skip to main content
10.1145/3481127.3481130acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Management Accounting Change and CSR Budgetary Control of an Oil and Gas company in Crisis: A Literature Review

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The world oil price crisis has forced national oil and gas companies to make changes. In response to the environmental changes, the companies have been adopting various practices to survive in business. Most companies abandon their CSR activities to emphasize efficiency by reason of the companies’ survival without considering social and environmental interests. To deal with an uncertain economic environment due to falling world oil prices, SKK Migas is preparing strategic adaptations. Management accounting can play an important role in the company's surviving strategy to support the CSR program. The literature review will be supported by NIS (New Institutional Sociology Theory), this theory interprets accounting practices as characteristics that could legitimize organizations. The NIS focus on social and technical, both within and without private organizations, that considered in the process of managerial accounting changes. In practice, it may be difficult to realize predetermined means-end relationships in the use of accounting to improve financial results under the management approach, given the wider concerns of organizational change. This study investigates management accounting practices in organizational change, specifically by focusing on internal policy for the CSR program. The contribution of this study to the literature involves an understanding of CSR activities with budgetary control as a means of controlling management accounting practices.

References

  1. Aradea A., Yuliana, A., Himawan, H. 2010. " Change Management Application to Improve Business Processes in Achieving Organizational Competitive Advantages." Seminar Nasional Informatika. Yogyakarta, Indonesia. "Veteran" University of National Development Yogyakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, M., Schaltegger, S., Zvezdov, D. 2013. Exploring Corporate Practices in Management Accounting for Sustainability. ICAEW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 4(4), 497–505.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Carruthers, B.G. 1995. “Accounting, Ambiguity and the New Institutionalism”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(4), pp. 313-328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cheney G, & McMillan J.J. 1990. Organizational rhetoric and the practice of criticism, J. Appl. Comm. Res. 18(2): 93-114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Endenich C. 2014. "Economic crisis as a driver of management accounting change: Comparative evidence from Germany and Spain," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 15(1), pages 123-149, May.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. CIMA. 2016. Financial Crisis and Changes in Management Controls in Banks. Copenhagen Business School.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dillard, J.F., Rigsby, J.T. and Goodman, C. (2004), “The making and remaking of organization context: duality and the institutionalization process”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 506-42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160. Accounting Research 19: 287–300. doi:10. 1016/j.mar.2008.09.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Epstein, E. M. 1989. Business Ethics, Corporate Good Citizenship and the Corporate Social Policy Process, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 8, pp. 583-595.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Erokhin, Vasily & Endovitsky, Dmitry & Bobryshev, Alexey & Kulagina, Natalia & Ivolga, Anna. 2019. Management Accounting Change as a Sustainable Economic Development Strategy during Pre-Recession and Recession Periods: Evidence from Russia. Sustainability. 11. 3139. 10.3390/su11113139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernandez, B. 2016. Reforming the Oil Crisis. Sense & Sustainability: Fresh Perspectives on Sustainable Development. https://www.senseandsustainability.net/2016/03/04/reforming-the-oil-crisis/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Frederick, W. C. 1960. The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review, 2(4), 54–61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman, M. 2007. 'The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits'. in WC Zimmerli, M Holzinger & K Richter (eds). Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 173-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Giannarakis, G., & Theotokas, I. 2011. The Effect of Financial Crisis in Corporate Social Responsibility Performance. International Journal of Marketing Studies Vol. 3, No. 1. www.ccsenet.org/ijmsGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Heeren, A., V. 1998. Management Accounting for sustainable development. A chain related case study between Costa Rica and the Netherlands. Partnership and Leadership, Building Alliances for a Sustainable Future.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacob, C., K. 2012. The Impact of Financial Crisis on Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Implications for Reputation Risk Management. Journal of Sustainability Science and ManagementGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jalagat, R. 2016. The Impact of Change and Change Management in Achieving Corporate Goals and Objectives: Organizational Perspective. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, T. M. 1980. Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59–67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Karaibrahimoglu, Y., Z.2010. Corporate social responsibility in times of financial crisis. African Journal of Business Management Vol. 4(4), pp. 382-389, April 2010 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM ISSN 1993-8233 © 2010 Academic JournalsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kasim, N., A. 2004. Corporatisation, Loose Coupling and Stability - Accounting Change in a Malaysian Public Utility. Thesis Manchester School of Accounting and FinanceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Klára, P. 2011. The Impact of Recession on the Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility in Companies Lapsley, I. and Mitchell, F. (1996), “The accounting challenge: performance measurement in the private and public sectors”, in Lapsley, I. and Mitchell, F. (Eds), Accounting and Performance Measurement: Issues in the Private and Public Sectors, Paul Chapman, London, UK, pp. 3-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Malmi, T., and D. A. Brown. 2008. “Management Control Systems as a Package – Opportunities, Challenges and Research Directions.” ManagementGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Marquez, T., Galende, J., Cruz. P., Ferreira, M. P., 2014. Surviving downsizing and innovative behaviors: a matter of organizational commitment. International Journal of Manpower Vol. 35 No. 7, 2014 pp. 930-955 © Emerald Group Publishing Limited 0143-7720 DOI 10.1108/IJM-03-2012-0049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Marrewijk, M. 2003. Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion (Vol. 44).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Otley, D. 1999. Performance Management: A Framework For Management Control Systems Research. Management Accounting Research 10(4):363-382. DOI: 10.1006/mare.1999.0115Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Parket, R. and Eibert, H. 1975. “Social responsibility: the underlying factors”, Business Horizons, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 5-10Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Pavlatos, O.; Kostakis, H. 2015. Management Accounting Practices before and during Economic Crisis: Evidence from Greece. Adv. Account. Inc. Adv. Int. Account. 2015, 31, 150–164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rausch, A., & Brauneis, A. 2015. The effect of accountability on management accountants' selection of information. Review of Managerial Science, 9(3), 487–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0126-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Reeves, M. & Deimler., M. 2011. Adaptability: The New Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2011/07/adaptability-the-new-competitive-advantageGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Reis, L. G. (2011). Trends in Studies in Management Accounting from the Perspective of Institutional Theory. In C. Parisi & E. Megliorini (Org.). Contabilidade Gerencial. (1ª Ed. Cap. 15, pp. 331-346). São Paulo: Atlas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Richardson, P., Batt, C., E., & Karlsson, T. 2015. Economic crisis and changes in management accounting and control: a longtitudinal study of internal controls. For presentation at the 8th Conference On Performance Measurement and Management Control, Nice, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogers, K. 2020. Too Much Oil: How a Barrel Came to Be Worth Less Than Nothing. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/20/business/oil-prices.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Scapens, W. R. (1994). Never mind the gap: towards an institutional perspective on management accounting practice. Management Accounting Research, 5, 301-321. Vandenberg,Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Schwartz, MS & Carroll, AB. 2003. 'Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach'. Business Ethics Quarterly. vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 503-30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. SKK Migas. 2020. Transformasi Hulu Migas. Bumi Buletin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Subrata, G., & Thamrin, M. 2015.The Effect of Changes in Organizational Structure On The Increasing of Turn Over Intention.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Suchman, MC. 1995. 'Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches', Academy of Management Review. vol. 20. no. 3, pp. 571-610Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Teo, H, H.,Wei, K.K., & Benbasat, I. 2003. Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Q., 19–49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Vailatti, J. L., Rosa, F., Vecente E F. R. 2017. Institutional Theory Applied To Management Accounting Analysis of Theoretical and Methodological Contribution of International Publication Occurred in The 2006-2015 Period. Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil, ISSN-e 2237-7662, ISSN 1808-3781, Vol. 16, Nº. 47, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Janeiro-Abril), págs. 97-111Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Wahyuni, N., & Triatmanto, B. 2020. The effect of the organizational change on company performance mediated by changes in management accounting practices. Contents lists available at GrowingScience Accounting. Homepage www.GrowingScience.com/ac/ac.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Walton, C. C. 1967. Corporate social responsibilities. United States of America: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Wanderley, C. D. A., Miranda, L. C., Meira, J. M.D., & Cullen, J. 2011. Management Accounting Change: A Model Based on Three Different Theoretical Frameworks. BASE – Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos 8(2):111-121, abril/junho 2011 2011 by Unisinos - doi: 10.4013/base.2011.82.01Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Woodward & Clyde. 1999. Key Opportunities and Risks to New Zealand's Export Trade from Green Market Signals. New Zealand Trade and Development Board, (1999), Final paper, Sustainable Management Fund Project 6117Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Zainal, R. I. 2015. Mandated Corporate Social Responsibility ( CSR ) In Indonesia: Institutional and Stakeholder Perspectives. School of Management College of Business (Issue August 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEME '21: Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
    July 2021
    882 pages
    ISBN:9781450390064
    DOI:10.1145/3481127

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 2 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format