Kayla DesPortes
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
In our society, where technologies continue to act as a marginalizing force for various individuals and communities, makerspaces present unique opportunities for community-driven work that engages people with a variety of communal technologies, knowledge, and work practices. However, makerspaces grew out of largely exclusionary discourses, which continue to neglect non-dominant technology practices, knowledge bases, and communities. Despite these origins, research remains largely optimistic about the potential for makerspaces to provide equitable opportunities for those stereotypically excluded to engage, learn, and build with technologies. We mirror this optimism through our work examining how makerspaces might be positioned to address social inequities while supporting community growth and development. This paper traces the development of a social justice makerspace situated within a community of color in the United States. The work contributes a contextual analysis of the design of a makerspace explicitly positioned to forefront community voices and address issues of social inequities. We highlight community perspectives within our situated design process as we draw out the themes and tensions that arose. Applying a social justice framework from Dombrowski et al. (2016) and Lötter's (2011) to our findings we demonstrate how makerspaces can be positioned to address social inequities through: identifying, educating, and communicating about inequities; engaging in the distribution of resources and opportunities; and enabling capacity building at the individual and structural levels. We highlight how an asset-based orientation can position the makerspace to grow in effective ways to address community issues.
- Ames, M.G. 2018. Hackers, Computers, and Cooperation: A Critical History of Logo and Constructionist Learning. 2, (2018), 18.Google Scholar
- Ames, M.G. et al. 2018. Making or making do? Challenging the mythologies of making and hacking. (2018), 21.Google Scholar
- Bang, M. and Vossoughi, S. 2016. Participatory Design Research and Educational Justice: Studying Learning and Relations Within Social Change Making. Cognition and Instruction. 34, 3 (Jul. 2016), 173--193. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1181879.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bardzell, S. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2010), 1301--1310.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barron, B. et al. 2009. Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media. 1, 2 (2009), 55--77.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bergold, J. and Thomas, S. 2012. Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. (2012), 191--222.Google Scholar
- Bevan, B. 2017. The promise and the promises of Making in science education. Studies in Science Education. 53, 1 (Jan. 2017), 75--103. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1275380.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Blikstein, P. 2013. Digital fabrication and ?making'in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors. (2013), 1--21.Google Scholar
- Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2012. Thematic analysis. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. H. Cooper et al., eds. American Psychological Association. 57--71.Google Scholar
- Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77--101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Buechley, L. 2013. Closing Address.Google Scholar
- Calabrese Barton, A. et al. 2016. Mobilities of Criticality: Space-Making, Identity and Agency in a Youth-Centered Makerspace. (2016), 8.Google Scholar
- Calabrese Barton, A. and Tan, E. 2018. A Longitudinal Study of Equity-Oriented STEM-Rich Making Among Youth From Historically Marginalized Communities. American Educational Research Journal. 55, 4 (Aug. 2018), 761--800. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218758668.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Corbett, E. and Loukissas, Y. 2019. Engaging Gentrification as a Social Justice Issue in HCI. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow Scotland Uk, May 2019), 1--16.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cornwall, A. and Jewkes, R. 1995. What is Participatory Research? Social Science & Medicine. 41, 12 (1995), 1667--1676.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Corsini, L. and Moultrie, J. 2020. Humanitarian makerspaces in crisis-affected communities. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing. (2020), 1--13.Google Scholar
- Corsini, L. and Moultrie, J. 2018. The Role Of Makerspaces For Crisis-Affected Communities: Benefits And Challenges. (Aug. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1344465.Google ScholarCross Ref
- De Vries, H. et al. 2008. Using Pooled Kappa to Summarize Interrater Agreement across Many Items. Field Methods. 20, 3 (Mar. 2008), 272--282. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08317166.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DiSalvo, B. et al. 2016. Information Seeking Practices of Parents: Exploring Skills, Face Threats and Social Networks. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose California USA, May 2016), 623--634.Google Scholar
- DiSalvo, B. and DiSalvo, C. 2014. Designing for Democracy in Education: Participatory Design and the Learning Sciences. (2014), 7.Google Scholar
- DiSalvo, C. et al. 2008. The neighborhood networks project: A case study of critical engagement and creative expression through participatory design. (Oct. 2008), 41--50.Google Scholar
- Dittert, N. and Katterfeldt, E.-S. 2018. Diversity in Digital Fabrication: Programming Personally Meaningful Textile Imprints. Proceedings of the Conference on Creativity and Making in Education (Trondheim Norway, Jun. 2018), 112--113.Google Scholar
- Dombrowski, L. et al. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Brisbane QLD Australia, Jun. 2016), 656--671.Google Scholar
- Echanove, M. 2003. Bed-Stuy on the Move: Demographic trends and Economic Development in the heart of Brooklyn. Columbia University, GSAPP, Urban Planning.Google Scholar
- Eglash, R. 2004. Appropriating technology: Vernacular science and social power. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Erete, S. et al. 2021. I Can't Breathe: Reflections from Black Women in CSCW and HCI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 4, CSCW3 (Jan. 2021), 1--23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3432933.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Forssell, K.S. et al. 2008. Roles of parents in fostering technological fluency. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences-Volume 3 (2008), 33--34.Google Scholar
- Fox, S. et al. 2015. Hacking Culture, Not Devices: Access and Recognition in Feminist Hackerspaces. Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. (2015), 56--68.Google Scholar
- Gonzales, A. 2017. Technology Maintenance: A New Frame for Studying Poverty and Marginalization. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver Colorado USA, May 2017), 289--294.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grimme, S. et al. 2014. ?We've conquered dark": shedding light on empowerment in critical making. Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Fun, Fast, Foundational - NordiCHI '14 (Helsinki, Finland, 2014), 431--440.Google Scholar
- Halverson, E.R. and Sheridan, K. 2014. The Maker Movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review. 84, 4 (Dec. 2014), 495--504. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harrington, C.N. et al. 2019. Deconstructing Community-Based Collaborative Design: Towards More Equitable Participatory Design Engagements. PACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 3, (2019), 1--25.Google Scholar
- Hayes, G.R. 2014. Knowing by doing: action research as an approach to HCI. Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer. 49--68.Google Scholar
- Holbert, N. 2016. Bots for Tots: Building Inclusive Makerspaces by Leveraging ?Ways of Knowing." Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC '16 (Manchester, United Kingdom, 2016), 79--88.Google Scholar
- Hui, J.S. and Gerber, E.M. 2017. Developing Makerspaces as Sites of Entrepreneurship. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17 (Portland, Oregon, USA, 2017), 2023--2038.Google Scholar
- Irani, L. et al. 2010. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. (2010), 10.Google Scholar
- Kafai, Y.B. et al. 2014. A Crafts-Oriented Approach to Computing in High School: Introducing Computational Concepts, Practices, and Perspectives with Electronic Textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 14, 1 (Mar. 2014), 1--20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2576874.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khanipour, P.R. et al. 2017. Framing Makerspace Communities. 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Making in Education, FabLearn 2017 (2017).Google Scholar
- Khanipour Roshan, P. et al. 2015. Collaborative Learning in Online and Offline Makerspaces. (Gothenberg, Jun. 2015).Google Scholar
- Kretzmann, J. and McKnight, J. 1993. Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets. ACTA Publications.Google Scholar
- Kretzmann, J.L. and McKnight, J.P. 1996. Asset-Based Community Development. National Civic Review. 85, 4 (1996), 23--29.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lachney, M. et al. 2016. Software Design in the ?Construction Genre' of Learning Technology: Content Aware Versus Content Agonistic. Computational Culture: A Journal of Software Studies. 5, (2016), 1--15.Google Scholar
- Lindtner, S. et al. 2016. Reconstituting the Utopian Vision of Making: HCI After Technosolutionism. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16 (Santa Clara, California, USA, 2016), 1390--1402.Google Scholar
- Litts, B.K. 2015. Resources, facilitation, and partnerships: three design considerations for youth makerspaces. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC '15 (Boston, Massachusetts, 2015), 347--350.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lötter, H.P.P. [Hennie] 2011. Poverty Ethics and Justice. University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
- Martin, L. 2015. The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER). 5, 1 (Apr. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.7771/2157--9288.1099.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mathie, A. and Cunningham, G. 2003. From clients to citizens: Asset-based Community Development as a strategy for community-driven development. Development in Practice. 13, 5 (Nov. 2003), 474--486. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452032000125857.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McKnight, J.L. and Kretzmann, J.P. 1990. Mapping Community Capacity. Chicago Community Trust.Google Scholar
- Meehan, R.J. et al. 2014. A Card-Sorting Task to Establish Community Values in Designing Makerspaces. FabLearn. (2014), 4.Google Scholar
- Meissner, J.L. et al. 2017. Do-It-Yourself Empowerment as Experienced by Novice Makers with Disabilities. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Edinburgh United Kingdom, Jun. 2017), 1053--1065.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miller, J. and Garran, A.M. 2007. The Web of Institutional Racism. Smith College Studies in Social Work. 77, 1 (Mar. 2007), 33--67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1300/J497v77n01_03.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nel, H. 2018. A Comparison between the Asset-oriented and Needs-based Community Development Approaches in Terms of Systems Changes. Practice. 30, 1 (Jan. 2018), 33--52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2017.1360474.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Noble, S.U. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.Google Scholar
- Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, I.F. et al. 2020. Critical Race Theory for HCI. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu HI USA, Apr. 2020), 1--16.Google Scholar
- O'Leary, J.T. et al. 2019. Who Gets to Future? Race, Representation, and Design Methods in Africatown. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019).Google ScholarDigital Library
- O'Neil, C. 2017. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway Books.Google Scholar
- Oudshoorn, N. et al. 2004. Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 29, 1 (Jan. 2004), 30--63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903259190.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peppler, K. et al. 2017. Survey of Assessment in Makerspaces. Open Portfolio Project. (2017), 29.Google Scholar
- Pinkett, R. and Street, A. 2000. Bridging the Digital Divide: Sociocultural Constructionism and an Asset-Based Approach to Community Technology and Community Building. 81st Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (New Orleans, LA, 2000), 1--14.Google Scholar
- Ponzoni, E. 2016. Windows of understanding: broadening access to knowledge production through participatory action research. Qualitative Research. 16, 5 (2016), 557--574.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard, G.T. and Giri, S. 2017. Inclusive Collaborative Learning With Multi-Interface Design: Implications for Diverse and Equitable Makerspace Education. (Philadelphia, PA, 2017), 415--422.Google Scholar
- Roedl, D. et al. 2015. Sustainable Making? Balancing Optimism and Criticism in HCI Discourse. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 22, 3 (Jun. 2015), 1--27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2699742.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roque, R. et al. 2016. ?I'm Not Just a Mom": Parents Developing Multiple Roles in Creative Computing. International Conference of the Learning Sciences. (2016), 663--670.Google Scholar
- Sheridan, K. et al. 2014. Learning in the Making: A Comparative Case Study of Three Makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review. 84, 4 (Dec. 2014), 505--531. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.brr34733723j648u.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simpkins, S.D. et al. 2005. Parents' socializing behavior and children's participation in math, science, and computer out-of-school activities. Applied Developmental Science. 9, 1 (2005), 14--30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sivek, S.C. 2011. "We Need a Showing of All Hands": Technological Utopianism in MAKE Magazine. Journal of Communication Inquiry. (2011), 0196859911410317.Google Scholar
- Stickel, O. et al. 2015. 3D Printing with Marginalized Children-An Exploration in a Palestinian Refugee Camp. ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19--23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. N. Boulus-Rødje et al., eds. Springer International Publishing. 83--102.Google Scholar
- Stringer, S.M. 2018. NYC Neighborhood Economic Profiles.Google Scholar
- Tan, E. and Calabrese Barton, A. 2017. Designing for rightful presence in STEM-rich making: Community ethnography as pedagogy. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education - FabLearn '17 (Stanford, CA, USA, 2017), 1--8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tanenbaum, J. et al. 2010. The Reading Glove: designing interactions for object-based tangible storytelling. (2010), 1--9.Google Scholar
- Taylor, J.L. et al. 2017. Diversity and coherence in a hackerspace for people from a low socioeconomic community. Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction - OZCHI '17 (Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 2017), 238--247.Google Scholar
- Taylor, N. et al. 2016. Making Community: The Wider Role of Makerspaces in Public Life. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 1415--1425.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vakil, S. 2018. Ethics, Identity, and Political Vision: Toward a Justice-Centered Approach to Equity in Computer Science Education. Harvard Educational Review. 88, 1 (Mar. 2018), 26--52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17763/1943--5045--88.1.26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vossoughi, S. et al. 2016. Making Through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward Transformative Visions for Educational Equity. Harvard Educational Review. 86, 2 (Jun. 2016), 206--232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17763/0017--8055.86.2.206.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vyas, D. and Vines, J. 2019. Making at the Margins: Making in an Under-resourced e-Waste Recycling Center. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1--23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3359290.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yvonna S., L. and Guba, E. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage.Google Scholar
- 2021. Bedford Stuyvesant BK03 Demographics. NYU Furman Center.Google Scholar
- 2021. Bedford--Stuyvesant, Brooklyn. Wikipedia.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Examining the Design and Development of a Social Justice Makerspace
Recommendations
Developing Makerspaces as Sites of Entrepreneurship
CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingMakerspaces are providing new opportunities for entrepre-neurial development. Based on participant observation and a series of in-depth interviews in an entrepreneurial mak-erspace, we found that the socio-technical environment of a makerspace promotes ...
Making Community: The Wider Role of Makerspaces in Public Life
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMakerspaces public workshops where makers can share tools and knowledge are a growing resource for amateurs and professionals alike. While the role of makerspaces in innovation and peer learning is widely discussed, we attempt to look at the wider roles ...
Social Communities of Design and Makers and their Impact on Learning
The past two decades have seen a rapid growth in the Maker communities and Communities of Enquiry. Unlike social media, these communities have a unique goal of sharing special skills as well as enquiring about special knowledge areas. Advancements in ...
Comments