skip to main content
10.1145/3477495.3531866acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Diversity Vs Relevance: A Practical Multi-objective Study in Luxury Fashion Recommendations

Published:07 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Personalized algorithms focusing uniquely on accuracy might provide highly relevant recommendations, but the recommended items could be too similar to current users' preferences. Therefore, recommenders might prevent users from exploring new products and brands (filter bubbles). This is especially critical for luxury fashion recommendations because luxury shoppers expect to discover exclusive and rare items. Thus, recommender systems for fashion need to consider diversity and elevate the shopping experience by recommending new brands and products from the catalog. In this work, we explored a handful of diversification strategies to rerank the output of a relevance-focused recommender system. Subsequently, we conducted a multi-objective offline experiment optimizing for relevance and diversity simultaneously. We measured diversity with commonly used metrics such as coverage, serendipity, and neighborhood distance, whereas, for relevance, we selected ranking metrics such as recall. The best diversification strategy offline improved user engagement by 2% in click-through rate and presented an uplift of 46% in distinct brands recommended when AB tested against real users. These results reinforced the importance of considering accuracy and diversity metrics when developing a recommender system.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

SIGIR22-sp1855.mp4

mp4

11 MB

References

  1. Gediminas Adomavicius and Young Ok Kwon. 2012. Improving aggregate recommendation diversity using ranking-based techniques. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 24 (2012), 896--911.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rubi Boim, Tova Milo, and Slava Novgorodov. 2011. Diversification and Refinement in Collaborative Filtering Recommender (Full Version).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Keith Bradley and Barry Smyth. 2001. Improving Recommendation Diversity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mouzhi Ge, Carla Delgado-Battenfeld, and Dietmar Jannach. 2010. Beyond accuracy: Evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In RecSys'10 - Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 257--260. https://doi.org/10.1145/1864708.1864761Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Diogo Goncalves, Liwei Liu, João Sá, Tiago Otto, Ana Magalhães, and Paula Brochado. 2021. The Importance of Brand Affinity in Luxury Fashion Recommendations. In Recommender Systems in Fashion and Retail, Nima Dokoohaki, Shatha Jaradat, Humberto Jesús Corona Pampín, and Reza Shirvany (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jonathan L. Herlocker, Joseph A. Konstan, Loren G. Terveen, and John T. Riedl. 2004. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22 (January 2004), 5--53. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/963770.963772Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rong Hu and Pearl Pu. 2011. Helping Users Perceive Recommendation Diversity. http://paw-project.sourceforge.netGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Neil Hurley and Mi Zhang. 2011. Novelty and Diversity in top-N recommendation-Analysis and evaluation. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 10 (3 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang Li, Haoyun Feng, and Maarten De Rijke. 2020. Cascading Hybrid Bandits: Online Learning to Rank for Relevance and Diversity. In RecSys 2020 - 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 33--42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383313.3412245Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rishabh Mehrotra, Niannan Xue, and Mounia Lalmas. 2020. Bandit Based Optimization of Multiple Objectives on a Music Streaming Platform. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3224--3233. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403374Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Patrick Ngatchou, Anahita Zarei, and M A El-Sharkawi. 2005. Pareto Multi Objective Optimization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pedro Nogueira, Diogo Gonçalves, Vanessa Queiroz Marinho, Ana Rita Magalhães, and João Sá. 2022. A Critical Analysis of Offline Evaluation Decisions Against Online Results: A Real-Time Recommendations Case Study. In Recommender Systems in Fashion and Retail. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 73--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Javier Parapar and Filip Radlinski. 2021. Towards unified metrics for accuracy and diversity for recommender systems. In RecSys 2021 - 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 75--84. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460231.3474234Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, Bracha Shapira, and Paul B. Kantor. 2011. Recommender systems handbook. Springer, New York; London.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Guy Shani and Asela Gunawardana. 2011. Evaluating Recommendation Systems. Springer US, Boston, MA. 257--297 pages. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0--387--85820--3_8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Barry Smyth and Paul McClave. 2001. Similarity vs. Diversity. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Saúl Vargas, Sandoval Supervisor, and Pablo Castells Azpilicueta. 2012. Novelty and Diversity Enhancement and Evaluation in Recommender Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yuan Cao Zhang, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Daniele Quercia, and Tamas Jambor. 2012. Auralist: introducing serendipity into music recommendation. In WSDM '12. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Cai-Nicolas Ziegler, Sean M McNee, Gebäude Nr, Joseph A Konstan, and Georg Lausen. 2005. Improving Recommendation Lists Through Topic Diversification.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Diversity Vs Relevance: A Practical Multi-objective Study in Luxury Fashion Recommendations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '22: Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
      July 2022
      3569 pages
      ISBN:9781450387323
      DOI:10.1145/3477495

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 July 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader