skip to main content
10.1145/3478431.3499328acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Experience Report on the Use of Breakout Rooms in a Large Online Course

Published: 22 February 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we present our experience with the use of breakout rooms in a second year undergraduate Software Design course at a large North American institution. Following the switch to remote instruction during the coronavirus pandemic, we revamped our in-person Software Design course to be delivered as a flipped online course, making extensive use of in-lecture exercises completed during breakout rooms. We report on the structure and logistics of this lecture design (for a large class of 300+ students). To gain insights into the impact of the use of breakout rooms on student experience, we conducted weekly student surveys asking for feedback on the lectures and specifically on the use of breakout rooms. Although many students had positive feelings regarding the use of breakout rooms, a significant percentage of students (an average of 47% of the survey responses each week) expressed negative feelings toward them. In an end-of-term survey, we specifically asked students about what they felt worked best for breakout rooms in terms of group size and pre-assigned versus randomized groups, and if there were any other areas that they felt needed improvement. Some of the patterns we observed were that most students liked smaller groups (2-5 people), preferred staying in the same group throughout the semester, and enjoyed the use of breakout rooms as long as others in their room were active participants. We share the details of these survey results as well as the tips and lessons that we learned through this experience.

References

[1]
Anthonia Bamidele. 2021. Student-Centered Interactions within an ESL Classroom using Online Breakout Room. Available at SSRN 3878774 (2021).
[2]
Jacob Lowell Bishop and Matthew A. Verleger. 2013. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In Proceedings of the annual conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Vol. 30. Article 9, bibinfonumpages18 pages.
[3]
Bethany Blackstone and Elizabeth A Oldmixon. 2016. Assessing the effect of breakout sessions on student success and satisfaction. PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 49, 1 (2016), 117--121.
[4]
EK Bucholz. 2021. Creating a Welcoming and Engaging Environment in an Entirely Online Biomedical Engineering Course. Biomedical Engineering Education, Vol. 1, 1 (2021), 165--169.
[5]
Kathy Chandler. 2016. Using breakout rooms in synchronous online tutorials. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, Vol. 4, 3 (2016), 16--23.
[6]
Randall S. Davies, Douglas L. Dean, and Nick Ball. 2013. Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 61, 4 (2013), 563--580.
[7]
Jacob Enfield. 2013. Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, Vol. 57, 6 (2013), 14--27.
[8]
Cynthia Foronda and Christine Lippincott. 2014. Graduate nursing students' experience with synchronous, interactive videoconferencing within online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, Vol. 15, 2 (2014), 1.
[9]
Gerald C. Gannod, Janet E. Burge, and Michael T. Helmick. 2008. Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. In Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering . 226--236.
[10]
Michail Giannakos, John Krogstie, and Nikos Chrisochoides. 2014. Reviewing the flipped classroom research: reflections for computer science education. In Proceedings of the computer science education research conference. 23--29.
[11]
Hsiu-Ting Hung. 2015. Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, Vol. 28, 1 (2015), 81--96.
[12]
Deanna Kuhn. 2015. Thinking together and alone. Educational researcher, Vol. 44, 1 (2015), 46--53.
[13]
Maureen J. Lage, Glenn J. Platt, and Michael Treglia. 2000. Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 31, 1 (2000), 30--43.
[14]
Andrea Rakushin Lee. 2021. Breaking through Digital Barriers: Exploring EFL Students' V iews of Zoom Breakout Room Experiences. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, Vol. 21 (2021), 510--524.
[15]
Ling Li, Li Xu, Yuming He, Wu He, Silvana Watson, Shana Pribesh, and Debbie Major. 2021. Using pair programming as a collaborative learning approach to support students with learning disabilities via Zoom breakout rooms. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 1276--1281.
[16]
Kate Lockwood and Rachel Esselstein. 2013. The inverted classroom and the CS curriculum. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 113--118.
[17]
Justan Lougheed, James Kirkland, and Genevieve Newton. 2012. Using breakout groups as an active learning technique in a large undergraduate nutrition classroom at the University of Guelph. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 3, 2 (2012).
[18]
Mary Lou Maher, Celine Latulipe, Heather Lipford, and Audrey Rorrer. 2015. Flipped classroom strategies for CS education. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 218--223.
[19]
Susi Peacock, Sue Murray, Douglas Brown, Simon Girdler, Bianca Mastrominico, John Dean, et almbox. 2012. Exploring tutor and student experiences in online synchronous learning environments in the performing arts. Creative Education, Vol. 3, 07 (2012), 1269.
[20]
Daniel L Reinholz, Amelia Stone-Johnstone, Isabel White, Lorenzo M Sianez Jr, and Niral Shah. 2020. A pandemic crash course: Learning to teach equitably in synchronous online classes. CBE-Life Sciences Education, Vol. 19, 4 (2020), ar60.
[21]
Jeffrey Saltz and Robert Heckman. 2020. Using Structured Pair Activities in a Distributed Online Breakout Room. Online Learning, Vol. 24, 1 (2020), 227--244.
[22]
Jeremy Strayer. 2012. How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning environments research, Vol. 15, 2 (2012), 171--193.
[23]
Guillermo Tonsmann. 2014. A Study of the Effectiveness of Blackboard Collaborate for Conducting Synchronous Courses at Multiple Locations. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, Vol. 9 (2014), 54--63.
[24]
B Jill Venton and Rebecca R Pompano. 2021. Strategies for enhancing remote student engagement through active learning.
[25]
Stephanie Gray Wilson. 2013. The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 40, 3 (2013), 193--199.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Effectiveness of Breakout Rooms in Blended LearningEmbracing Cutting-Edge Technology in Modern Educational Settings10.4018/979-8-3693-1022-9.ch004(69-92)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
  • (2024)What Is it Like for a Learner to Participate in a Zoom Breakout Room Session?Phenomenology in Action for Researching Networked Learning10.1007/978-3-031-62780-4_7(125-152)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Achieving online dialogic learning using breakout roomsResearch in Learning Technology10.25304/rlt.v31.288231Online publication date: 24-Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Experience Report on the Use of Breakout Rooms in a Large Online Course

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - Volume 1
      February 2022
      1049 pages
      ISBN:9781450390705
      DOI:10.1145/3478431
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 22 February 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. breakout rooms
      2. collaborative learning
      3. online learning
      4. qualitative analysis

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      SIGCSE 2022
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,787 of 5,146 submissions, 35%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)The Effectiveness of Breakout Rooms in Blended LearningEmbracing Cutting-Edge Technology in Modern Educational Settings10.4018/979-8-3693-1022-9.ch004(69-92)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
      • (2024)What Is it Like for a Learner to Participate in a Zoom Breakout Room Session?Phenomenology in Action for Researching Networked Learning10.1007/978-3-031-62780-4_7(125-152)Online publication date: 15-Aug-2024
      • (2023)Achieving online dialogic learning using breakout roomsResearch in Learning Technology10.25304/rlt.v31.288231Online publication date: 24-Feb-2023
      • (2023)‘How was it for you?’ The impacts of student-staff partnerships in developing online teaching and learningJournal of Further and Higher Education10.1080/0309877X.2023.224139347:9(1276-1287)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2023
      • (2023)From crisis to opportunity: practices and technologies for a more effective post-COVID classroomEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11929-929:5(5981-6003)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2023
      • (2022)“It Enables Us to Reflect More on Nutrition”: A Mixed Methods Cross-Sectional Study on Preclinical Digital Training in Nurse EducationEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1301003213:1(32)Online publication date: 28-Dec-2022
      • (2022)Breakout Rooms Serve as a Suitable Tool for Interprofessional Pre-Service Online Training among Students within Health, Social, and Education Study ProgramsEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1212087112:12(871)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2022

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media