Hisyam Athaya
Rezky Dwi Amaliah Nadir
ABSTRACT
The concept of e-learning and its implementation have grown significantly in the past decade. The educationalist considered this adoption a valuable solution in the field of education to organize a more effective learning system supporting the traditional one. With the options of e-learning platforms and tools, many institutes from various sectors, especially schools and higher education institutes, have used Moodle as their choice of platform for the institute's e-learning needs. Regarding the information, this article aims to (1) identify the challenges faced in Moodle implementation for online learning; (2) identify some apparent trends in Moodle adoption and innovation in e-learning for future research potential. This paper then proposed theoretical contributions regarding Moodle and e-learning. The approach used in this study adopted from Kitchenham to review research sources in a systematized order followed by extended analytical review to verify each source in terms of compatibility with research questions. We identified the challenges in Moodle implementation and the corresponding research trends of e-Learning System with Moodle in 3 key themes: General topic of Moodle, Moodle adoption, and innovations in the usage of Moodle and its development.
- A. Schleicher, “The impact of COVID-19 on education: Insights from education at a glance 2020,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/education/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-education-insights-education-at-a-glance-2020.pdf.Google Scholar
- P. Nicholson, “A History of E-Learning,” in Computers and Education: E-Learning, From Theory to Practice, B. Fernández-Manjón, J. M. Sánchez-Pérez, J. A. Gómez-Pulido, M. A. Vega-Rodríguez, and J. Bravo-Rodríguez, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2007, pp. 1–11.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Campbell, “What does the ‘e’ stand for,” Melb. Dep. Sci. Math. Educ. Univ. Melb., 2004.Google Scholar
- O. Dodun , “Analysis of an E-learning Platform use by Means of the Axiomatic Design,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 34, pp. 244–249, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.07.059.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Tomsic, I. Demsar, and T. Finkst, “Using moodle e-learning platform in mechanical engineering lectures,” 2020 43rd Int. Conv. Information, Commun. Electron. Technol. MIPRO 2020 - Proc., pp. 1585–1590, 2020, doi: 10.23919/MIPRO48935.2020.9245423.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. S. Nash, Moodle Course Design Best Practices: Design and Develop Outstanding Moodle Learning Experiences, 2nd Edition. Packt Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar
- OECD, “Education responses to COVID-19: Embracing digital learning and online collaboration,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/education-responses-to-covid-19-embracing-digital-learning-and-online-collaboration-d75eb0e8/.Google Scholar
- B. A. Kitchenham and S. Charters, “Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering,” vol. 2, 2007.Google Scholar
- B. A. Kitchenham, “Systematic review in software engineering,” in Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Evidential assessment of software technologies - EAST ’12, 2012, p. 1, doi: 10.1145/2372233.2372235.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. R. Suryono, B. Purwandari, and I. Budi, “Peer to Peer (P2P) Lending Problems and Potential Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 161, pp. 204–214, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.116.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Wahono, “A Systematic Literature Review of Software Defect Prediction: Research Trends, Datasets, Methods and Frameworks,” J. Softw. Eng., vol. 1, May 2015.Google Scholar
- D. I. Sensuse, L. M. Hasani, and B. Bagustari, “Personalization Strategies Based on Felder-Silverman Learning Styles and Its Impact on Learning: A Literature Review,” in 2020 3rd International Conference on Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE), Sep. 2020, pp. 293–298, doi: 10.1109/IC2IE50715.2020.9274670.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. M. Hasani and B. Purwandari, “Model Intensi Pengajar dalam Mengadopsi Personalisasi Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Berbantuan Sistem e-Learning di Perguruan Tinggi,” Depok, 2019.Google Scholar
- S. Smith Nash and W. Rice, Moodle 3 E-Learning Course Development. 2018.Google Scholar
- J. Valverde-Berrocoso, M. del C. Garrido-Arroyo, C. Burgos-Videla, and M. B. Morales-Cevallos, “Trends in Educational Research about e-Learning: A Systematic Literature Review (2009–2018),” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 5153, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12125153.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. C. Deepak, “Evaluation of Moodle Features at Kajaani University of Applied Sciences-Case Study,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 116, pp. 121–128, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.021.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. F. M. Khamaruddin, A. Sauki, N. H. Othman Kadri, A. N. C. A. Rahim, and A. Kadri, “Technology Acceptance Model Analysis on Students’ Behavioral Intention of Using Moodle for FYP,” Proc. - 2017 7th World Eng. Educ. Forum, WEEF 2017- Conjunction with 7th Reg. Conf. Eng. Educ. Res. High. Educ. 2017, RCEE RHEd 2017, 1st Int. STEAM Educ. Conf. STEAMEC 201, pp. 724–727, 2018, doi: 10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467082.Google Scholar
- M. C. Sáiz-Manzanares, R. Marticorena-Sánchez, and C. I. García-Osorio, “Monitoring students at the university: Design and application of a moodle plugin,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 10, 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10103469.Google Scholar
- H. Abuhassna, W. M. Al-Rahmi, N. Yahya, M. A. Z. M. Zakaria, A. B. M. Kosnin, and M. Darwish, “Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 38, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Saw, K. K. Win, Z. M. M. Aung, and M. S. Oo, “Investigation of the use of learning management system (moodle) in University of Computer Studies, Mandalay,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. 744, pp. 160–168, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0869-7_18.Google Scholar
- I. Kazanidis, N. Pellas, P. Fotaris, and A. Tsinakos, “Facebook and Moodle Integration into Instructional Media Design Courses: A Comparative Analysis of Students’ Learning Experiences using the Community of Inquiry (CoI) Model,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 932–942, 2018, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1471574.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Primo, V. Ulbricht, and L. M. Fadel, “Accessibility in the virtual learning environment moodle identification of problems’ class,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. 570, pp. 571–580, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56538-5_58.Google Scholar
- I. Kadek Suartama, P. Setyosari, Sulthoni, and S. Ulfa, “Development of ubiquitous learning environment based on moodle learning management system,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 182–204, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v14i14.11775.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. V Kolekar, R. M. Pai, and M. Pai M.M., “Adaptive User Interface for Moodle based E-learning System using Learning Styles,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 135, pp. 606–615, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.226.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. B. Mpungose, “Beyond limits: Lecturers’ reflections on Moodle uptake in South African universities,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 5033–5052, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10190-8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C.-H. Luk, K.-K. Ng, and W.-M. Lam, “The acceptance of using open-source learning platform (moodle) for learning in Hong Kong's higher education,” Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 843, pp. 249–257, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0008-0_23.Google Scholar
- A. Revythi and N. Tselios, “Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2341–2355, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-09869-4.Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. E. Yawson and F. A. Yamoah, “Understanding satisfaction essentials of E-learning in higher education: A multi-generational cohort perspective,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11, p. e05519, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05519.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Al-Fraihat, M. Joy, R. Masa'deh, and J. Sinclair, “Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 102, pp. 67–86, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004.Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Karagiannis and M. Satratzemi, “An adaptive mechanism for Moodle based on automatic detection of learning styles,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1331–1357, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10639-017-9663-5.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Kerimbayev, J. Kultan, S. Abdykarimova, and A. Akramova, “LMS Moodle: Distance international education in cooperation of higher education institutions of different countries,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 2125–2139, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10639-016-9534-5.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Klindžić, N. Lazić, and M. Perković, “Implementation and tech support for moodle-based MOOC for language learning,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2019, pp. 8–12, doi: 10.1145/3371647.3372203.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. S. M. Nor and N. A. A. Kasim, “Blended Learning Web Tool Usage among Accounting Students: A Malaysian Perspective,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 31, pp. 170–185, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01144-2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Moreira, A. Mesquita, and P. Peres, “Customized X-Learning Environment: Social Networks & knowledge-sharing tools,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 121, pp. 178–185, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.025.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Witte, “‘Why Won't Moodle…?’: Using Genre Studies to Understand Students’ Approaches to Interacting with User-Interfaces,” Comput. Compos., vol. 49, pp. 48–60, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.05.004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Distante, M. Villa, N. Sansone, and S. Faralli, “MILA: A SCORM-Compliant Interactive Learning Analytics Tool for Moodle,” in 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Jul. 2020, pp. 169–171, doi: 10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00056.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Krasnova, “A Paradigm Shift: Blended Learning Integration in Russian Higher Education,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 166, pp. 399–403, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.543.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Krasnova and M. Demeshko, “Tutor-mediated Support in Blended Learning,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 166, pp. 404–408, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.544.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Asoodar, S. Vaezi, and B. Izanloo, “Framework to improve e-learner satisfaction and further strengthen e-learning implementation,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 63, pp. 704–716, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.060.Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. A. Cidral, T. Oliveira, M. Di Felice, and M. Aparicio, “E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study,” Comput. Educ., vol. 122, pp. 273–290, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. A. Nugroho, D. Setyorini, and B. T. Novitasari, “The Role of Satisfaction on Perceived Value and E-Learning Usage Continuity Relationship,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 161, pp. 82–89, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.102.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. G. Sorokova, “Skepticism and learning difficulties in a digital environment at the Bachelor's and Master's levels: are preconceptions valid?,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11, p. e05335, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05335.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. B. Eom and N. J. Ashill, “A System ’ s View of E-Learning Success Model,” 2018, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 42–76.Google Scholar
- M. V. Zharova, S. Y. Trapitsin, V. V. Timchenko, and A. I. Skurihina, “Problems and Opportunities of Using LMS Moodle before and during COVID-19 Quarantine: Opinion of Teachers and Students,” in 2020 International Conference Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies (IT&QM&IS), Sep. 2020, pp. 554–557, doi: 10.1109/ITQMIS51053.2020.9322906.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Pattanasith, N. Rampai, and J. Kanperm, “The Development Model of Learning though Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) for Graduated Students, Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 176, pp. 60–64, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.444.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Harrati, I. Bouchrika, A. Tari, and A. Ladjailia, “Exploring user satisfaction for e-learning systems via usage-based metrics and system usability scale analysis,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 61, pp. 463–471, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.051.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. B. Dias, S. J. Hadjileontiadou, L. J. Hadjileontiadis, and J. A. Diniz, “Fuzzy cognitive mapping of LMS users’ Quality of Interaction within higher education blended-learning environment,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 42, no. 21, pp. 7399–7423, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.05.048.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Aznar and J. I. Hernando, “Novel Educational Assessment for Building Structures: Automatic Evaluation of On-line Graphics,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 176, pp. 602–609, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.516.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Zou, Q. Liu, and Z. Yang, “Development of a Moodle course for schoolchildren's table tennis learning based on Competence Motivation Theory: Its effectiveness in comparison to traditional training method,” Comput. Educ., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 294–303, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.008.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Costa, H. Alvelos, and L. Teixeira, “The Use of Moodle e-learning Platform: A Study in a Portuguese University,” Procedia Technol., vol. 5, pp. 334–343, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.037.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M.-D. Dascalu , “Before and during COVID-19: A Cohesion Network Analysis of students’ online participation in moodle courses,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 121, p. 106780, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106780.Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Lebeaux , “Introducing an Open-Source Course Management System (Moodle) for Blended learning on infectious diseases and microbiology: A pre-post observational study,” Infect. Dis. Now, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 477–483, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.idnow.2020.11.002.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Moodle Implementation for E-Learning: A Systematic Review
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Smart adaptive learning based on Moodle platform
SCAMS '17: Proceedings of the Mediterranean Symposium on Smart City ApplicationWith the increased needs of learners and teachers to have remote access to learning content, the use of course management tools become crucial. Today, with the development of technology many course management systems have appeared. These systems include ...
The experience of using Moodle and Elluminate Live! as learning tools in the Hashemite University case study: computer skills course
In Jordan, e-learning tools are used to enhance the traditional learning process in traditional class rooms. Course management systems CMS are being utilised by many Jordanian universities to improve the learning process. The Hashemite University ...
Cooperative-blended learning using Moodle as an open source learning platform
Some research in physics teaching in secondary schools shows that cooperative learning has the potential to improve student performance. Moodle is a learning management system that has open source platform modules that can be customised according to ...
Comments