skip to main content
10.1145/3481127.3481153acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Identification of AKHLAK Values-Based Management’s Determinant in Indonesia State-Owned Enterprises Ecosystem

Published:02 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper is written to build a theory a set of core values namely AKHLAK (abbreviation from Bahasa Indonesia’s words: Amanah/ Trustworthy, Kompeten/ Competent, Harmonis/ Harmonious, Loyal, Adaptif/ Adaptive, Kolaboratif/ Collaborative) initiated by State-owned Enterprises Ministry Republic of Indonesia implemented as the only organisation’s core values for all Indonesia state-owned enterprises. AKHLAK core values expected to be integrated with state-owned enterprises’ management system and positioned as an independent factor which believed to boost business performance. Values has been known as abstract and dynamic concept that draws intriguing discussion topic in the field of management studies especially when it is related to business performance, but there is yet research to map the determinants of values-based management, in addition with empirical studies in Indonesia especially in state-owned enterprises’ ecosystem.

References

  1. Sharon Arieli, Lilach Sagiv, and Sonia Roccas. 2020. Values at work: The impact of personal values in organisations. Applied Psychology 69, 2 (2020), 230–275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Marne L Arthaud-Day, Joseph C Rode, and William H Turnley. 2012. Direct and contextual effects of individual values on organizational citizenship behavior in teams.Journal of Applied Psychology 97, 4 (2012), 792.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stephen J Ball. 2009. Academies in context: Politics, business and philanthropy and heterarchical governance. Management in Education 23, 3 (2009), 100–103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Rob Bauer, Nadja Guenster, and Roger Otten. 2004. Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe: The effect on stock returns, firm value and performance. Journal of Asset management 5, 2 (2004), 91–104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. B Ariel Blair and Michelle C Bligh. 2018. Looking for leadership in all the wrong places: The impact of culture on proactive followership and follower dissent. Journal of Social issues 74, 1 (2018), 129–143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Claudiu Bocean, Catalin M Barbu, 2007. Corporate governance and firm performance. Management and Marketing Journal 5, 1 (2007), 125–131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Aaron A Buchko. 2007. The effect of leadership on values-based management. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 33, 4 (2007), 425–452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Aaron A Buchko and Kathleen J Buchko. 2012. Values-Based Management or The Performance-Values Matrix: Was Jack Welch Right?Journal of Business & Leadership: Research, Practice, and Teaching (2005-2012) 8, 1(2012), 69–83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Abdullah Can and Mert Aktaş. 2012. Cultural values and followership style preferences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 41 (2012), 84–91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Alan R Cannon and Caron H St John. 2007. Measuring environmental complexity: a theoretical and empirical assessment. Organizational Research Methods 10, 2 (2007), 296–321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Suzanne M Carter and Charles R Greer. 2013. Strategic leadership: Values, styles, and organizational performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 20, 4 (2013), 375–393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Shitansku Kumar Chakraborty 2001. Management and Ethics Omnibus: Management by Values, Ethics in Management, Values and Ethics for Organizations. OUP Catalogue 33, 4 (2001), 425–452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kathy Charmaz. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. sage, n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. M. Christensen and D. M. Sundahl. 2001. The Process of Building Theory.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Aaron Cohen and Danny Keren. 2008. Individual values and social exchange variables: Examining their relationship to and mutual effect on in-role performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Group & Organization Management 33, 4 (2008), 425–452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jim Collins. 2009. Good to Great-(Why some companies make the leap and others don’t).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. David W Crain. 2009. Only the right people are strategic assets of the firm. Strategy & Leadership n/a, n/a (2009), n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. John W Creswell and Vicki L Plano Clark. 2017. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications, n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pepper D Culpepper. 2010. Quiet politics and business power: Corporate control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge University Press, n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Simon L Dolan and Yochanan Altman. 2012. Managing by values: The leadership spirituality connection. People & Strategy 35, 4 (2012), 20–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Simon L Dolan and Salvador Garcia. 2000. Managing by values in the next milenium: Cultural redesign for strategic organizational change. Available at SSRN 237628 n/a, n/a (2000), n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Shimon L Dolan and Salvador Garcia. 2002. Managing by values: Cultural redesign for strategic organizational change at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Journal of management development n/a, n/a (2002), n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Simon L Dolan and Bonnie A Richley. 2006. Management by values (MBV): a new philosophy for a new economic order. Handbook of business strategy n/a, n/a (2006), n/a.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Kathleen M Eisenhardt and Melissa E Graebner. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal 50, 1 (2007), 25–32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Johan Frishammar. 2006. Organizational environment revisited: a conceptual review and integration. International studies of management & organization 36, 3(2006), 22–49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hillary Haley and Jim Sidanius. 2005. Person-organization congruence and the maintenance of group-based social hierarchy: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 8, 2 (2005), 187–203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Bruce Hoag and Cary L Cooper. 2006. Managing value-based organizations: it’s not what you think. Edward Elgar Publishing, n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Krista Jaakson. 2010. Management by values: are some values better than others?Journal of management Development n/a, n/a (2010), n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Shannon Kerwin, Joanne MacLean, and Dina Bell-Laroche. 2014. The value of managing by values: a Canadian sport organization case study. Journal of Applied Sport Management 6, 4 (2014), 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Joann Keyton and Stephenson J Beck. 2008. Team attributes, processes, and values: a pedagogical framework. Business Communication Quarterly 71, 4 (2008), 488–504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Siew Kim Jean Lee and Kelvin Yu. 2004. Corporate culture and organizational performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology 19, 4 (2004), 340–359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Katherine J Klein, Andrew P Knight, Jonathan C Ziegert, Beng Chong Lim, and Jessica L Saltz. 2011. When team members’ values differ: The moderating role of team leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 114, 1(2011), 25–36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Kazimierz Krzakiewicz. 2012. Management by Values-a strategic dimension. Management 16, 2 (2012), 7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Gary P Latham and Edwin A Locke. 2007. New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. European Psychologist 12, 4 (2007), 290–300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Allan Chang Aik Leng and Shazali Abu Mansor. 2005. Can good corporate governance practices contribute to firms’ financial performance?–evidence from Malaysian companies. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1, 4 (2005), 350–362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Robert G Lord and Douglas J Brown. 2001. Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts. The Leadership Quarterly 12, 2 (2001), 133–152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Eva Peguero, Anna Berenguera, Enriqueta Pujol-Ribera, Begoña Roman, Carmen M Prieto, and Núria Terribas. 2015. The workers opinions have a value in the Code of Ethics: Analysis of the contributions of workers in virtual Forum Catalan Institute of Health. BMC medical ethics 16, 1 (2015), 1–18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Robert F Russell. 2001. The role of values in servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal n/a, n/a(2001), n/a.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. John Schaubroeck, Simon SK Lam, and Sandra E Cha. 2007. Embracing transformational leadership: team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance.Journal of applied psychology 92, 4 (2007), 1020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Edgar H Schein. 2010. Organizational culture and leadership. Vol. 2. John Wiley & Sons, n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ben Ross Schneider 2004. Business politics and the state in twentieth-century Latin America. Cambridge University Press, n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Shalom H Schwartz. 2012. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture 2, 1 (2012), 2307–0919.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Todd Shank, Ronald Paul Hill, and John Stang. 2013. Do investors benefit from good corporate governance?Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society n/a, n/a(2013), n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Jason D Shaw, Michelle K Duffy, and Eric M Stark. 2000. Interdependence and preference for group work: Main and congruence effects on the satisfaction and performance of group members. Journal of Management 26, 2 (2000), 259–279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Elizabeth L Shoenfelt. 2011. “Values Added” teambuilding: a process to ensure understanding, acceptance, and commitment to team values. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action 1, 3 (2011), 150–160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Angela Thody. 2000. Followership or followersheep? An exploration of the values of non-leaders. Management in Education 14, 2 (2000), 15–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Johan Van Rekom, Cees BM Van Riel, and Berend Wierenga. 2006. A methodology for assessing organizational core values. Journal of management studies 43, 2 (2006), 175–201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Ruth Wageman and Frederick M Gordon. 2005. As the twig is bent: How group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups. Organization Science 16, 6 (2005), 687–700.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Ken Wilber. 2001. A theory of everything: An integral vision for business, politics, science and spirituality. Shambhala publications, n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Robert K Yin. 2009. Yin, RK (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. The Canadian Journal of Action Research 14, 1(2009), 69–71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. LIU Zhen. 2012. Management by values: a case study. International Business and Management 4, 2 (2012), 75–91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEME '21: Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
    July 2021
    882 pages
    ISBN:9781450390064
    DOI:10.1145/3481127

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 2 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format