ABSTRACT
In order to promote the coordinated development of energy, economy and environment in Chongqing, this paper uses the coupling coordination model to measure and evaluate the coupling coordination degree and dynamic evolution of energy, economy and environment in Chongqing from 2000 to 2019. The results show that: the development level index of energy subsystem, economic subsystem, environmental subsystem and 3E system in Chongqing show an upward trend, from 0.37, 0.02, 0.13 and 0.17 in 2000 to 0.69, 0.72, 0.80 and 0.74 in 2019, according to the average score of each subsystem, the environmental system ranked first, followed by the energy system, and the economic system scored the lowest. From 2000 to 2011, the coupling degree of 3E system in Chongqing experienced a large fluctuation, it gradually recovered and maintained at a high level after 2012, and was in the primary coordination stage as a whole; the coupling coordination degree of 3E system in Chongqing showed a jump trend, and was in the primary coordination stage as a whole; the dynamic coupling relationship of 3E system in Chongqing was in a coordinated development stage. Based on the above research conclusions, this paper puts forward suggestions to promote the coordinated development of 3E system in Chongqing.
- Robson AJ. 1980. Costly Innovation and Natural Resources. International economic review (Philadelphia), 21,1(Jan.1980):17-30. DOI=https://doi.org/10.2307/2526237Google ScholarCross Ref
- Romer PM. 1990.Endogenous Technological Change. The Journal of political economy, 98,5 (May.1990): S71-S102.10.1086/261725Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bovenberg AL, Smulders SA.1996. Transitional Impacts of Environmental Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model. International economic review (Philadelphia), 37,4(Apr.1996):861-893. DOI=10.2307/2527315Google Scholar
- Gottinger H W. 1998. Greenhouse Gas Economics and Computable General Equilibrium. Journal of Policy Modeling,2,5(May.1998):537-580. DOI=10.1016/S0161-8938(97)00074-4Google ScholarCross Ref
- Allan G, Hanley N, McGregor P, Swales K, Turner K. 2007.The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom. Energy economics,29,4(Apr.2007):779-798. DOI=10.1016/j.eneco.2006.12.006Google Scholar
- Lenzen M, Dey C J. 2002.Economic, Energy and Greenhouse Emissions Impacts of some Consumer Choice, Technology and Government Outlay Options. Energy Economics,24,4(Apr.2002):377-403. DOI=10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00007-5Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oliveira C, Antunes C H.2011. A multi-objective multisectoral economy-energy-environment model: Application to Portugal.Energy,36,5(May,2011): 2856-2866.DOI=10.1016/j.energy.2011.02.028Google Scholar
- Barker T, Anger A, Dessens O, 2010. Integrated Modeling of Climate Control and Air Pollution: Methodology and Results from One-Way Coupling of an Energy–Environment- Economy and Atmospheric Chemistry Model in Decarbonizing Scenarios for Mexico to 2050. Environmental Science & Technology,13,8(Aug.2010):661-670.DOI=10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.008Google Scholar
- Carvalho ALd, Antunes CH, Freire F, Henriques CO. 2015.A hybrid input–output multi-objective model to assess economic–energy–environment trade-offs in Brazil. Energy (Oxford),82,3(Mar.2015):769-785. DOI=10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.089Google Scholar
- Akhtar M K, Wibe J, Simonovic S P, 2015.Integrated Assessment Model of Society-Biosphere-Climate-Economy-Energy System. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82,3(Mar.2015):769-785. DOI=10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.089Google Scholar
- Guan D, Gao W, Su W, Li H, Hokao K. 2011.Modeling and dynamic assessment of urban economy–resource–environment system with a coupled system dynamics – geographic information system model. Ecological indicators,11,5(May.2011):1333-1344. DOI=10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.007Google Scholar
- Glibert A. 1996. Criteria for Sustainability in Development of Indicators for Sustainable Development. Chemosphere,33,9(Sep.1996):1739-1748. DOI=10.1016/0045-6535(96)00190-7Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stockhammer E, Hochreiter H, Obermayr B, 1997. The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) as an Alternative to GDP in Measuring Economic Welfare* The Results of the Austrian (revised) ISEW Calculation 1955-1992, Ecological Economics,21,l(Jan.1997):16-20. DOI=10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00088-2Google Scholar
- Haseeb, M., Kot, S., Hussain, H., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Impact of Economic Growth, Environmental Pollution, and Energy Consumption on Health Expenditure and R and D Expenditure of ASEAN Countries. Energies, 12(19), 3598. DOI: 10.3390/en12193598.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hussain, H., Haseeb, M., Tvaronavičienė, M., Mihardjo, L., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The Causal Connection of Natural Resources and Globalization with Energy Consumption in Top Asian Countries: Evidence from a Nonparametric Causality-in-Quantile Approach. Energies, 13(9), 2273. DOI: 10.3390/en13092273.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aziz, N., Mihardjo, L., Sharif, A., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The Role of Tourism and Renewable Energy in Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve in the BRICS Countries: Fresh Evidence from Methods of Moments Quantile Regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 39427-39441. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10011-y.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yu yue-feng; Hu jian-yi; Zhang shu-rong;Luo yong-hao.2008. Study on Shanghai Energy System MARKAL Model and Scenario Analysis. Journal Of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 42,03(Mar.2008):360-364. DOI=10.3321/j.issn:1006-2467.2008.03.002Google Scholar
- He xu-bo.2013. Forecasting Renewable Energy Development of Shaanxi Province under Subsidy Policies and Emission Limit——A Scenario Analysis Based on MARKAL. Jinan Journal(Philosophy & Social Science Edition, 35,12(Dec.2013):1-8. DOI=10.3969/j.issn.1000-5072.2013.12.001Google Scholar
- Zhao fang.2009. Empirical study on the coordinated development of China's energy-economy-environment (3E). Economist,12(Dec.2009):35-41. DOI=CNKI:SUN:JJXJ.0.2009-12-006Google Scholar
- Xing qingqing, Guo cunzhi.2014. Empirical Analysis on Coordination Degree of China's Energy, Economic and Environment)3E(. Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, 02(Feb.2014):15-20. DOI=CNKI: SUN: NJJJ.0.2014-02-003Google Scholar
- Wang zhen-shuang, Zhao ning, Su hao-lin.2015. Research on Coupling Coordinative Degree of Energy-economy-environment——A Case Study of Cement Industry in Shandong Province. Soft Science, 29,02(Feb.2015):33-36. DOI=10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2015.02.08Google Scholar
- Lu jin;Chang hong;Wang yun-bo.2017. Dynamic evolution of provincial energy economy and environment coupling in China's regions. China Population Resources and Environment, 27,02(Feb.2017):60-68. DOI=10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2017.02.010Google Scholar
- Li li;Hong xue-fei;Wang Jun;Xie Charlene.2018. Coupling and Coordinated Development of Economy-Energy-Environment System Based on PLS-ESDA. Soft Science, 32,11(Nov.2018):44-48. DOI=10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2018.11.10Google Scholar
- Gai mei;Zhang fuxiang.2018. Regional Carbon Emissions, Economic Development and Environmental Protection Coupling in Liaoning Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 38,05(May.2018):764-772. DOI=10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.05.014Google Scholar
- Luo Fuzhou;Zhang nuonan.2020. Analysis on spatio-temporal coupling coordination of China's inter-provincial energy use-economic development environmental protection system. Environmental Pollution & Control,42,7(Jul.2020): 884-889. DOI=10.15985/j.cnki.1001-3865.2020.07.016Google Scholar
- Cao chenglong;Yin yitong;Lin gang;Huang shiqi;Gao ming.2020. The coupling coordination characteristics of regional energy-economy-environment system——A case study of Ningbo cit. Science & Technology Review, 38,11(Nov.2020):70-77. DOI=10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2020.11.008Google Scholar
- Liao chongbin. 1999.Quantitaitve judgement and classification system for coordinated development of environment and economy—A case study of the city group in the Pearl river delta. Tropical Geography,2(Feb.1999):171-177. DOI= 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.000443Google Scholar
- Zhao dandan,Hu yechui.2017. Analysis of coordinative and harmonious degree between urban land use efficiency and urbanization—A case study on 285 cities at prefecture level or above. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,24,1(Jan.2017):291-304. DOI= 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2017.01.038Google Scholar
- Rudel T K, Coomes O T, Moran E, 2005. Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change Part A,15,1(Jan.2005):23-31. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.001Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Coupling analysis of economy and ecological environment in developed areas
PCCNT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Power, Communication, Computing and Networking TechnologiesBased on the relevant data of economy and ecological environment in developed areas, this paper constructs an evaluation index system, uses entropy method to calculate the weight of each index, and obtains the comprehensive score of economic development ...
Analyzing the Coupling Degree of Coordinated Development between Ecological Environment and Regional Economy in Underdeveloped Areas
Accelerating economic development necessitates the rapid consumption of more ecological environmental resources. Excessive consumption of ecological environmental resources will seriously damage the overall coordination between the ecological environment ...
Study on the Coupling and Coordination Relationship between Farmers' Livelihood and Ecological Environment in Ethnic Areas of Southeast Chongqing
ICEME '20: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-business, Management and EconomicsIn order to promote the coordinated development of farmers' livelihood and ecological environment in southeast ethnic areas of Chongqing, this paper uses the coupling and coordination models to calculate and evaluate the coupling and coordination ...
Comments