skip to main content
10.1145/3479645.3479681acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessietConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparison of Land Cover Classification of Ir Sutami Dam Using Machine Learning and Multisource Satellite Imagery

Published:03 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The latest land cover information in the form of maps resulting from image classification can be obtained through remote sensing techniques that utilize satellite imagery, such as Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2. However, no study compares the two satellite images with high classification algorithm accuracy. The previous literature describes several techniques that can be used to classify land cover, but there has been no specific use of similar techniques in the Ir. Sutami. In this study, the author uses a classification technique using the CART (Classification and Regression Tree) algorithm which can present the classification results as a simple tree structure to make the classification process easier and closer. The results of processing Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery in 2020 show accuracy test results at 91% and 97% for vegetation classes, water bodies, built land, open land, and rice fields. We hope this research can help in providing information to cover the land in the area around Ir. Sutami to avoid the negative impacts of future land-use changes.

References

  1. F. Ramdani, A. P. Putra, and B. N. Utomo, “Historical urban land use transformation in virtual geo-library,” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1500–1511, 2015, doi: 10.3390/ijgi4031500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. I. Y. Evina, “Perubahan tata guna lahan dan perubahan sosial masyarakat sekitar bendungan Ir. Sutami Karangkates tahun 1960-1998,” 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wahyunto and A. Dariah, “Degradasi Lahan di Indonesia: Kondisi Existing, Karakteristik, dan Penyeragaman Definisi Mendukung Gerakan Menuju Satu Peta,” J. Sumberd. Lahan, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 81–93, 2014, doi: 10.2018/jsdl.v8i2.6470.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. F. Gao and M. Anderson, “Evaluating Yield Variability of Corn and Soybean Using Landsat-8, Sentinel-2 and Modis in Google Earth Engine,” Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp., pp. 7286–7289, 2019, doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8897990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. L. O. K. Mastu, B. Nababan, and J. P. Panjaitan, “Pemetaan Habitat Bentik Berbasis Objek Menggunakan Citra Sentinel-2 Di Perairan Pulau Wangi-Wangi Kabupaten Wakatobi,” J. Ilmu dan Teknol. Kelaut. Trop., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 381–396, 2018, doi: 10.29244/jitkt.v10i2.21039.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. N. Arif and F. S. Wahyuni, “Penggunaan Metode Machine Learning Untuk Pengenalan Pola Tutupan Lahan pada Citra Satelit,” vol. 5, pp. 6–7, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. N. A. Wahap and H. Z. M. Shafri, “Utilization of Google Earth Engine (GEE) for land cover monitoring over Klang Valley, Malaysia,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 540, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/540/1/012003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. F. Aziz, S. Defiyanti, and B. N. Sari, “Perbandingan Algoritma Cart Dan K-Nearest Neighbor Untuk Prediksi Luas Lahan Panen Tanaman Padi Di Kabupaten Karawang,” J. TAM (Technology Accept. Model., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 74–78, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Xu, H. Du, and X. Zhang, “A classification approach for urban metabolism using the CART model and its application in China,” Ecol. Indic., vol. 123, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. K. V. Ramana Rao and P. Rajesh Kumar, “Land cover classification using landsat-8 optical data and supervised classifiers,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 101–104, 2018, doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.17.11567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. C. Hansen, R. Sohlberg, R. S. Defries, and J. R. G. Townshend, Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach, vol. 21, no. 6–7. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SIET '21: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology
    September 2021
    354 pages
    ISBN:9781450384070
    DOI:10.1145/3479645

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 3 November 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate45of57submissions,79%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format