skip to main content
10.1145/3481549.3481573acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvinciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Software Galaxies: Displaying Coding Activitiesusing a Galaxy Metaphor

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Software visualization uses metaphors to depict software system and software development data that usually has no inherent gestalt. The choice of a fitting metaphor for visual display is researched broadly, but deriving a layout based on similarity is still challenging. We present a novel approach to 3D software visualization called Software Galaxy. Our layout is based on applying Latent Dirichlet Allocation on source code documents. We utilize a metaphor inspired from astronomy for depicting software metrics for single documents and clusters of documents. Our first experiments indicate that a 3D visualization capturing semantic relatedness can be beneficial for standard program comprehension tasks.

References

  1. Daniel Atzberger, Tim Cech, Merlin de la Haye, Maximilian Söchting, Willy Scheibel, Daniel Limberger, and Jürgen Döllner. 2021. Software Forest: A Visualization of Semantic Similarities in Source Code using a Tree Metaphor. In Proc. 16th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications – Volume 3(IVAPP ’21). SciTePress, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010267601120122Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (2003), 993–1022. https://doi.org/10.5555/944919.944937Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andrew H. Caudwell. 2010. Gource: Visualizing Software Version Control History. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference Companion on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications Companion(OOPSLA ’10). ACM, 73–74. https://doi.org/10.1145/1869542.1869554Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tse-Hsun Chen, Stephen W. Thomas, and Ahmed E. Hassan. 2016. A survey on the use of topic models when mining software repositories. Empirical Software Engineering 21, 5 (2016), 1843–1919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-015-9402-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Michael A. A. Cox and Trevor F. Cox. 2008. Multidimensional scaling. In Handbook of Data Visualization. Springer, 315–347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tobias Knöschke. 2020. Design and Implementation of 3D Visualizations for Topic Maps and their Application in Software Analytics. Master’s thesis. Hasso Plattner Institute, Digital Engineering Faculty, University of Potsdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Adrian Kuhn, Peter Loretan, and Oscar Nierstrasz. 2008. Consistent Layout for Thematic Software Maps. In Proc. 15th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering(WCRE ’08). IEEE, 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCRE.2008.45Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Michele Lanza. 2001. The Evolution Matrix: Recovering Software Evolution Using Software Visualization Techniques. In Proc. 4th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution(IWPSE ’01). ACM, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/602461.602467Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. André Skupin. 2004. The world of geography: Visualizing a knowledge domain with cartographic means. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, suppl 1(2004), 5274–5278. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307654100Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Frank Steinbrückner and Claus Lewerentz. 2013. Understanding software evolution with software cities. Information Visualization 12, 2 (2013), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871612438785Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Eduardo F. Vernier, Joao L. D. Comba, and Alexandru C. Telea. 2021. Guided Stable Dynamic Projections. Computer Graphics Forum 40, 3 (2021), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14291Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lukas Wagner, Willy Scheibel, Daniel Limberger, Matthias Trapp, and Jürgen Döllner. 2020. A Framework for Interactive Exploration of Clusters in Massive Data using 3D Scatter Plots and WebGL. In Proc. 25th International Conference on 3D Web Technology(Web3D ’20). ACM, 31:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3424616.3424730Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Software Galaxies: Displaying Coding Activitiesusing a Galaxy Metaphor
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              VINCI '21: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction
              September 2021
              139 pages
              ISBN:9781450386470
              DOI:10.1145/3481549

              Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 27 November 2021

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • poster
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate71of193submissions,37%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format