skip to main content
10.1145/3477495.3532055acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Rethinking Correlation-based Item-Item Similarities for Recommender Systems

Published:07 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper studies correlation-based item-item similarity measures for recommendation systems. While current research on recommender systems is directed toward deep learning-based approaches, nearest neighbor methods have been still used extensively in commercial recommender systems due to their simplicity. A crucial step in item-based nearest neighbor methods is to compute similarities between items, which are generally estimated through correlation measures like Pearson. The purpose of this paper is to re-investigate the effectiveness of correlation-based nearest neighbor methods on several benchmark datasets that have been used for recommendation evaluation in recent years. This paper also provides a more effective estimation method for correlation measures than the classical Pearson correlation coefficient and shows that this leads to significant improvements in recommendation performance.

References

  1. Deepak Agarwal, Liang Zhang, and Rahul Mazumder. 2011. Modeling item-item similarities for personalized recommendations on Yahoo! front page. The Annals of applied statistics (2011), 1839--1875.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. James Bennett, Stan Lanning, et al. 2007. The Netflix Prize. In Proceedings of KDD cup and workshop, Vol. 2007. New York, NY, USA., 35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Thierry Bertin-Mahieux, Daniel P. W. Ellis, Brian Whitman, and Paul Lamere. 2011. The Million Song Dataset. In Proceedings of the 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2011, Miami, Florida, USA, October 24--28, 2011, Anssi Klapuri and Colby Leider (Eds.). 591--596.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mukund Deshpande and George Karypis. 2004. Item-based top-n recommendation algorithms. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 22, 1 (2004), 143--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. F Maxwell Harper and Joseph A Konstan. 2015. The Movielens Datasets: History and Context. ACM transactions on interactive intelligent systems (tiis) 5, 4 (2015), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. 173--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yifan Hu, Yehuda Koren, and Chris Volinsky. 2008. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In 2008 Eighth IEEE international conference on data mining. Ieee, 263--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Maurice George Kendall et al. 1946. The advanced theory of statistics. The advanced theory of statistics. 2nd Ed (1946).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Halime Khojamli and Jafar Razmara. 2021. Survey of similarity functions on neighborhood-based collaborative filtering. Expert Systems with Applications 185 (2021), 115482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Peter Knees, Dominik Schnitzer, and Arthur Flexer. 2014. Improving neighborhood-based collaborative filtering by reducing hubness. In Proceedings of International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. 161--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yehuda Koren. 2008. Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 426--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yehuda Koren, Robert Bell, and Chris Volinsky. 2009. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42, 8 (2009), 30--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dawen Liang, Rahul G Krishnan, Matthew D Hoffman, and Tony Jebara. 2018. Variational autoencoders for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference. 689--698.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Greg Linden, Brent Smith, and Jeremy York. 2003. Amazon. com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet computing 7, 1 (2003), 76--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sam Lobel, Chunyuan Li, Jianfeng Gao, and Lawrence Carin. 2019. RaCT: Toward Amortized Ranking-Critical Training For Collaborative Filtering. In International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Xin Luo, Mengchu Zhou, Yunni Xia, and Qingsheng Zhu. 2014. An efficient non-negative matrix-factorization-based approach to collaborative filtering for recommender systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 10, 2 (2014), 1273--1284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Hao Ma, Irwin King, and Michael R Lyu. 2007. Effective missing data prediction for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 39--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Xia Ning and George Karypis. 2011. Slim: Sparse linear methods for top-n recommender systems. In 2011 IEEE 11th international conference on data mining. IEEE, 497--506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Badrul Sarwar, George Karypis, Joseph Konstan, and John Riedl. 2001. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web. 285--295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Harald Steck. 2019. Embarrassingly shallow autoencoders for sparse data. In The World Wide Web Conference. 3251--3257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Marwan Torki. 2018. A document descriptor using covariance of word vectors. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers). 527--532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Koen Verstrepen and Bart Goethals. 2014. Unifying nearest neighbors collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems. 177--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Joe Whittaker. 1990. Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics. Wiley, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yao Wu, Christopher DuBois, Alice X Zheng, and Martin Ester. 2016. Collaborative denoising auto-encoders for top-n recommender systems. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM international conference on web search and data mining. 153--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yin Zheng, Bangsheng Tang, Wenkui Ding, and Hanning Zhou. 2016. A neural autoregressive approach to collaborative filtering. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 764--773.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Rethinking Correlation-based Item-Item Similarities for Recommender Systems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGIR '22: Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
          July 2022
          3569 pages
          ISBN:9781450387323
          DOI:10.1145/3477495

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 July 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)65
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader