skip to main content
10.1145/3477495.3536320acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

DDEN: A Heterogeneous Learning-to-Rank Approach with Deep Debiasing Experts Network

Published:07 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Learning-to-Rank(LTR) is widely used in many Information Retrieval(IR) scenarios, including web search and Location Based Services(LBS) search. However, most existing LTR techniques mainly focus on homogeneous ranking. Taking QAC in Dianping search as an example, heterogeneous documents including suggested queries (SQ) and Point-of-Interests(POI) need to be ranked and presented to enhance user experience. New challenges are faced when conducting heterogeneous ranking, including inconsistent feature space and more serious position bias caused by distinct representation spaces. Therefore, we propose Deep Debiasing Experts Network (DDEN), a novel heterogeneous LTR approach based on Mixture-of-Experts architecture and gating network, to deal with the inconsistent feature space of documents in ranking system. Furthermore, DDEN mitigates the position bias by adopting adversarial-debiasing framework embedded with heterogeneous LTR techniques. We conduct reproducible experiments on industrial datasets from Dianping, one of the largest local life platforms, and deploy DDEN in online application. Results show that DDEN substantially improves ranking performance in offline evaluation and boost the overall click-through rate in online A/B test by 2.1%.

References

  1. Aman Agarwal, Ivan Zaitsev, Xuanhui Wang, Cheng Li, Marc Najork, and Thorsten Joachims. 2019. Estimating position bias without intrusive interventions. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 474--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ziv Bar-Yossef and Naama Kraus. 2011. Context-sensitive query auto-completion. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web. 107--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Christopher JC Burges. 2010. From ranknet to lambdarank to lambdamart: An overview. Learning 11, 23--581 (2010), 81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai, Fei, de, Rijke, and Maarten. 2016. A Survey of Query Auto Completion in Information Retrieval. Now Publishers Inc.PUB4850Hanover, MA, USA. 3--q7 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rich Caruana. 1993. Multitask Learning: A Knowledge-Based Source of Inductive Bias. In Machine Learning, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA, June 27--29, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems. 191--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Antonino Freno. 2017. Practical lessons from developing a large-scale recommender system at Zalando. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 251--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Katja Hofmann, Bhaskar Mitra, Filip Radlinski, Shokouhi, and Milad. 2014. An Eye-tracking Study of User Interactions with Query Auto Completion. In Acm International Conference on Conference on Information Knowledge Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jyun-Yu Jiang and Pu-Jen Cheng. 2016. Classifying user search intents for query auto-completion. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval. 49--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sofia Ira Ktena, Alykhan Tejani, Lucas Theis, Pranay Kumar Myana, Deepak Dilipkumar, Ferenc Huszár, Steven Yoo, and Wenzhe Shi. 2019. Addressing delayed feedback for continuous training with neural networks in CTR prediction. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 187--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ho Chang Lee, Hae Chang Rim, and Do Gil Lee. 2019. Learning to rank products based on online product reviews using a hierarchical deep neural network. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 36 (2019), 100874.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Pengcheng Li, Runze Li, Qing Da, An-Xiang Zeng, and Lijun Zhang. 2020. Improving Multi-Scenario Learning to Rank in E-commerce by Exploiting Task Relationships in the Label Space. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2605--2612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. LiYing, HuangJizhou, LeiJinyi, FanMiao, WangHaifeng, and ChenEnhong. 2020. Personalized Query Auto-Completion for Large-Scale POI Search in Baidu Maps. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiaqi Ma, Zhe Zhao, Xinyang Yi, Jilin Chen, Lichan Hong, and Ed H Chi. 2018. Modeling task relationships in multi-task learning with multi-gate mixture-ofexperts. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1930--1939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ayan Sinha, David F Gleich, and Karthik Ramani. 2017. Deconvolving feedback loops in recommender systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.01049 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Aston Zhang, Amit Goyal, Weize Kong, Hongbo Deng, Anlei Dong, Yi Chang, Carl A Gunter, and Jiawei Han. 2015. adaqac: Adaptive query auto-completion via implicit negative feedback. In Proceedings of the 38th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. 143--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Zhe Zhao, Lichan Hong, Li Wei, Jilin Chen, Aniruddh Nath, Shawn Andrews, Aditee Kumthekar, Maheswaran Sathiamoorthy, Xinyang Yi, and Ed Chi. 2019. Recommending what video to watch next: a multitask ranking system. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 43--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. DDEN: A Heterogeneous Learning-to-Rank Approach with Deep Debiasing Experts Network

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '22: Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
      July 2022
      3569 pages
      ISBN:9781450387323
      DOI:10.1145/3477495

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 July 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader