skip to main content
10.1145/3481127.3481220acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on Coupling and Coordinated Development of Energy, Economy and Environment (3E) in Chongqing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to promote the coordinated development of energy, economy and environment in Chongqing, this paper uses the coupling coordination model to measure and evaluate the coupling coordination degree and dynamic evolution of energy, economy and environment in Chongqing from 2000 to 2019. The results show that: the development level index of energy subsystem, economic subsystem, environmental subsystem and 3E system in Chongqing show an upward trend, from 0.37, 0.02, 0.13 and 0.17 in 2000 to 0.69, 0.72, 0.80 and 0.74 in 2019, according to the average score of each subsystem, the environmental system ranked first, followed by the energy system, and the economic system scored the lowest. From 2000 to 2011, the coupling degree of 3E system in Chongqing experienced a large fluctuation, it gradually recovered and maintained at a high level after 2012, and was in the primary coordination stage as a whole; the coupling coordination degree of 3E system in Chongqing showed a jump trend, and was in the primary coordination stage as a whole; the dynamic coupling relationship of 3E system in Chongqing was in a coordinated development stage. Based on the above research conclusions, this paper puts forward suggestions to promote the coordinated development of 3E system in Chongqing.

References

  1. Robson AJ. 1980. Costly Innovation and Natural Resources. International economic review (Philadelphia), 21,1(Jan.1980):17-30. DOI=https://doi.org/10.2307/2526237Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Romer PM. 1990.Endogenous Technological Change. The Journal of political economy, 98,5 (May.1990): S71-S102.10.1086/261725Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bovenberg AL, Smulders SA.1996. Transitional Impacts of Environmental Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model. International economic review (Philadelphia), 37,4(Apr.1996):861-893. DOI=10.2307/2527315Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gottinger H W. 1998. Greenhouse Gas Economics and Computable General Equilibrium. Journal of Policy Modeling,2,5(May.1998):537-580. DOI=10.1016/S0161-8938(97)00074-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Allan G, Hanley N, McGregor P, Swales K, Turner K. 2007.The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom. Energy economics,29,4(Apr.2007):779-798. DOI=10.1016/j.eneco.2006.12.006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lenzen M, Dey C J. 2002.Economic, Energy and Greenhouse Emissions Impacts of some Consumer Choice, Technology and Government Outlay Options. Energy Economics,24,4(Apr.2002):377-403. DOI=10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00007-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Oliveira C, Antunes C H.2011. A multi-objective multisectoral economy-energy-environment model: Application to Portugal.Energy,36,5(May,2011): 2856-2866.DOI=10.1016/j.energy.2011.02.028Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Barker T, Anger A, Dessens O, 2010. Integrated Modeling of Climate Control and Air Pollution: Methodology and Results from One-Way Coupling of an Energy–Environment- Economy and Atmospheric Chemistry Model in Decarbonizing Scenarios for Mexico to 2050. Environmental Science & Technology,13,8(Aug.2010):661-670.DOI=10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Carvalho ALd, Antunes CH, Freire F, Henriques CO. 2015.A hybrid input–output multi-objective model to assess economic–energy–environment trade-offs in Brazil. Energy (Oxford),82,3(Mar.2015):769-785. DOI=10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.089Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Akhtar M K, Wibe J, Simonovic S P, 2015.Integrated Assessment Model of Society-Biosphere-Climate-Economy-Energy System. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82,3(Mar.2015):769-785. DOI=10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.089Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Guan D, Gao W, Su W, Li H, Hokao K. 2011.Modeling and dynamic assessment of urban economy–resource–environment system with a coupled system dynamics – geographic information system model. Ecological indicators,11,5(May.2011):1333-1344. DOI=10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Glibert A. 1996. Criteria for Sustainability in Development of Indicators for Sustainable Development. Chemosphere,33,9(Sep.1996):1739-1748. DOI=10.1016/0045-6535(96)00190-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Stockhammer E, Hochreiter H, Obermayr B, 1997. The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) as an Alternative to GDP in Measuring Economic Welfare* The Results of the Austrian (revised) ISEW Calculation 1955-1992, Ecological Economics,21,l(Jan.1997):16-20. DOI=10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00088-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Haseeb, M., Kot, S., Hussain, H., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Impact of Economic Growth, Environmental Pollution, and Energy Consumption on Health Expenditure and R and D Expenditure of ASEAN Countries. Energies, 12(19), 3598. DOI: 10.3390/en12193598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hussain, H., Haseeb, M., Tvaronavičienė, M., Mihardjo, L., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The Causal Connection of Natural Resources and Globalization with Energy Consumption in Top Asian Countries: Evidence from a Nonparametric Causality-in-Quantile Approach. Energies, 13(9), 2273. DOI: 10.3390/en13092273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Aziz, N., Mihardjo, L., Sharif, A., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The Role of Tourism and Renewable Energy in Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve in the BRICS Countries: Fresh Evidence from Methods of Moments Quantile Regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 39427-39441. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10011-y.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Yu yue-feng; Hu jian-yi; Zhang shu-rong;Luo yong-hao.2008. Study on Shanghai Energy System MARKAL Model and Scenario Analysis. Journal Of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 42,03(Mar.2008):360-364. DOI=10.3321/j.issn:1006-2467.2008.03.002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. He xu-bo.2013. Forecasting Renewable Energy Development of Shaanxi Province under Subsidy Policies and Emission Limit——A Scenario Analysis Based on MARKAL. Jinan Journal(Philosophy & Social Science Edition, 35,12(Dec.2013):1-8. DOI=10.3969/j.issn.1000-5072.2013.12.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhao fang.2009. Empirical study on the coordinated development of China's energy-economy-environment (3E). Economist,12(Dec.2009):35-41. DOI=CNKI:SUN:JJXJ.0.2009-12-006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Xing qingqing, Guo cunzhi.2014. Empirical Analysis on Coordination Degree of China's Energy, Economic and Environment)3E(. Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, 02(Feb.2014):15-20. DOI=CNKI: SUN: NJJJ.0.2014-02-003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang zhen-shuang, Zhao ning, Su hao-lin.2015. Research on Coupling Coordinative Degree of Energy-economy-environment——A Case Study of Cement Industry in Shandong Province. Soft Science, 29,02(Feb.2015):33-36. DOI=10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2015.02.08Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lu jin;Chang hong;Wang yun-bo.2017. Dynamic evolution of provincial energy economy and environment coupling in China's regions. China Population Resources and Environment, 27,02(Feb.2017):60-68. DOI=10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2017.02.010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Li li;Hong xue-fei;Wang Jun;Xie Charlene.2018. Coupling and Coordinated Development of Economy-Energy-Environment System Based on PLS-ESDA. Soft Science, 32,11(Nov.2018):44-48. DOI=10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2018.11.10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Gai mei;Zhang fuxiang.2018. Regional Carbon Emissions, Economic Development and Environmental Protection Coupling in Liaoning Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 38,05(May.2018):764-772. DOI=10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.05.014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Luo Fuzhou;Zhang nuonan.2020. Analysis on spatio-temporal coupling coordination of China's inter-provincial energy use-economic development environmental protection system. Environmental Pollution & Control,42,7(Jul.2020): 884-889. DOI=10.15985/j.cnki.1001-3865.2020.07.016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Cao chenglong;Yin yitong;Lin gang;Huang shiqi;Gao ming.2020. The coupling coordination characteristics of regional energy-economy-environment system——A case study of Ningbo cit. Science & Technology Review, 38,11(Nov.2020):70-77. DOI=10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.11.008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Liao chongbin. 1999.Quantitaitve judgement and classification system for coordinated development of environment and economy—A case study of the city group in the Pearl river delta. Tropical Geography,2(Feb.1999):171-177. DOI= 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.000443Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhao dandan,Hu yechui.2017. Analysis of coordinative and harmonious degree between urban land use efficiency and urbanization—A case study on 285 cities at prefecture level or above. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,24,1(Jan.2017):291-304. DOI= 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2017.01.038Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rudel T K, Coomes O T, Moran E, 2005. Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change Part A,15,1(Jan.2005):23-31. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEME '21: Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
    July 2021
    882 pages
    ISBN:9781450390064
    DOI:10.1145/3481127

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 2 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format