skip to main content
10.1145/3477495.3531681acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Improving Fairness and Transparency for Artists in Music Recommender Systems

Published:07 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Streaming services have become one of today's main sources of music consumption, with music recommender systems (MRS) as important components. The MRS' choices strongly influence what users consume, and vice versa. Therefore, there is a growing interest in ensuring the fairness of these choices for all stakeholders involved. Firstly, for users, unfairness might result in some users receiving lower-quality recommendations in terms of accuracy and coverage. Secondly, item provider (i.e. artist) unfairness might result in some artists receiving less exposure, and therefore less revenue. However, it is challenging to improve fairness without a decrease in, for instance, overall recommendation quality or user satisfaction. Additional complications arise when balancing possibly domain-specific objectives for multiple stakeholders at once. While fairness research exists from both the user and artist perspective in the music domain, there is a lack of research directly consulting artists---with Ferraro et al. (2021) as an exception.

When interacting with recommendation systems and evaluating their fairness, the many factors influencing recommendation system decisions can cause another difficulty: lack of transparency. Artists indicate they would appreciate more transparency in MRS---both towards the user and themselves. While e.g. Millecamp et al. (2019) use explanations to increase transparency for MRS users, to the best of our knowledge, no research has addressed improving transparency for artists this way.

References

  1. Giandomenico Cornacchia, Francesco M. Donini, Fedelucio Narducci, Claudio Pomo, and Azzurra Ragone. 2021. Explanation in Multi-Stakeholder Recommendation for Enterprise Decision Support Systems. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops. Springer, Cham, 39--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Michael D. Ekstrand, Anubrata Das, Robin Burke, and Fernando Diaz. 2022. Fairness in Information Access Systems (to appear). Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval (2022), 92 pages. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.05779Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Andres Ferraro, Xavier Serra, and Christine Bauer. 2021. What Is Fair? Exploring the Artists' Perspective on the Fairness of Music Streaming Platforms. In 8th IFIP TC 13 International Conference (Bari, Italy) (INTERACT 2021). Springer, Cham, 562--584. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85616-8_33Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Alessandro B. Melchiorre, Navid Rekabsaz, Emilia Parada-Cabaleiro, Stefan Brandl, Oleg Lesota, and Markus Schedl. 2021. Investigating gender fairness of recommendation algorithms in the music domain. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 58, 5, Article 102666 (2021), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102666Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Martijn Millecamp, Nyi Nyi Htun, Cristina Conati, and Katrien Verbert. 2019. To Explain or Not to Explain: The Effects of Personal Characteristics When Explaining Music Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Marina del Ray, CA, USA) (IUI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 397--407. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improving Fairness and Transparency for Artists in Music Recommender Systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '22: Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
        July 2022
        3569 pages
        ISBN:9781450387323
        DOI:10.1145/3477495

        Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 July 2022

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader