skip to main content
10.1145/3484824.3484892acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdsmlaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Survey of Streaming Protocols for Video Transmission

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 January 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Communication has always been an important part of human life. In the last few years, communication over the Internet has evolved a lot and processes like live video streaming are common in the present time. To ensure video streaming in a fast and smooth way, streaming protocols are used which are continuously evolving and maturing. At present, many streaming protocols are available and many find it difficult to select a streaming protocol that best fits their requirements. This survey looks at the available streaming protocols along with their important features. The review of streaming protocols on the basis of different criteria is presented along with their performance analysis.

References

  1. .Viswanathan Swaminathan. 2013. Are we in the middle of a video streaming revolution? ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 9, 1s (October 2013), 1--6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2490826.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. .Anif Nurrohman and Maman Abdurohman. 2018. High Performance Streaming Based on H264 and Real Time Messaging Protocol (RTMP). In 2018 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), IEEE, Bandung, 174--177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICT.2018.8528770.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. .Iván Santos-González, Alexandra Rivero-García, Jezabel Molina-Gil, and Pino Caballero-Gil. 2017. Implementation and Analysis of Real-Time Streaming Protocols. Sensors 17, 4 (April 2017), 846. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040846Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. .Andrew Fecheyr-Lippens. A Review of HTTP Live Streaming. 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. .Xiaorui Li, Lei Wang, Jingwu Cui, and Baoyu Zheng. 2016. A New Fragmentation Strategy for Video of HTTP Live Streaming. In 2016 12th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks (MSN), IEEE, Hefei, China, 86--89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MSN.2016.022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. .Huan Wang, Kui Wu, Jianping Wang, and Guoming Tang. 2020. Rldish: Edge-Assisted QoE Optimization of HTTP Live Streaming with Reinforcement Learning. In IEEE INFOCOM 2020 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, IEEE, Toronto, ON, Canada, 706--715. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM41043.2020.9155467Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. .School of Computing, Information Systems & Mathematics, Kingston University, London, United Kingdom, M. G. Michalos, S. P. Kessanidis, University of Piraeus, Dpt of Digital Systems, Greece, S. L. Nalmpantis, and Dpt of Electrical Engineering, Kavala Institute of Technology, Kavala, Greece. 2012. Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP. JESTR 5, 2 (June 2012), 30--34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.052.06Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. .Christopher Müller, Stefan Lederer, and Christian Timmerer. 2012. An evaluation of dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP in vehicular environments. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Mobile Video - MoVid '12, ACM Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2151677.2151686.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. .Claudio Alberti, Daniele Renzi, Christian Timmerer, Christopher Mueller, Stefan Lederer, Stefano Battista, and Marco Mattavelli. 2013. Automated QoE evaluation of Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP. In 2013 Fifth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), IEEE, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria, 58--63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2013.6603211Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. .Parikshit Juluri, Venkatesh Tamarapalli, and Deep Medhi. 2015. SARA: Segment aware rate adaptation algorithm for dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW), IEEE, London, United Kingdom, 1765--1770. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCW.2015.7247436Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. .Koffka Khan and Wayne Goodridge. 2019. Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH) within P2P systems: a survey. IJANA 11, 01 (2019), 4155--4161. DOI:https://doi.org/10.35444/IJANA.2019.11014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. .Vasco Amaral, Solange Rito Lima, Telma Mota, and Paulo Chainho. 2014. Exploring WebRTC Technology for Enhanced Real-Time Services. In New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies, Volume 2, Álvaro Rocha, Ana Maria Correia, Felix. B Tan and Karl. A Stroetmann (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 43--52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05948-8_5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. .Julian Jang-Jaccard, Surya Nepal, Branko Celler, and Bo Yan. 2016. WebRTC-based video conferencing service for telehealth. Computing 98, 1--2.(January 2016), 169--193. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-014-0429-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. .https://restream.io/blog/streaming-protocols/, last accessed on 7 July, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. .Yury A. Ushakov, Margarita V. Ushakova, Alexander E. Shukhman, Petr N. Polezhaev, and Leonid V. Legashev. 2019. WebRTC based Platform for Video Conferencing in An Educational Environment. In 2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT), IEEE, Baku, Azerbaijan, 1--5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/AICT47866.2019.8981724Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. .Vamis Xhagjika, Oscar Divorra Escoda, Leandro Navarro, and Vladimir Vlassov. 2017. Media streams allocation and load patterns for a WebRTC cloud architecture. In 2017 8th International Conference on the Network of the Future (NOF), IEEE, London, 14--21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/NOF.2017.8251214Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. .Alexandre Gouaillard and Ludovic Roux. 2017. Real-time communication testing evolution with WebRTC 1.0. In 2017 Principles, Systems and Applications of IP Telecommunications (IPTComm), IEEE, Chicago, IL, 1--8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/IPTCOMM.2017.8169751Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. .Zinah Tareq Nayyef, Sarah Faris Amer, and Zena Hussain. Peer to Peer Multimedia Real-Time Communication System based on WebRTC Technology. International Journal of Engineering, 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. .Wenpeng Wang and Lingli Mei. 2017. A design of multimedia conferencing system based on WebRTC Technology. In 2017 8th IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON), IEEE, Vancouver, BC, 148--153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCON.2017.8117174Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. .T. P. Fowdur, N. Ramkorun, and P. K. Chiniah. 2020. Performance Analysis of WebRTC and SIP-based Audio and Video Communication Systems. SN COMPUT. SCI. 1, 6 (November 2020), 362. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00380-z.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. .Tofik Sonono. Interoperable Retransmission Protocols with Low Latency and Constrained Delay: A Performance Evaluation of RIST and SRT. 69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. .https://www.wowza.com/blog/streaming-protocols, last accessed on 7 July, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. .https://www.dacast.com/blog/video-streaming-protocol/, last accessed on 7 July, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Survey of Streaming Protocols for Video Transmission
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              DSMLAI '21': Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Science, Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
              August 2021
              415 pages
              ISBN:9781450387637
              DOI:10.1145/3484824

              Copyright © 2021 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 13 January 2022

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader