skip to main content
10.1145/3478432.3499225acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
panel

The Case for Acknowledging Subjectivity in CS Education Research Data

Published: 03 March 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Is quantitative data collected by CS education researchers objective? If we combine data from a set of studies that measure the same type of intervention, will that really show us the strength of that intervention? Are qualitative studies really less rigorous than quantitative because the number of participants may be as low as one?
In this panel, we will first present the different types of studies that are most common in CS education research and provide a working definition for what we mean by various types of research methodologies (e.g., quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods). Drawing upon our experiences in the field of studying computing education, we will then explore some of the myths surrounding data, highlighting where evidence presented through research data is rigorous and, when not, how we (as researchers) can mitigate the risks of collecting and sharing data that is unsound in publications.
We encourage you to attend. After all, this panel has been recommended by four out of five computer science education researchers.

References

[1]
Sanne F Akkerman, Arthur Bakker, and William R Penuel. 2021. Relevance of Educational Research: An Ontological Conceptualization. Educational Researcher (2021), 0013189X211028239.
[2]
Darrell Huff. 1954. How to Lie with Statistics .W.W. Norton & Company.
[3]
Monica M McGill, Tom McKlin, and Errol Kaylor. 2019. Defining what empirically works best: Dynamic generation of meta-analysis for computer science education. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on ICER . 199--207.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Ungrading as a Pedagogy for Teaching Qualitative Research Methods in ComputingProceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3641554.3701814(631-637)Online publication date: 12-Feb-2025

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2
March 2022
254 pages
ISBN:9781450390712
DOI:10.1145/3478432
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 March 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. data
  2. education
  3. mixed methods
  4. objectivity
  5. qualitative
  6. quantitative
  7. subjectivity

Qualifiers

  • Panel

Conference

SIGCSE 2022
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,787 of 5,146 submissions, 35%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Ungrading as a Pedagogy for Teaching Qualitative Research Methods in ComputingProceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3641554.3701814(631-637)Online publication date: 12-Feb-2025

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media