Tingting Cai
ABSTRACT
Studies have suggested the possible advantages of Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs) over Multi-Touch Interfaces (MTIs) in preschool education, but more objective evidence is lacking. In this study, we designed an math game called “THE NUMBERS” for preschool children, using eye-tracking to assess cognitive differences between the TUI version and the MTI version to compare their potential to enhance learning. Results showed that when using the TUI version participants made more attempts, which was a significant predictor of learning outcomes; the TUI version had a lower cognitive load; participants' attention was more focused on areas containing critical content using the TUI version; and the TUI version had higher satisfaction than the MTI version because it was more accessible. These findings provided theoretical supports for the use of TUIs in preschool education.
- Froebel, F., Pedagogics of the Kindergarten. 1899.Google Scholar
- Ishii, H. and B. Ullmer. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. in Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems. 1997. ACM.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu, J. and R. Roque, A review of computational toys and kits for young children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2019. 21: p. 17-36.Google Scholar
- Jochen, , Learning by Doing with Shareable Interfaces.Google Scholar
- Xu, D., Tangible User Interface for Children-An Overview. 2020.Google Scholar
- Papert, S.A., Mindstorms: Children, Computers, And Powerful Ideas. 1993: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Xu, D., E. Mazzone, and S. MacFarlane, In search for evaluation methods for children's tangible technology. 2006: p. 171-172.Google Scholar
- Schneider, B., , Using mobile eye-trackers to unpack the perceptual benefits of a tangible user interface for collaborative learning. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 2016. 23(6): p. 39.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schneider, B., , Benefits of a Tangible Interface for Collaborative Learning and Interaction. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 4(3): p. 222-232.Google Scholar
- Shaer, O. and E. Hornecker, Tangible User Interfaces: Past, present, and future directions. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 2009. 3(1-2): p. 1-137.Google Scholar
- Antle, A.N. and A.F. Wise, Getting down to details: Using theories of cognition and learning to inform tangible user interface design. Interacting with Computers, 2013. 25(1): p. 1-20.Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, O. and A. Gal-Oz, To TUI or not to TUI: Evaluating performance and preference in tangible vs. graphical user interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2013. 71(7): p. 803-820.Google Scholar
- Tuddenham, P., D.S. Kirk, and S. Izadi. Graspables Revisited: Multi-Touch vs. Tangible Input for Tabletop Displays in Acquisition and Manipulation Tasks. in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2010, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, April 10-15, 2010. 2010.Google Scholar
- Waldner, M., Tangible Tiles: Design and Evaluation of a Tangible User Interface in a Collaborative Tabletop Setup. 2006.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Garcia-Sanjuan, F., , Evaluating a tactile and a tangible multi-tablet gamified quiz system for collaborative learning in primary education. Computers & Education, 2018. 123: p. 65-84.Google Scholar
- Papavlasopoulou, S., K. Sharma, and M.N. Giannakos, Coding activities for children: Coupling eye-tracking with qualitative data to investigate gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019: p. 105939.Google Scholar
- Nadia, N., , A Two-Minute Paper-and-Pencil Test of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Numerical Magnitude Processing Explains Variability in Primary School Children's Arithmetic Competence. Plos One, 2013. 8(7): p. e67918.Google Scholar
- Swaney-Stueve, M., T. Jepsen, and G. Deubler, The emoji scale: A facial scale for the 21st century. Food Quality and Preference, 2018. 68: p. 183-190.Google Scholar
- Just, M.A. and P.A. Carpenter, The role of eye-fixation research in cognitive psychology. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1976. 8(2): p. 139-143.Google Scholar
- Lucignano, L., , My hands or my mouse: Comparing a tangible and graphical user interface using eye-tracking data.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Tangible vs. Multi-Touch: Comparing Potential to Enhance Learning for Preschool Children Using Eye-tracking
Recommendations
Comparing Tangible and Multi-touch Interaction for Interactive Data Visualization Tasks
TEI '16: Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied InteractionInteractive visualization plays a key role in the analysis of large datasets. It can help users to explore data, investigate hypotheses and find patterns. The easier and more tangible the interaction, the more likely it is to enhance understanding. This ...
Preschool children's use of mouse buttons
CHI EA '04: CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe have observed numerous times how young children find it difficult to use software that provides different functionality with each mouse button. To better learn how young children use mice, we conducted a study with 4 year-olds, 5 year-olds, and ...
Embodied metaphors in tangible interaction design
For centuries, learning and development has been supported by physical activity and manipulating physical objects. With the introduction of embedded technologies, opportunities for employing tangible or embodied interaction for learning and development ...
Comments