skip to main content
10.1145/3481127.3481163acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Risk and Loss Preference Change Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Published:02 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

It is long believed that people's preferences are relatively stable over time. However, this study utilized a survey to directly elicit people's preference after experiencing COVID-19 pandemic. The study finds that those who have been heavily impacted by the pandemic, such as experiencing negative monetary effects, become more risk-averse when facing an uncertain gain while also become more risk-loving when encountering an uncertain loss. A model was used to demonstrate that this finding is inconsistent with the classic utility function with single risk parameter. However, it is consistent with the behavioral model of risk-aversion across gain and loss domains. Furthermore, other findings indicate that people becoming less loss-averse over the months of the pandemic yet the data also shows the participants becoming less willing to take financial and health risks. It was found that several demographic variables closely relate to people's risk-preference and loss-aversion. This finding offers new implications and future research possibilities as it points out people's preference might not be as stable as usually assumed in classical models.

References

  1. Andersen, Steffen, “Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences.” Econometrica, vol. 76, no. 3, 2008, pp. 583–618., doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00848.x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bonsang, Eric, and Thomas Dohmen. “Risk Attitude and Cognitive Aging.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 112, 2015, pp. 112–126., doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.01.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Callen, Michael, “Violence and Risk Preference: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan.” American Economic Review, vol. 104, no. 1, 2014, pp. 123–148., doi:10.1257/aer.104.1.123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cassar, Alessandra, “Trust, Risk, and Time Preferences After a Natural Disaster: Experimental Evidence from Thailand.” World Development, vol. 94, 2017, pp. 90–105., doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Chapman, Jonathan, “Loss Attitudes in the U.S. Population: Evidence from Dynamically Optimized Sequential Experimentation (DOSE).” 2018, doi:10.3386/w25072.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Eckel, Catherine C., and Philip J. Grossman. “Sex Differences and Statistical Stereotyping in Attitudes toward Financial Risk.” Evolution and Human Behavior, vol. 23, no. 4, 2002, pp. 281–295., doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(02)00097-1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Goebel, Jan, “How Natural Disasters Can Affect Environmental Concerns, Risk Aversion, and Even Politics: Evidence from Fukushima and Three European Countries.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015, doi:10.2139/ssrn.2623499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. “Prospect Theory. An Analysis of Decision Making Under Risk.” 1977, doi:10.21236/ada045771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kőszegi, Botond, and Matthew Rabin. “Reference-Dependent Risk Attitudes.” American Economic Review, vol. 97, no. 4, 2007, pp. 1047–1073., doi:10.1257/aer.97.4.1047.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Said, Farah, “Risk Taking and Risk Learning after a Rare Event: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Pakistan.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 118, 2015, pp. 167–183., doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.03.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. T.j., Dohmen, “Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants and Behavioral Consequences.” 2009, doi:10.26481/umaror.2009006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Taylor, Chloe. Coronavirus Could Create 'a Generation of Supersavers' and Reshape the Economy. 3 Apr. 2020, www.cnbc.com/2020/04/03/coronavirus-may-create-a-generation-of-supersavers-who-reshape-economy.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEME '21: Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
    July 2021
    882 pages
    ISBN:9781450390064
    DOI:10.1145/3481127

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 2 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format