skip to main content
10.1145/3481127.3481260acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Weight Loss Analysis based on Prospect Theory

Published:02 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Scholars have recently discovered an interesting subject called reference point. It stresses the significance of people's expectations on their behavior. This concept has been widely discussed in the financial and labor markets. In this paper, we investigate the weight loss data from people who wanted to bet on themselves on the internet. Particularly, we are focusing on the situation where people are aiming to reach a relatively long-term goal without compulsion. By using a regression analysis on the weight loss data, we analyze how people react when they are above the reference points with considerations of other factors that may affect the weight loss result. Finally, the result supports the hypothesis well that the participants lose weight follow a zig-zag path, which indicates there is a reference baseline in their mental account to weigh gain and loss. It could help the government and business to design appropriate policy that can boost labor productivity and output. Therefore, some applications of this phenomenon have also been given for the labor market to increase employees’ productivity.

References

  1. Allen E J, Dechow P M, Pope D G, Reference-dependent preferences: Evidence from marathon runners[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(6): 1657-1672.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Batson C D, Thompson E R, Chen H. Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 83(2): 330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M, Weber M, Welfens F. Reference-point formation and updating[J]. Management Science, 2011, 57(3): 506-519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cascio J, Plant E A. Prospective moral licensing: Does anticipating doing good later allow you to be bad now?[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2015, 56: 110-116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Camerer C, Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112(2): 407-441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Christopher N. Ochner, Dulce M. Barrios, Clement D. Lee, F. Xavier Pi-Sunyer, Biological mechanisms that promote weight regain following weight loss in obese humans, Physiology & Behavior, Volume 120, 2013 , Pages 106-113Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chang Y Y C, Chiou W B. Taking weight-loss supplements may elicit liberation from dietary control. A laboratory experiment[J]. Appetite, 2014, 72: 8-12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. DellaVigna S, Lindner A, Reizer B, Reference-dependent job search: Evidence from Hungary[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2017, 132(4): 1969-2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Freedman J L, Fraser S C. Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1966, 4(2): 195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kahneman D. Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 1992, 51(2): 296-312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kőszegi B, Rabin M. Reference-dependent risk attitudes[J]. American Economic Review, 2007, 97(4): 1047-1073.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Locke E A, Latham G P. A theory of goal setting & task performance[M]. Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Locke E A, Latham G P. Breaking the rules: a historical overview of goal-setting theory[M]//Advances in motivation science. Elsevier, 2015, 2: 99-126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Locke E A, Latham G P. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey[J]. American psychologist, 2002, 57(9): 705.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Locke E A, Latham G P. New directions in goal-setting theory[J]. Current directions in psychological science, 2006, 15(5): 265-268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Latham G P, Piccolo R F. The effect of context‐specific versus nonspecific subconscious goals on employee performance[J]. Human Resource Management, 2012, 51(4): 511-523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Merritt A C, Effron D A, Monin B. Moral self‐licensing: When being good frees us to be bad[J]. Social and personality psychology compass, 2010, 4(5): 344-357.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Munro A, Sugden R. On the theory of reference-dependent preferences[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2003, 50(4): 407-428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mullen E, Monin B. Consistency versus licensing effects of past moral behavior[J]. Annual review of psychology, 2016, 67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pope D G, Schweitzer M E. Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes[J]. American Economic Review, 2011, 101(1): 129-57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Rena R Wing, Suzanne Phelan, Long-term weight loss maintenance, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Volume 82, Issue 1, July 2005, Pages 222S–225SGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sackett A M, Wu G, White R J, Harnessing optimism: How eliciting goals improves performance[J]. Available at SSRN 2544020, 2014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tomiyama A J, Mann T, Vinas D, Low calorie dieting increases cortisol[J]. Psychosomatic medicine, 2010, 72(4): 357.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model[J]. The quarterly journal of economics, 1991, 106(4): 1039-1061.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Wing R R, Hill J O. Successful weight loss maintenance[J]. Annual review of nutrition, 2001, 21(1): 323-341.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEME '21: Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
    July 2021
    882 pages
    ISBN:9781450390064
    DOI:10.1145/3481127

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 2 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format