Tejtasin Phiasai
ABSTRACT
Human activity recognition has been a very active topic in pervasive computing for several years for its important applications in assisted living, healthcare, and security surveillance. Many researchers are finding and representing the details of human body gestures to determine human activity. While simple activities can be easily recognized only by acceleration data, our research has focused on the recognition and understanding the various activities in daily living. In this work, we address this problem by proposing approach theory of deep learning with the Deep belief network. Deep belief network comprises a series of Restricted Boltzmann Machines will be formed by superimposed multiple Restricted Boltzmann Machines and training the model parameters for data reconstruction, feature construction and classification. We tested our approach on PASCAL VOC datasets. The experimental results indicate that our proposed approach offers significant performance improvements with the maximum of 79.8%.
- A. Bulling, U. Blanke, and B. Schiele. 2014. A Tutorial on Human Activity Recognition Using Body-worn Inertial Sensors. ACM Computer Survey. Vol. 46, No. 3.Google Scholar
- T. Huynh and B. Schiele. 2005. Analyzing Features for Activity Recognition. In Proceedings of the 2005 Joint Conference on Smart Objects and Ambient Intelligence: Innovative Context-aware Services: Usages and Technologies. ser. sOc-EUSAI ’05). New York, NY, USA: ACM. 159–163.Google Scholar
- Y. Lu, Y. Wei, L. Liu, J. Zhong, L. Sun, and Y. Liu. 2016. Towards unsupervised physical activity recognition using smartphone accelerometers. Multimedia Tools and Applications. Vol. 76, 10701–10719.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Ignatov and V. Strijov. 2016. Human activity recognition using quasiperiodic time series collected from a single tri-axial accelerometer Multimedia Tools and Applications. Vol. 75, 7257–7270.Google Scholar
- Y. Bazi and F. Melgani, 2006. Toward an optimal SVM classification system for hyperspectral remote sensing images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. Vol. 44. 3374–3385.Google Scholar
- C. Catal, S. Tufekci, E. Pirmit, and G. Kocabag. 2015. On the use of ensemble of classifiers for accelerometer-based activity recognition. Applied Soft Computing. Vol. 37. 1018–1022.Google Scholar
- M. N. S. Zainudin, M. N. Sulaiman, N. Mustapha, and T. Perumal. 2015. Activity recognition based on accelerometer sensor using combinational classifiers. in Open Systems (ICOS), 2015 IEEE Confernece on. IEEE. 68–73.Google Scholar
- LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D.,Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., and Jackel, L. D. 1989. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip coderecognition. Neural Computation. Vol.1. 541- 551.Google Scholar
- Hinton, G.E. 2009. Deep belief networks. Scholarpedia, Vol. 4, 5. 5947.Google Scholar
- Hinton, G. E. 2002. Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural Compu-tation, 14, 1771-1800.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Gao, L. Gao, Q. Gao and H. Wang. 2014. An Intrusion Detection Model Based on Deep Belief Networks. 2014 Second International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data. 247-252.Google Scholar
- C. Geng and J. Song. 2016. Human action recognition based on convolutional neural networks with a convolutional auto-encoder. 5th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Automation Engineering, Sanya, China. 933-938.Google Scholar
- J. B. Yang, M. N. Nguyen, P. P. San, X. L. Li, and S. Krishnaswamy. 2015. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks on Multichannel Time Series for Human Activity Recognition. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’15.AAAI ). 3995–4001.Google Scholar
- Y. Chen and Y. Xue. 2015. A Deep Learning Approach to Human Activity Recognition Based on Single Accelerometer. In Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). 2015 IEEE International Conference on IEEE. 1488–1492.Google Scholar
- M. A. Alsheikh, A. Selim, D. Niyato, L. Doyle, S. Lin, and H.-P. Tan. 2015. Deep Activity Recognition Models with Triaxial Accelerometers. Nov.Google Scholar
- H. Zhang, F. Zhou, W. Zhang, X. Yuan and Chen, Z. (2014). Real-time action recognition based on a modified deep belief network model. IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation, Tianjin, China, 225-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICInfA.2014.6932657Google Scholar
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Andriy Mnih, Geoffrey Hinto. 2007. Restricted Boltzmann machines for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning (ICML '07), June. 791–798. https://doi.org/10.1145/1273496.1273596Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cortes, Corinna; Vapnik and Vladimir N. 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning. Vol. 20, 3. 273–297.Google Scholar
- Schmidhuber, J. 2015. Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overview. Neural Networks. Vol 61. 85–117.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell. 2015. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google Scholar
- Cícero Nogueira dos Santos and Maira Gatti. 2014. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentiment Analysis of Short Texts. In COLING, 69–78.Google Scholar
- M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. 2010. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge, International journal of computer vision, 88, 2, 303–38.Google Scholar
- Jan R. Benetka John Krumm Paul N. Bennett. 2019. Understanding Context for Tasks and Activities The Fourth ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR 2019).Google Scholar
- Jorge-L Reyes-Ortiz, Luca Oneto, Albert Samà, Xavier Parra, and Davide Anguita. 2016. Transition-aware human activity recognition using smartphones. Neurocomputing. 171, 754–767.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jan R. Benetka, John Krumm, Paul N. 2019. Bennett, Understanding Context for Tasks and Activities. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR '19). March, 133–142Google ScholarDigital Library
- Powers, David M. W. 2011. Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC. Informedness, Markedness & Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies. 2, 1. 37–63.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Deep Belief Network based Machine Learning for Daily Activities Classification
Recommendations
SVM-based multimodal classification of activities of daily living in health smart homes: sensors, algorithms, and first experimental results
Special section on affective and pervasive computing for healthcareBy 2050, about one third of the French population will be over 65. Our laboratory's current research focuses on the monitoring of elderly people at home, to detect a loss of autonomy as early as possible. Our aim is to quantify criteria such as the ...
Predicting daily activities from egocentric images using deep learning
ISWC '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable ComputersWe present a method to analyze images taken from a passive egocentric wearable camera along with the contextual information, such as time and day of week, to learn and predict everyday activities of an individual. We collected a dataset of 40,103 ...
An Adaptive Rule-Based Approach to Classifying Activities of Daily Living
ICHI '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Healthcare InformaticsThe need for a human activity recognition system arises when designing a "health smart home" which monitors its occupants to assess their health status. In this work, a rule-based system was constructed to classify the common activities of daily living ...
Comments