skip to main content
10.1145/3485190.3485209acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimmsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Game updates enhance players’ engagement: a case of DOTA2

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Game updates can affect player behavior. However, exactly how game updates affect players’ game engagement is unclear. In order to study this effect specifically, we took Defend of the Ancient 2, one of the most popular games on steam, as the background to analyze the change of players’ behavior before and after game updates. By collecting 17,253 players’ data and developing a two-way fixed effects model, two founding were discovered in our study. First, game updates can significantly enhance players’ engagement. Second, the effect of game updates is moderated by players’ game duration and recorded game rounds. We further explored the “paradox” phenomenon that game duration and recorded game rounds has the opposite effect on players’ game engagement.

References

  1. Aral, S. and Walker, D. 2011. Creating Social Contagion Through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks. Management Science. 57, 9 (Aug. 2011), 1623–1639. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Balakrishnan, J. and Gri, M.D. 2018. Loyalty towards online games , gaming addiction , and purchase intention towards online mobile in-game features. Computers in Human Behavior. 87, June (2018), 238–246. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Braun, P. 2017. Game Data Mining: Clustering and Visualization of Online Game Data in Cyber-Physical Worlds. Procedia Computer Science. 112, (2017), 2259–2268. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brodie, R.J. 2011. Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research. 14, 3 (2011), 252–271. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511411703.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Chen, W. 2018. Engaging Voluntary Contributions in Online Communities: A Hidden Markov Model. MIS Quarterly. 42, (Mar. 2018), 83–100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/14196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Choi, H.S. 2018. The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic quality cues of digital video games on sales: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems. 106, (2018), 86–96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.12.005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Claussen, J. 2013. The Effects of Rewarding User Engagement: The Case of Facebook Apps. Information Systems Research. 24, 1 (Jan. 2013), 186–200. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Conroy, E. 2021. Boosting: Rank and skill deception in esports. Entertainment Computing. 36, (2021), 100393. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Fleischmann, M. 2016. The role of software updates in information systems continuance — An experimental study from a user perspective. Decision Support Systems. 83, (2016), 83–96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.12.010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gkantsidis, C. 2006. Planet scale software updates. Computer Communication Review. 36, 4 (2006), 423–434. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1151659.1159961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Goldfarb, A. and Tucker, C.E. 2010. Privacy Regulation and Online Advertising. Management Science. 57, 1 (Oct. 2010), 57–71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hong, W. 2011. User Acceptance of Agile Information Systems: A Model and Empirical Test. J. of Management Information Systems. 28, (Jul. 2011), 235–272. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/41304611.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hudson, M. and Cairns, P. 2016. The effects of winning and losing on social presence in team-based digital games. Computers in Human Behavior. 60, (2016), 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hyeong, J.H. 2020. For whom does a game update? Players’ status-contingent gameplay on online games before and after an update. Decision Support Systems. 139, (2020), 113423. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113423.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin, D. 2017. Studying the urgent updates of popular games on the Steam platform. Empirical Software Engineering. 22, (Aug. 2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9480-2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mizutani, W.K. 2021. Software architecture for digital game mechanics: A systematic literature review. Entertainment Computing. 38, March (2021), 100421. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Mora-Cantallops, M. and Sicilia, M.Á. 2018. MOBA games: A literature review. Entertainment Computing. 26, February 2017 (2018), 128–138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2018.02.005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. NewZoo 2020. Video Game Industry Statistics In 2020. (2020). DOI:https://www.wepc.com/news/video-game-statistics/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Silva, M.P. 2017. Dynamic difficulty adjustment on MOBA games. Entertainment Computing. 18, (2017), 103–123. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2016.10.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sjöblom, M. 2019. The ingredients of Twitch streaming: Affordances of game streams. Computers in Human Behavior. 92, June 2018 (2019), 20–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Teng, C.-I. 2018. Look to the future: Enhancing online gamer loyalty from the perspective of the theory of consumption values. Decision Support Systems. 114, (2018), 49–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.08.007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Teng, C. 2010. Customization , immersion satisfaction , and online gamer loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior. 26, 6 (2010), 1547–1554. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.029.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Teng, C. 2017. Impact of avatar identification on online gamer loyalty: Perspectives of social identity and social capital theories. International Journal of Information Management. 37, 6 (2017), 601–610. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.06.006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Wang, Q. 2020. Research on the influence of balance patch on players’ character preference. Internet Research. ahead-of-p, (Feb. 2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-04-2019-0148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yi, J. 2019. Determinants of growth and decline in mobile game diffusion. Journal of Business Research. 99, October 2017 (2019), 363–372. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.045.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Zhang, L. 2020. Improved Dota2 lineup recommendation model based on a bidirectional LSTM. Tsinghua Science and Technology. 25, 6 (2020), 712–720. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2019.9010065.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Game updates enhance players’ engagement: a case of DOTA2
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            IMMS '21: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Management and Management Science
            August 2021
            332 pages
            ISBN:9781450384278
            DOI:10.1145/3485190

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 December 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format