Architecture. In Workshop on future Directions in Network Architecture (FNDA) at ACM SIGCOMM.
[11]
K. Sollins R. Braden D. Clark, J. Wroclawski. 2002. Tussle in Cyberspace: Defining Tomorrow's Internet. In ACM SIGCOMM.
[12]
A. Farrel D. King, D. Jang. 2021a. Challenges for the Internet Routing Infrastructure Introduced by Changes in Address Semantics. Technical Report.
[13]
D. Jang D. King, A. Farrel. 2021b. A Survey of Semantic Internet Routing Techniques. Technical Report.
[14]
M. Reed M. Al-Naday J. Riihijarvi D. Trossen, S. Robitzsch. 2020. Internet Services over ICN in 5G LAN Environments. Technical Report.
[15]
C. Gomez, J. Crowcroft, and M. Scharf. 2021. TCP Usage Guidance in the Internet of Things (IoT). RFC 9006. IETF.
[16]
J. Halpern and C. Pignataro. 2015. Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture. RFC 7665. IETF.
[17]
M. Handley, H. Schulzrinne, E. Schooler, and J. Rosenberg. 1999. SIP: Session Initiation Protocol. RFC 2543. IETF.
[18]
D. Trossen I. Brown, D. Clark. 2010. Should Specific Values Be Embedded In The Internet Architecture?. In ACM Conext Workshop on Re-Architecting the Internet.
[19]
R. Mortier T. Roscoe-A. Warfield J. Crowcroft, S. Hand. 2003. Plutarch: An Argument for Network Pluralism. In Workshop on future Directions in Network Architecture (FNDA) at ACM SIGCOMM.
[20]
V. Jacobson. 1990. Compressing TCP/IP Headers for Low-Speed Serial Links. RFC 1144. IETF.
[21]
Sun Q. Farrer I. Bo Y. Jiang, S. and T. Yang. 2013. Analysis of Semantic Embedded IPv6 Address Schemas. Technical Report.
[22]
S. Khattak. 2017. Characterization of Internet censorship from multiple perspectives. Technical Report.
[23]
B. Carpenter T. Eckert L. Ciavaglia J. Nobre M. Behringer, Ed. 2021. A Reference Model for Autonomic Networking. RFC 8993. IETF.
[24]
N. Thomos D. Trossen G. Petropoulos S. Spirou M. J. Reed, M. Al-Naday. 2016. Stateless multicast switching in software defined networks. In IEEE ICC.
[25]
T. Eckert M.Behringer K. Watsen M. Pritikin, M. Richardson. 2021. Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI). RFC 8995. IETF.
[26]
K. Nichols, S. Blake, F. Baker, and D. Black. 1998. Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers. RFC 2474. IETF.
[27]
OASIS. 2019. MQTT Version 5.0. Technical Report. OASIS. https://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v5.0/mqtt-v5.0.html
[28]
C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, and S. Das. 2003. Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing. RFC 3561. IETF. http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt
[29]
L. Peterson, B. Davie, and R. van Brandenburg. 2014. Framework for Content Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI). RFC 7336. IETF.
[30]
Y. Tian X. Gong R. Moskowitz R. Shoushou, D. Yu. 2019. Routing and Addressing with Length Variable IP Address. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2019 Workshop on Networking for Emerging Applications and Technologies (NEAT'19).
[31]
S. Bjarnason T. Eckert, M. Behringer. 2021. An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP). RFC 8994. IETF.
[32]
H. Balakrishnan N. Feamster I. Ganichev A. Ghodsi P. B. Godfrey N. McKeown G. Parulkar B. Raghavan J. Rexford S. Arianfar D. Kuptsov T. Koponen, S. Shenker. 2011. Architecting for Innovation. In ACM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 41. ACM. Issue 3.
[33]
L. Iannone D. Eastlake Peng Liu Y. Jia, D. Trossen. 2021. Challenging Scenarios and Problems in Internet Addressing. Technical Report.
[34]
L. Yong, L. Dunbar, M. Toy, A. Isaac, and V. Manral. 2017. Use Cases for Data Center Network Virtualization Overlay Networks. RFC 8151. IETF.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Scheme to Introduce New Reachability Domains on the Internet2023 IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference (IPCCC)10.1109/IPCCC59175.2023.10253848(391-396)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2023

Index Terms

  1. Limited domains considered useful

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
    ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 51, Issue 3
    July 2021
    45 pages
    ISSN:0146-4833
    DOI:10.1145/3477482
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 July 2021
    Published in SIGCOMM-CCR Volume 51, Issue 3

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. IETF
    2. IRTF
    3. addressing
    4. limited domains
    5. routing

    Qualifiers

    • Editorial

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)111
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
    Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)A Scheme to Introduce New Reachability Domains on the Internet2023 IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference (IPCCC)10.1109/IPCCC59175.2023.10253848(391-396)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2023

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media