skip to main content
10.1145/3479239.3485684acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reliable Consistent Multipath mmWave Communication

Published:22 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Reliable consistent communication over millimeter-wave (mmWave) channels is a challenging problem due to their sensitivity to blocking of Line of Sight connections. MmWave is a key building block in 5G and future generation cellular networks, making solutions to this problem space important. Our aim is to use predictive control to manage and simultaneously use multiple available mmWave paths to achieve reliable consistent communication (i.e., steady transmission rate with low delay) with a multipath proxy. To this end we investigate transient solutions of Markov Modulated Fluid Queue models (MMFQ), apt because the mmWave blocking has been modeled with Markovian models. We propose a combination of models that can be solved using newly proposed matrix analytic techniques in a timely enough manner for use in real-time control. This gives us a prediction of either proxy queue distributions or probabilities of reaching proxy buffer levels over a short time horizon, enabling the proxy to make preemptive path decisions to maintain a desired Quality of Service. A proof of concept simulation study demonstrates the efficacy of our proposed MMFQ-based predictive approach over either static or purely reactive control approaches.

References

  1. 3GPP 2020. 23.501:System Architecture for the 5G System. 3GPP. v16.4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Ahn and V. Ramaswami. 2004. Transient Analysis of Fluid Flow Models via Stochastic Coupling to a Queue. Stochastic Models 20, 1 (2004), 71--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. N. Akar, O. Gursoy, G. Horvath, and M. Telek. 2020. Transient and First Passage Time Distributions for First and Second-order Multi-regime Markov Fluid Queues via ME-fication. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. N. Akar and K. Sohraby. 2004. Infinite- and finite-buffer Markov fluid queues: A unified analysis. Journal of Applied Probability 41 (2004), 557--569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Q. An, Y. Liu, Y. Ma, and Z. Li. 2020. Multipath Extension for QUIC. Internet-Draft draft-an-multipath-quic-00. IETF.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Apple. 2020. Improving Network Reliability Using Multipath TCP. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/urlsessionconfiguration/improving_network_reliability_using_multipath_tcpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Q. De Coninck and O. Bonaventure. 2020. Multipath Extensions for QUIC (MP-QUIC). Internet-Draft draft-deconinck-quic-multipath-06. IETF.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Q. De Coninck, M. Baerts, B. Hesmans, and O. Bonaventure. 2016. A First Analysis of Multipath TCP on Smartphones. In Passive and Active Measurement. 57--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Q. De Coninck, M. Baerts, B. Hesmans, and O. Bonaventure. 2016. Observing real smartphone applications over multipath TCP. IEEE Communications Magazine 54, 3 (2016), 88--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Deutschmann, K.-S. Hielscher, and R. German. 2020. Multipath Communication with Satellite and Terrestrial Links. Internet-Draft draft-deutschmann-sat-ter-multipath-00. IETF.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. ETSI 2020. 5G; Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz. ETSI. v16.1.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Ferlin, T. Dreibholz, and Ö. Alay. 2014. Multi-path transport over heterogeneous wireless networks: Does it really pay off . In IEEE GLOBECOM. 4807--4813.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. A. Hayes, D. Ros, and Ö. Alay. 2019. On the importance of TCP splitting proxies for future 5G mmWave communications. In IEEE LCN Symposium on Emerging Topics in Networking. 108--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. G. Horváth, I. Horváth, and M. Telek. 2020. High order concentrated matrix-exponential distributions. Stochastic Models 36, 2 (2020), 176--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. Hwang and J. Yoo. 2015. Packet scheduling for multipath TCP. In 7th Int'l Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN). IEEE, 177--179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. N. Keukeleire, B. Hesmans, and O. Bonaventure. 2020. Increasing Broadband Reach with Hybrid Access Networks. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine 4, 1 (2020), 43--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. Kim, S.-W. Ko, H. Kim, S. Kim, and S.-L.Kim. 2018. Exploiting Caching for Millimeter-Wave TCP Networks: Gain Analysis and Practical Design. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 69769--69781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. Kim, S.-W. Ko, and S.-L. Kim. 2017. Enhancing TCP End-to-End Performance in Millimeter-Wave Communications. arXiv:1709.00717 [cs.NI]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. V. Kulkarni and B. Garbinato. 2019. 20 Years of Mobility Modeling & Prediction: Trends, Shortcomings & Perspectives. In Proc. of ACM SIGSPATIAL. 492--495. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. V. G. Kulkarni. 1998. Frontiers in Queueing: Models and Applications in Science and Engineering. CRC Press, Inc., USA, Chapter Fluid Models for Single Buffer Systems, 321--338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Y.-S. Lim, Y.-C. Chen, E.M Nahum, D. Towsley, and K.-W. Lee. 2014. Cross-layer path management in multi-path transport protocol for mobile devices. In INFOCOM. 1815--1823.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Y. Liu, Y. Ma, C. Huitema, Q. An, and Z. Li. 2021. Multipath Extension for QUIC. Internet-Draft draft-liu-multipath-quic-03. IETF.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. G. R. MacCartney, T. S. Rappaport, and S. Rangan. 2017. Rapid Fading Due to Human Blockage in Pedestrian Crowds at 5G Millimeter-Wave Frequencies. In Proc. of IEEE GLOBECOM. 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. S. Mohebi, F. Michelinakis, A. Elmokashfi, O. Grøndalen, K. Mahmood, and A. Zanella. 2021. Sectors, Beams and Environmental Impact on Commercial 5G mmWave Cell Coverage: an Empirical Study. arXiv:2104.06188 [cs.NI] (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. A. Narayanan et al. 2020. A First Look at Commercial 5G Performance on Smartphones. In Proc. of The Web Conference. 894--905. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Nikravesh, Y. Guo, F. Qian, Z.M. Mao, and S. Sen. 2016. An in-depth understanding of multipath TCP on mobile devices: Measurement and system design. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom. ACM, 189--201. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. C. Paasch, G. Detal, F. Duchene, C. Raiciu, and O. Bonaventure. 2012. Exploring mobile/WiFi handover with multipath TCP. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Cellular networks. 31--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. M. Polese, R. Jana, and M. Zorzi. 2017. TCP in 5G mmWave Networks: Link Level Retransmissions and MP-TCP. In IEEE INFOCOM Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. M. Polese, M. Mezzavilla, M. Zhang, J. Zhu, S. Rangan, S. Panwar, and M. Zorzi. 2017. milliProxy: A TCP proxy architecture for 5G mmWave cellular systems. 51st Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers (Oct 2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. V. Ramaswami, D.G. Woolford, and D.A. Stanford. 2008. The erlangization method for Markovian fluid flows. Annals of Operations Research 160 (2008), 215--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Y. Ren, W. Yang, X. Zhou, H. Chen, and B. Liu. 2021. A survey on TCP over mmWave. Computer Communications 171 (2021), 80--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. B. Sericola. 1998. Transient analysis of stochastic fluid models. Performance Evaluation 32, 4 (1998), 245--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. H. Sinky, B. Hamdaoui, and M. Guizani. 2016. Proactive multipath TCP for seamless handoff in heterogeneous wireless access networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 15, 7 (2016), 4754--4764.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. H. Wu, G. Caso, S. Ferlin, Ö. Alay, and A. Brunstrom. 2021. Multipath Scheduling for 5G Networks: Evaluation and Outlook. IEEE Communications Magazine 59, 4 (2021), 44--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. R.W. Yeung, S.-Y. R. Li, N. Cai, and Z. Zhang. 2006. Network Coding Theory. Vol. 2. Now Publishers Inc., 241--381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. R. Zullo, A. Pescapè, K. Edeline, and B. Donnet. 2019. Hic Sunt Proxies: Un- veiling Proxy Phenomena in Mobile Networks. In Proc. of the Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Reliable Consistent Multipath mmWave Communication

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MSWiM '21: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems
          November 2021
          251 pages
          ISBN:9781450390774
          DOI:10.1145/3479239

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 November 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader