skip to main content
10.1145/3478431.3499295acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What is a Computer Scientist?: Unpacking the Ontological Beliefs of Black and Hispanic Female Computing Students

Published:22 February 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic women in computer science is a long-standing problem that looks bleak at every level - undergraduate and graduate. This is prompting scholars to explore reasons for these low participation rates. One framework used to understand participation and persistence in STEM fields is identity. Prior work in computer science education suggest that identity is a strong indicator of persistence in these fields. However, it is hard to understand students' perception of identity without also understanding ontological beliefs with regards to a computer scientist. In this study, we explore the nature of a computer scientist. Guided by social identity theory, we designed a study that asked students to describe their definition or ontological belief of what constitutes a computer scientist in contrast to their ability to ascribe a computer science identity to self. Leveraging qualitative methods, we interviewedn = 24 women in computer science (Black and Hispanic, undergraduate and graduate students), in order to explore the role their ontological beliefs had on their computer science identity salience. The research questions guiding this work are: (1) How do Black and Hispanic women describe or define computer scientists? (2) What impact does this definition have on Black and Hispanic women's ability to claim a computing identity? Results suggest that the wide variation in definitions has a negative impact on computer science identity salience. The findings from this work suggest that computing should consider the impacts of the current messaging of what constitutes a computer scientist.

References

  1. Anita P. Chikkatur and Cheryl Jones-Walker. 2013. The influence of researcher identity on ethnographies in multiracial schools. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26, 7 (2013), 829--847.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. John W Creswell and Cheryl N Poth. 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbara J Daley. 2004. Using concept maps in qualitative research. (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jennifer Dempsey, Richard Snodgrass, Isabel Kishi, and Allison Titcomb. 2015. The emerging role of self-perception in student intentions. (2015), 108--113. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677305Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lorelle Espinosa. 2011. Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review 81, 2 (2011), 209--241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. George Foster, Simona Gandrabur, Philippe Langlais, Pierre Plamondon, Graham Russell, and Michel Simard. 2003. Statistical Machine Translation: Rapid Development with Limited Resources. In Proceedings of MT Summit IX. New Orleans, USA, 110--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Juan C. Garibay. 2015. STEM students' social agency and views on working for social change: Are STEM disciplines developing socially and civically responsible students? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52, 5 (2015), 610--632. https: //doi.org/10.1002/tea.21203Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Francisco J Gutierrez, Jocelyn Simmonds, Cecilia Casanova, Cecilia Sotomayor, and Nancy Hitschfeld. 2018. Coding or hacking? Exploring inaccurate views on computing and computer scientists among K-6 learners in Chile. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 993--998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Alexandria K Hansen, Hilary A Dwyer, Ashley Iveland, Mia Talesfore, Lacy Wright, Danielle B Harlow, and Diana Franklin. 2017. Assessing children's understanding of the work of computer scientists: The draw-a-computer-scientist test. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education. 279--284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Trudy Howles. 2009. A study of attrition and the use of student learning communities in the computer science introductory programming sequence. Computer science education 19, 1 (2009), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Paivi Kinnunen, Matthew Butler, Michael Morgan, Aletta Nylen, Anne-Kathrin Peters, Jane Sinclair, Sara Kalvala, and Erkki Pesonen. 2018. Understanding initial undergraduate expectations and identity in computing studies. European Journal of Engineering Education 43, 2 (2018), 201--218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797. 2016.1146233Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jonathan Mahadeo, Zahra Hazari, and Geoff Potvin. 2020. Developing a computing identity framework: Understanding computer science and information technology career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 1 (2020), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N Noy, Deborah L McGuinness, et al. 2001. Ontology development 101. Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University 2001 (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. 2018. Assessing and responding to the growth of computer science undergraduate enrollments. National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sarah L Rodriguez and Kathleen Lehman. 2017. Developing the next generation of diverse computer scientists: the need for enhanced, intersectional computing identity theory. Computer Science Education 27, 3--4 (2017), 229--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip Sadler. 2020. The intersection of being black and being a woman: Examining the effect of social computing relationships on computer science career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 2 (2020), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Johnny Saldaña and Matt Omasta. 2016. Qualitative research: Analyzing life. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruth HV Sealy and Val Singh. 2010. The importance of role models and demographic context for senior women's work identity development. International Journal of Management Reviews 12, 3 (2010), 284--300.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Irving Seidman. 2006. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sheldon Stryker and Peter J Burke. 2000. The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social psychology quarterly (2000), 284--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mohsen Taheri, Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Mark Weiss, Michael Georgiopoulos, Ken Christensen, Tiana Solis, Atalie Garcia, and Deepa Chari. 2018. A structural equation model analysis of computing identity sub-constructs and student academic persistence. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education. 2018. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). https://nces.ed.gov/ ipeds/use-the-dataGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sepehr Vakil. 2020. "I've always been scared that someday I'm going to sell out": Exploring the relationship between political identity and learning in computer science education. Cognition and Instruction 38, 2 (2020), 87--115. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/07370008.2020.1730374Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Joachim Walther, Nicola W Sochacka, and Nadia N Kellam. 2013. Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study. Journal of Engineering Education 102, 4 (2013), 626--659.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Billy Wong. 2016. 'I'm good, but not that good': digitally-skilled young people's identity in computing. Computer Science Education 26, 4 (2016), 299--317. https: //doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1292604Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. What is a Computer Scientist?: Unpacking the Ontological Beliefs of Black and Hispanic Female Computing Students

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - Volume 1
      February 2022
      1049 pages
      ISBN:9781450390705
      DOI:10.1145/3478431

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 February 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024
      SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
      November 30 - December 1, 2024
      Virtual Event , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader