skip to main content
research-article

Weakly Supervised Spatial Deep Learning for Earth Image Segmentation Based on Imperfect Polyline Labels

Published: 05 January 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In recent years, deep learning has achieved tremendous success in image segmentation for computer vision applications. The performance of these models heavily relies on the availability of large-scale high-quality training labels (e.g., PASCAL VOC 2012). Unfortunately, such large-scale high-quality training data are often unavailable in many real-world spatial or spatiotemporal problems in earth science and remote sensing (e.g., mapping the nationwide river streams for water resource management). Although extensive efforts have been made to reduce the reliance on labeled data (e.g., semi-supervised or unsupervised learning, few-shot learning), the complex nature of geographic data such as spatial heterogeneity still requires sufficient training labels when transferring a pre-trained model from one region to another. On the other hand, it is often much easier to collect lower-quality training labels with imperfect alignment with earth imagery pixels (e.g., through interpreting coarse imagery by non-expert volunteers). However, directly training a deep neural network on imperfect labels with geometric annotation errors could significantly impact model performance. Existing research that overcomes imperfect training labels either focuses on errors in label class semantics or characterizes label location errors at the pixel level. These methods do not fully incorporate the geometric properties of label location errors in the vector representation. To fill the gap, this article proposes a weakly supervised learning framework to simultaneously update deep learning model parameters and infer hidden true vector label locations. Specifically, we model label location errors in the vector representation to partially reserve geometric properties (e.g., spatial contiguity within line segments). Evaluations on real-world datasets in the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) refinement application illustrate that the proposed framework outperforms baseline methods in classification accuracy.

References

[1]
Joaquín Abellán and Andrés R. Masegosa. 2012. Bagging schemes on the presence of class noise in classification. Expert Systems with Applications 39, 8 (2012), 6827–6837.
[2]
David Acuna, Amlan Kar, and Sanja Fidler. 2019. Devil is in the edges: Learning semantic boundaries from noisy annotations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 11075–11083.
[3]
Vijay Badrinarayanan, Alex Kendall, and Roberto Cipolla. 2017. Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 39, 12 (2017), 2481–2495.
[4]
John E. Ball, Derek T. Anderson, and Chee Seng Chan Sr. 2017. Comprehensive survey of deep learning in remote sensing: Theories, tools, and challenges for the community. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 11, 4 (2017), 42609.
[5]
Yoshua Bengio. 2012. Deep learning of representations for unsupervised and transfer learning. In Proceedings of ICML Workshop on Unsupervised and Transfer Learning. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 17–36.
[6]
Alexandre Carlier, Martin Danelljan, Alexandre Alahi, and Radu Timofte. 2020. DeepSVG: A hierarchical generative network for vector graphics animation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.11301 (2020).
[7]
Honglie Chen, Weidi Xie, Andrea Vedaldi, and Andrew Zisserman. 2019. AutoCorrect: Deep inductive alignment of noisy geometric annotations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.05263 (2019).
[8]
Liang-Chieh Chen, George Papandreou, Iasonas Kokkinos, Kevin Murphy, and Alan L. Yuille. 2017. Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected CRFs. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 40, 4 (2017), 834–848.
[9]
Liang-Chieh Chen, Yukun Zhu, George Papandreou, Florian Schroff, and Hartwig Adam. 2018. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV’18). 801–818.
[10]
Marius Cordts, Mohamed Omran, Sebastian Ramos, Timo Rehfeld, Markus Enzweiler, Rodrigo Benenson, Uwe Franke, Stefan Roth, and Bernt Schiele. 2016. The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’16).
[11]
Lívia Castro Degrossi, João Porto de Albuquerque, Roberto dos Santos Rocha, and Alexander Zipf. 2018. A taxonomy of quality assessment methods for volunteered and crowdsourced geographic information. Transactions in GIS 22, 2 (2018), 542–560.
[12]
Thomas G. Dietterich. 2000. An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: Bagging, boosting, and randomization. Machine Learning 40, 2 (2000), 139–157.
[13]
Helen Dorn, Tobias Törnros, and Alexander Zipf. 2015. Quality evaluation of VGI using authoritative data—A comparison with land use data in Southern Germany. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4, 3 (2015), 1657–1671.
[14]
Emre Eftelioglu, Zhe Jiang, Reem Ali, and Shashi Shekhar. 2016. Spatial computing perspective on food energy and water nexus. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 6, 1 (2016), 62–76.
[15]
Emre Eftelioglu, Zhe Jiang, Xun Tang, and Shashi Shekhar. 2017. The nexus of food, energy, and water resources: Visions and challenges in spatial computing. In Advances in Geocomputation. Springer, 5–20.
[16]
M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. [n.d.]. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2012 (VOC2012) Results. http://www.pascal-network.org/challenges/VOC/voc2012/workshop/index.html.
[17]
Benoit Frénay and Michel Verleysen. 2014. Classification in the presence of label noise: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 25, 5 (2014), 845–869.
[18]
Alberto Garcia-Garcia, Sergio Orts-Escolano, Sergiu Oprea, Victor Villena-Martinez, Pablo Martinez-Gonzalez, and Jose Garcia-Rodriguez. 2018. A survey on deep learning techniques for image and video semantic segmentation. Applied Soft Computing 70 (2018), 41–65.
[19]
Michael F. Goodchild and Linna Li. 2012. Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Statistics 1 (2012), 110–120.
[20]
Wenchong He and Zhe Jiang. 2020. Semi-supervised learning with the EM algorithm: A comparative study between unstructured and structured prediction. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2020). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9177326.
[21]
Wenchong He, Arpan Man Sainju, Zhe Jiang, and Da Yan. 2021. Deep neural network for 3D surface segmentation based on contour tree hierarchy. In Proceedings of the 2021 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM’21). SIAM, 253–261.
[22]
Benjamin Herfort, Hao Li, Sascha Fendrich, Sven Lautenbach, and Alexander Zipf. 2019. Mapping human settlements with higher accuracy and less volunteer efforts by combining crowdsourcing and deep learning. Remote Sensing 11, 15 (2019), 1799.
[23]
Mohammad Hesam Hesamian, Wenjing Jia, Xiangjian He, and Paul Kennedy. 2019. Deep learning techniques for medical image segmentation: Achievements and challenges. Journal of Digital Imaging 32, 4 (2019), 582–596.
[24]
Yi Hong and Weiping Zhu. 2015. Spatial co-training for semi-supervised image classification. Pattern Recognition Letters 63 (2015), 59–65.
[25]
Timothy Hospedales, Antreas Antoniou, Paul Micaelli, and Amos Storkey. 2020. Meta-learning in neural networks: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.05439 (2020).
[26]
Zhe Jiang. 2018. A survey on spatial prediction methods. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 31, 9 (2018), 1645–1664.
[27]
Zhe Jiang. 2020. Spatial structured prediction models: Applications, challenges, and techniques. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 38714–38727.
[28]
Zhe Jiang and Arpan Man Sainju. 2019. Hidden Markov contour tree: A spatial structured model for hydrological applications. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 804–813.
[29]
Zhe Jiang and Arpan Man Sainju. 2021. A hidden Markov tree model for flood extent mapping in heavily vegetated areas based on high resolution aerial imagery and DEM: A case study on hurricane matthew floods. International Journal of Remote Sensing 42, 3 (2021), 1160–1179.
[30]
Zhe Jiang and Shashi Shekhar. 2017. Spatial Big Data Science. Schweiz: Springer International Publishing AG.
[31]
Zhe Jiang, Miao Xie, and Arpan Man Sainju. 2021. Geographical hidden Markov tree. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 33, 2 (2021), 506–520.
[32]
Hiroshi Kajino, Yuta Tsuboi, Issei Sato, and Hisashi Kashima. 2012. Learning from crowds and experts. In Proceedings of the Human Computation Workshop. 107–113.
[33]
Anuj Karpatne, Zhe Jiang, Ranga Raju Vatsavai, Shashi Shekhar, and Vipin Kumar. 2016. Monitoring land-cover changes: A machine-learning perspective. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine 4, 2 (2016), 8–21.
[34]
A Kendall, V. Badrinarayanan, and R. Cipolla. 2017. Bayesian segnet: Model uncertainty in deep convolutional encoder-decoder architectures for scene understanding. In British Machine Vision Conference 2017 (BMVC’17).
[35]
Alex Kendall and Yarin Gal. 2017. What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 5580–5590.
[36]
Simon A. A. Kohl, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Clemens Meyer, Jeffrey De Fauw, Joseph R. Ledsam, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, S. M. Ali Eslami, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Olaf Ronneberger. 2018. A probabilistic U-net for segmentation of ambiguous images. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 6965–6975.
[37]
Raphael Gontijo Lopes, David Ha, Douglas Eck, and Jonathon Shlens. 2019. A learned representation for scalable vector graphics. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 7930–7939.
[38]
Zhiwu Lu, Zhenyong Fu, Tao Xiang, Peng Han, Liwei Wang, and Xin Gao. 2017. Learning from weak and noisy labels for semantic segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 39, 3 (2017), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2552172
[39]
Lei Ma, Yu Liu, Xueliang Zhang, Yuanxin Ye, Gaofei Yin, and Brian Alan Johnson. 2019. Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 152, November 2018 (2019), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015
[40]
David R. Maidment. 2017. Conceptual framework for the national flood interoperability experiment. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 53, 2 (2017), 245–257.
[41]
Shervin Minaee, Yuri Boykov, Fatih Porikli, Antonio Plaza, Nasser Kehtarnavaz, and Demetri Terzopoulos. 2020. Image segmentation using deep learning: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.05566 (2020).
[42]
Volodymyr Mnih and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2012. Learning to label aerial images from noisy data. In Proceedings of the 29th International conference on machine learning (ICML’12). 567–574.
[43]
Miguel Monteiro, Loïc Le Folgoc, Daniel Coelho de Castro, Nick Pawlowski, Bernardo Marques, Konstantinos Kamnitsas, Mark van der Wilk, and Ben Glocker. 2020. Stochastic segmentation networks: Modelling spatially correlated aleatoric uncertainty. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020 (NeurIPS’20), virtual, Hugo Larochelle, Marc’Aurelio Ranzato, Raia Hadsell, Maria-Florina Balcan, and Hsuan-Tien Lin (Eds.). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/95f8d9901ca8878e291552f001f67692-Abstract.html.
[44]
Richard B. Moore, Lucinda D. McKay, Alan H. Rea, Timothy R. Bondelid, Curtis V. Price, Thomas G. Dewald, and Craig M. Johnston. 2019. User’s Guide for the National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus) High Resolution. Technical Report. US Geological Survey.
[45]
Kun Ouyang, Reza Shokri, David S. Rosenblum, and Wenzhuo Yang. 2018. A non-parametric generative model for human trajectories. In IJCAI. 3812–3817.
[46]
Giorgio Patrini, Alessandro Rozza, Aditya Krishna Menon, Richard Nock, and Lizhen Qu. 2017. Making deep neural networks robust to label noise: A loss correction approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1944–1952.
[47]
Sandra K. Poppenga, Dean B. Gesch, and Bruce B. Worstell. 2013. Hydrography change detection: The usefulness of surface channels derived from LiDAR DEMs for updating mapped hydrography 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 49, 2 (2013), 371–389.
[48]
Scott Reed, Honglak Lee, Dragomir Anguelov, Christian Szegedy, Dumitru Erhan, and Andrew Rabinovich. 2014. Training deep neural networks on noisy labels with bootstrapping. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6596 (2014).
[49]
David Rolnick, Andreas Veit, Serge Belongie, and Nir Shavit. 2017. Deep learning is robust to massive label noise. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.10694 (2017).
[50]
Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 234–241.
[51]
Arpan Man Sainju, Wenchong He, and Zhe Jiang. 2020. A hidden Markov contour tree model for spatial structured prediction. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2020). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9119135.
[52]
Arpan Man Sainju, Wenchong He, Zhe Jiang, and Da Yan. 2020. Spatial classification with limited observations based on physics-aware structural constraint. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 898–905.
[53]
Arpan Man Sainju, Wenchong He, Zhe Jiang, Da Yan, and Haiquan Chen. 2021. Flood inundation mapping with limited observations based on physics-aware topography constraint. Frontiers in Big Data 4 (2021), 47. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2021.707951
[54]
L. D. Schultz, M. P. Heck, David Hockman-Wert, T. Allai, S. Wenger, N. A. Cook, and Jason B. Dunham. 2017. Spatial and temporal variability in the effects of wildfire and drought on thermal habitat for a desert trout. Journal of Arid Environments 145 (2017), 60–68.
[55]
Hansi Senaratne, Amin Mobasheri, Ahmed Loai Ali, Cristina Capineri, and Mordechai Haklay. 2017. A review of volunteered geographic information quality assessment methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 31, 1 (2017), 139–167.
[56]
Shashi Shekhar, Zhe Jiang, Reem Y. Ali, Emre Eftelioglu, Xun Tang, Venkata Gunturi, and Xun Zhou. 2015. Spatiotemporal data mining: A computational perspective. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4, 4 (2015), 2306–2338.
[57]
J. D. Simley and W. J. Carswell Jr. 2009. The national map–hydrography: US geological survey fact sheet 2009–3054. US Geological Survey National Center, Reston, VA.
[58]
Lawrence V. Stanislawski, Ethan J. Shavers, Shaowen Wang, Zhe Jiang, E. Lynn Usery, Evan Moak, Alexander Duffy, and Joel Schott. 2021. Extensibility of U-Net neural network model for hydrographic feature extraction and implications for hydrologic modeling. Remote Sensing 13, 12 (2021), 2368.
[59]
Nima Tajbakhsh, Laura Jeyaseelan, Qian Li, Jeffrey N. Chiang, Zhihao Wu, and Xiaowei Ding. 2020. Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation. Medical Image Analysis 63 (2020), 101693. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101693
[60]
Grigorios Tsagkatakis, Anastasia Aidini, Konstantina Fotiadou, Michalis Giannopoulos, Anastasia Pentari, and Panagiotis Tsakalides. 2019. Survey of deep-learning approaches for remote sensing observation enhancement. Sensors 19, 18 (2019), 3929.
[61]
Joaquin Vanschoren. 2018. Meta-learning: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.03548 (2018).
[62]
Senzhang Wang, Jiannong Cao, and Philip Yu. 2020. Deep learning for spatio-temporal data mining: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2020.3025580
[63]
Yu-Xiong Wang, Ross Girshick, Martial Hebert, and Bharath Hariharan. 2018. Low-shot learning from imaginary data. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 7278–7286.
[64]
Zhihao Wei, Kebin Jia, Pengyu Liu, Xiaowei Jia, Yiqun Xie, and Zhe Jiang. 2021. Large-scale river mapping using contrastive learning and multi-source satellite imagery. Remote Sensing 13, 15 (2021), 2893.
[65]
Wendy Wright, Beth Nielsen, Jeffrey D. Mullen, and John Dowd. 2012. Agricultural Groundwater Policy during Drought: A Spatially Differentiated Approach for the Flint River Basin. Technical Report.
[66]
Tong Xiao, Tian Xia, Yi Yang, Chang Huang, and Xiaogang Wang. 2015. Learning from massive noisy labeled data for image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2691–2699.
[67]
Miao Xie, Zhe Jiang, and Arpan Man Sainju. 2018. Geographical hidden Markov tree for flood extent mapping. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2545–2554.
[68]
Zewei Xu, Shaowen Wang, Lawrence V. Stanislawski, Zhe Jiang, Nattapon Jaroenchai, Arpan Man Sainju, Ethan Shavers, E. Lynn Usery, Li Chen, Zhiyu Li, et al. 2021. An attention U-Net model for detection of fine-scale hydrologic streamlines. Environmental Modelling & Software 140 (2021), 104992.
[69]
Lin Yang, Yizhe Zhang, Jianxu Chen, Siyuan Zhang, and Danny Z. Chen. 2017. Suggestive annotation: A deep active learning framework for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention. Springer, 399–407.
[70]
Zhiding Yu, Weiyang Liu, Yang Zou, Chen Feng, Srikumar Ramalingam, B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar, and Jan Kautz. 2018. Simultaneous edge alignment and learning. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV’18). 388–404.
[71]
Xiangrong Zhang, Qiang Song, Ruochen Liu, Wenna Wang, and Licheng Jiao. 2014. Modified co-training with spectral and spatial views for semisupervised hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 7, 6 (2014), 2044–2055.
[72]
Tongxue Zhou, Su Ruan, and Stéphane Canu. 2019. A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion. Array 3 (2019), 100004.
[73]
Xiaojin Zhu. 2005. Semi-supervised learning literature survey. (2005). https://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/60444.
[74]
Xiao Xiang Zhu, Devis Tuia, Lichao Mou, Gui-Song Xia, Liangpei Zhang, Feng Xu, and Friedrich Fraundorfer. 2017. Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine 5, 4 (2017), 8–36.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Cascaded Alternating Refinement Transformer for Few-shot Medical Image SegmentationACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/3709145Online publication date: 20-Dec-2024
  • (2024)An Unbiased Risk Estimator for Partial Label Learning with Augmented ClassesACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/370013715:6(1-22)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
  • (2024)An efficient urban flood mapping framework towards disaster response driven by weakly supervised semantic segmentation with decoupled training samplesISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.12.009207(338-358)Online publication date: Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 13, Issue 2
April 2022
392 pages
ISSN:2157-6904
EISSN:2157-6912
DOI:10.1145/3508464
  • Editor:
  • Huan Liu
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 January 2022
Accepted: 01 August 2021
Revised: 01 March 2021
Received: 01 December 2020
Published in TIST Volume 13, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Deep learning
  2. earth imagery segmentation
  3. imperfect labels
  4. weakly supervised learning

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • National Science Foundation (NSF)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
  • Microsoft AI for Earth Grant
  • Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE)

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)65
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Cascaded Alternating Refinement Transformer for Few-shot Medical Image SegmentationACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/3709145Online publication date: 20-Dec-2024
  • (2024)An Unbiased Risk Estimator for Partial Label Learning with Augmented ClassesACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/370013715:6(1-22)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
  • (2024)An efficient urban flood mapping framework towards disaster response driven by weakly supervised semantic segmentation with decoupled training samplesISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.12.009207(338-358)Online publication date: Jan-2024
  • (2024)A Rumor Propagation Model Based on Potential Behavior and Multi Model FusionInformation Sciences10.1016/j.ins.2024.121789(121789)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)Transfer learning with convolutional neural networks for hydrological streamline delineationEnvironmental Modelling & Software10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106165181:COnline publication date: 18-Nov-2024
  • (2024)A Survey of Machine Learning Algorithms for Defective Steel Plates Classification8th International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering (CCIE2024)10.1007/978-981-97-6934-6_55(467-476)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Crowd Flow Prediction: An Integrated Approach Using Dynamic Spatial–Temporal Adaptive Modeling for Pattern Flow RelationshipsJournal of Forecasting10.1002/for.3213Online publication date: 10-Nov-2024
  • (2023)Transfer Learning across Graph Convolutional Networks: Methods, Theory, and ApplicationsACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/361737618:1(1-23)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Deep Learning for Spatiotemporal Big Data: Opportunities and Challenges [Vision Paper]2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData)10.1109/BigData59044.2023.10386256(1157-1161)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
  • (2022)Semisupervised Semantic Segmentation with Mutual Correction LearningComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience10.1155/2022/86536922022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media