Bambang Leo Handoko
ABSTRACT
The industrial revolution is a process of rapid change in industrial activities previously carried out by humans, replaced by machines. Artificial Intelligence is expected to be able to detect fraud, especially in financial reports, because Artificial Intelligence can analyze complex data in real time and recognize signs of fraud that auditors may have missed. The purpose of this study is to analyze the external auditor acceptance model to adopt Artificial Intelligence as fraud detection. This research uses quantitative research methods. Sources of data are obtained from primary data and secondary data. The primary data is obtaining from questionnaire. Distributing questionnaires in this study was carried out using Google Form. The secondary data obtained from journals, articles, online books. The result of this research, it can be concluded that Performance Expectancy, Facilitating Conditions have a significant positive effect on external auditors' Behavioral Intention in adopting Artificial Intelligence as a fraud detection. The variable Effort Expectancy has a positive but not significant effect on external auditors' Behavioral Intention in adopting Artificial Intelligence as a fraud detection. The variable Social Influence has a negative but not significant effect on external auditors' Behavioral Intention in adopting Artificial Intelligence as a fraud detection.
- ACFE, “Report To The Nations 2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse,” 2020.Google Scholar
- ACFE, “RTTN Asia Pacific Edition 2020,” 2020.Google Scholar
- ACFE Indonesia Chapter, Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. 2019.Google Scholar
- R. Arief, “PERAN AUDIT INTERNAL ATAS KUALITAS PEMERIKSAAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH AUDIT EKSTERNAL PADA SEBUAH PERUSAHAAN Rachmat,” J. Ekon., vol. 7, no. 1, 2016.Google Scholar
- O. Gillath, T. Ai, M. Branicky, S. Keshmiri, R. Davison, and R. Spaulding, “Attachment and trust in artificial intelligence,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 115, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106607.Google ScholarDigital Library
- ICAEW, “Artificial intelligence and the future of accountancy,” 2018.Google Scholar
- J. Raphael, “How Artificial Intelligence Can Boost Audit Quality,” CFO, 2015. https://www.cfo.com/auditing/2015/06/artificial-intelligence-can-boost-audit-quality/ (accessed Apr. 12, 2021).Google Scholar
- F. Persico and H. Sidhu, “How AI will turn auditors into analysts,” Accounting Today, 2017. https://www.accountingtoday.com/opinion/how-ai-will-turn-auditors-into-analysts (accessed Jun. 23, 2021).Google Scholar
- I. Munoko, H. L. Brown-Liburd, and M. Vasarhelyi, “The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 209–234, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04407-1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Choi and K. Lee, “An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Financial Fraud Detection under IoT Environment: A Survey and Implementation,” Secur. Commun. Networks, vol. 2018, 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/5483472.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Imagama.feb, “Artificial Intelligence for Audit: Beneficial or Damaging?,” IMAGAMA FEB UGM, 2017. https://imagama.feb.ugm.ac.id/artificial-intelligence/ (accessed Apr. 12, 2021).Google Scholar
- E. Fatmawati, “Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Untuk Menganalisis Sistem Informasi Perpustakaan,” Iqra’ J. Perpust. Dan Inf., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/iqra/article/view/66.Google Scholar
- T. Handayani and S. Sudiana, “Analisis Penerapan Model Utaut (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) Terhadap Perilaku Pengguna Sistem Informasi (Studi Kasus: Sistem Informasi Akademik Pada Sttnas Yogyakarta),” Angkasa J. Ilm. Bid. Teknol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 165–180, 2015, doi: 10.28989/angkasa.v7i2.159.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, and Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Q., vol. 27, no. 3, p. 425, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.2307/30036540.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. I. Christiono and R. K. M. R. Brahmana, “Analisis Pengaruh Performance Expeciancy Terhadap Behavior Intention pada Online Marketplace,” Agora, vol. 6, no. 2, 2018.Google Scholar
- A. Rahmawaty, “Perempuan Dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Internet Dengan Pendekatan Utaut,” PALASTREN J. Stud. Gend., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 13–42, 2016, doi: 10.21043/palastren.v9i1.1746.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Andreas, “UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A Review and Agenda for Future Research,” The Winners, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 106–114, 2012.Google Scholar
- L. Abdulwahab and Z. M. Dahalin, “A Conceptual Model of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology ( UTAUT ) Modification with Management Effectiveness and Program Effectiveness in Context of Telecentre,” African Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 267–275, 2010.Google Scholar
- R. K. J. Bendi and Sri Andayani, “Analisis Perilaku Penggunaan Sistem Informasi Menggunakan Model UTAUT,” in Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi & Komunikasi Terapan 2013 (Semantik 2013), 2013, vol. 2013, no. November, pp. 277–282.Google Scholar
- S. T. Muntianah, E. S. Astuti, and D. F. Azizah, “Pengaruh Minat Perilaku Terhadap Actual Use Teknologi Informasi Dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Studi kasus pada kegiatan belajar Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Brawijaya Malang),” Profit, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 88–113, 2012.Google Scholar
- K. Rosli, P. Yeow, and E.-G. Siew, “Factors Influencing Audit Technology Acceptance by Audit Firms: A New I-TOE Adoption Framework,” J. Account. Audit. Res. Pract., pp. 1–11, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.5171/2012.876814.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Y. M. Tansil, R. Widuri, A. Gui, and M. M. Ali, “Generalised Audit Software use by external auditor: An empirical examination from UTAUT,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 887–908, 2019.Google Scholar
- B. L. Handoko, S. Ariyanto, and D. L. Warganegara, “Perception of financial auditor on usage of computer assisted audit techniques,” Proc. - 3rd Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Appl. ICCIA 2018, no. April 2019, pp. 235–239, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICCIA.2018.00052.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. S. Mohamed, N. H. M. Muhayyidin, and N. Rozzani, “Auditing and data analytics via computer assisted audit techniques (CAATs): Determinants of adoption intention among auditors in Malaysia,” 2019, doi: 10.1145/3361758.3361773.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Al-hiyari, N. Al Said, and E. Hattab, “FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE USE OF COMPUTER ASSISTED AUDIT TECHNIQUES ( CAATS ) BY INTERNAL AUDITORS IN JORDAN,” Acad. Account. Financ. Stud. J., vol. 23, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28525.23522.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. N. Awanto, Y. T. Ardianto, and D. A. Prasetya, “UTAUT Model Implementation On User Behavior In Use Of Information Technology,” J. Teknol. dan Manaj. Inform., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2020, doi: 10.26905/jtmi.v6i1.4156.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Sohn and O. Kwon, “Technology acceptance theories and factors influencing artificial Intelligence-based intelligent products,” Telemat. Informatics, vol. 47, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2019.101324.Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Cao, Y. Duan, J. S. Edwards, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Understanding managers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions towards using artificial intelligence for organizational decision-making,” Technovation, Vol. 106, vol. 106, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102312.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Martins, T. Oliveira, and A. Popovič, “Understanding the internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 34, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.06.002.Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Ferri, R. Spanò, G. Ginesti, and G. Theodosopoulos, “Ascertaining auditors’ intentions to use blockchain technology: evidence from the Big 4 accountancy firms in Italy,” Meditari Account. Res., 2020, doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-03-2020-0829.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Bierstaker, D. Janvrin, and D. J. Lowe, “What factors influence auditors’ use of computer-assisted audit techniques?,” Adv. Account., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.adiac.2013.12.005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. N. Normahazan, I. S. Mohamed, and N. Rozzani, “Drivers Contributing to the Implementation of Generalized Audit Software (GAS) within Audit Firms in Malaysia,” Bus. Econ. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 341, 2020, doi: 10.5296/ber.v10i2.16862.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Duli, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif: Beberapa Konsep Dasar Untuk Penulisan Skripsi & Analisis Data dengan SPSS. 2019.Google Scholar
- A. Febriansyah and V. Herviani, “Tinjauan Atas Proses Penyusunan Laporan Keuangan Pada Young Enterpreneur Academy Indonesia Bandung,” J. Ris. Akunt., vol. 8, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.34010/jra.v8i2.525.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. I. Pratiwi, “Penggunaan Media Video Call dalam Teknologi Komunikasi,” J. Ilm. Din. Sos., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 202–224, 2017.Google Scholar
- J. T. Roscoe, Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston, 1975.Google Scholar
- G. Anuraga, E. Sulistiyawan, and S. Munadhiroh, “Structural Equation Modeling - PLS Untuk Pemodelan IPKM Jawa Timur,” pp. 257–263, 2017.Google Scholar
- R. Heale and A. Twycross, “Validity and reliability in quantitative studies,” Evid. Based. Nurs., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 66–67, 2015, doi: 10.1136/eb-2015-102129.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. W. Chin, “The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Modeling,” Mod. Methods Bus. Res., 1998.Google Scholar
- W. Abdillah and J. Hartono, Konsep Aplikasi PLS (Partial Least Square) untuk penelitian empiris, Edisi Pert. Yogyakarta: BPFE, 2014.Google Scholar
- D. Muijs, Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. 2012.Google Scholar
- N. Golafshani, “Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research,” Qual. Rep., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 597–606, 2015, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. H. Md Ghazali, “A Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Evaluate the School-Based Assessment System: A Pilot Study,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 148, 2016, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v5i2.4533.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
UTAUT Model in Predicting Auditor Intention in Adopting CAATs
ICEME '21: Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on E-business, Management and EconomicsThis era of the industrial revolution 4.0 affects all fields including accounting itself. So that all areas affected by the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 are both positive and negative. The industrial revolution 4.0 also has an impact on the ...
Analysis of Financial Technology User Acceptance Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Method
AbstractBehavioral Intention and Use Behavior can be interpreted as acceptance and utilization for users when using a system and how users can accept and use a system. The focus of Behavioral Intention and Use Behavior in this study is financial ...
User Behavior Analysis in Academic Information System Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)
ICIEB '18: Proceedings of the 2018 1st International Conference on Internet and e-BusinessThis study discusses the behavior of users of academic information systems that exist in the university Abdurrab Pekanbaru using UTAUT model. UTAUT is a combination of eight user acceptance of technology models that have been developed previously. UTAUT ...
Comments