skip to main content
10.1145/3485447.3512086acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards a Multi-View Attentive Matching for Personalized Expert Finding

Published: 25 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In Community Question Answering (CQA) websites, expert finding aims at seeking suitable experts to answer questions. The key is to explore the inherent relevance based on the representations of questions and experts. Existing methods usually learn these features from single view information (e.g., question title), which would be not insufficient to fully learn their representations. In this paper, we propose a personalized expert finding method with a multi-view attentive matching mechanism. We design three modules under the multi-view paradigm, including a question encoder, an intra-view encoder, and an inter-view encoder, which aims to comprehend the comprehensive relationships between experts and questions. In the question encoder, we learn the multi-view question features from its title, body and tag views respectively. In the intra-view encoder, we design an interactive attention network to capture the view-specific relevance between the target question and the historical answered questions of experts for all different views. Furthermore, in the inter-view encoder we employ a personalized attention network to aggregate different view information to learn expert/question representations. In this way, the match of the expert and question could be fully captured from the multi-view information via the intra- and inter-view mechanisms. Experimental results on six datasets demonstrate that the proposed method could achieve better performance than existing state-of-the-art methods.

References

[1]
David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (2003), 993–1022.
[2]
Xin Cao, Gao Cong, Bin Cui, Christian S Jensen, and Quan Yuan. 2012. Approaches to exploring category information for question retrieval in community question-answer archives. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 30, 2 (2012), 1–38.
[3]
Shuo Chang and Aditya Pal. 2013. Routing Questions for Collaborative Answering in Community Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (Niagara, Ontario, Canada) (ASONAM ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1145/2492517.2492559
[4]
Nick Craswell. 2009. Mean Reciprocal Rank.In Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer US, 1703.
[5]
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the International Conference on North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 4171–4186.
[6]
Jinlan Fu, Yi Li, Qi Zhang, Qinzhuo Wu, Renfeng Ma, Xuanjing Huang, and Yu-Gang Jiang. 2020. Recurrent memory reasoning network for expert finding in community question answering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 187–195.
[7]
Min Fu, Min Zhu, Yabo Su, Qiuhui Zhu, and Mingzhao Li. 2016. Modeling temporal behavior to identify potential experts in question answering communities. In International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization and Engineering. Springer, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 51–58.
[8]
Negin Ghasemi, Ramin Fatourechi, and Saeedeh Momtazi. 2021. User Embedding for Expert Finding in Community Question Answering. Proceedings of the ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 15, 4(2021), 1–16.
[9]
Po-Sen Huang, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, Alex Acero, and Larry Heck. 2013. Learning Deep Structured Semantic Models for Web Search Using Click through Data. In Proceedings of the Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (San Francisco, California, USA) (CIKM ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2333–2338. https://doi.org/10.1145/2505515.2505665
[10]
Kalervo Järvelin and Jaana Kekäläinen. 2002. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 20, 4 (2002), 422–446.
[11]
Zongcheng Ji and Bin Wang. 2013. Learning to rank for question routing in community question answering. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2363–2368.
[12]
Nal Kalchbrenner, Edward Grefenstette, and Phil Blunsom. 2014. A Convolutional Neural Network for Modelling Sentences. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, Maryland, 655–665. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-1062
[13]
Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations. Ithaca, NY: arXiv.org, 1–15.
[14]
Zeyu Li, Jyun-Yu Jiang, Yizhou Sun, and Wei Wang. 2019. Personalized question routing via heterogeneous network embedding. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. AAAI Press, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 192–199.
[15]
Xuebo Liu, Shuang Ye, Xin Li, Yonghao Luo, and Yanghui Rao. 2015. Zhihurank: A topic-sensitive expert finding algorithm in community question answering websites. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web-Based Learning. Springer, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 165–173.
[16]
Aditya Pal, F Maxwell Harper, and Joseph A Konstan. 2012. Exploring question selection bias to identify experts and potential experts in community question answering. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 30, 2 (2012), 1–28.
[17]
Matthew E. Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2018. Deep Contextualized Word Representations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2227–2237. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1202
[18]
Xipeng Qiu and Xuanjing Huang. 2015. Convolutional neural tensor network architecture for community-based question answering. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 7 pages.
[19]
Fatemeh Riahi, Zainab Zolaktaf, Mahdi Shafiei, and Evangelos Milios. 2012. Finding expert users in community question answering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 791–798.
[20]
Stephen Robertson and Hugo Zaragoza. 2009. The Probabilistic Relevance Framework: BM25 and Beyond. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 3, 4 (April 2009), 333–389. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000019
[21]
Rico Sennrich, Barry Haddow, and Alexandra Birch. 2016. Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, 1715–1725. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P16-1162
[22]
Mohsen Shahriari, Sathvik Parekodi, and Ralf Klamma. 2015. Community-aware ranking algorithms for expert identification in question-answer forums. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-driven Business. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8.
[23]
Alex J Smola and Bernhard Schölkopf. 2004. A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and computing 14, 3 (2004), 199–222.
[24]
Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The journal of Machine Learning Research 15, 1 (2014), 1929–1958.
[25]
Yizhou Sun, Jiawei Han, Xifeng Yan, Philip S Yu, and Tianyi Wu. 2011. Pathsim: Meta path-based top-k similarity search in heterogeneous information networks. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 4, 11 (2011), 992–1003.
[26]
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 6000–6010.
[27]
Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Mingxiao An, Jianqiang Huang, Yongfeng Huang, and Xing Xie. 2019. Neural News Recommendation with Attentive Multi-View Learning. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sarit Kraus (Ed.). AAAI Press, Macao, China, 3863–3869.
[28]
Liu Yang, Minghui Qiu, Swapna Gottipati, Feida Zhu, Jing Jiang, Huiping Sun, and Zhong Chen. 2013. Cqarank: jointly model topics and expertise in community question answering. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 99–108.
[29]
Sha Yuan, Yu Zhang, Jie Tang, Wendy Hall, and Juan Bautista Cabotà. 2020. Expert finding in community question answering: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review 53, 2 (2020), 843–874.
[30]
Xuchao Zhang, Wei Cheng, Bo Zong, Yuncong Chen, Jianwu Xu, Ding Li, and Haifeng Chen. 2020. Temporal Context-Aware Representation Learning for Question Routing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 753–761.
[31]
Guangyou Zhou, Kang Liu, and Jun Zhao. 2012. Joint relevance and answer quality learning for question routing in community QA. In Proceedings of the ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1492–1496.
[32]
Tom Chao Zhou, Michael R Lyu, and Irwin King. 2012. A classification-based approach to question routing in community question answering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 783–790.
[33]
Hengshu Zhu, Enhong Chen, Hui Xiong, Huanhuan Cao, and Jilei Tian. 2014. Ranking user authority with relevant knowledge categories for expert finding. World Wide Web 17, 5 (2014), 1081–1107.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Graph collaborative expert finding with contrastive learningProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.24963/ijcai.2024/253(2288-2296)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2024
  • (2024)PEPT: Expert Finding Meets Personalized Pre-TrainingACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/369038043:1(1-26)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2024
  • (2024)It Takes a Team to Triumph: Collaborative Expert Finding in Community QA NetworksProceedings of the 2024 Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval in the Asia Pacific Region10.1145/3673791.3698404(164-174)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Towards a Multi-View Attentive Matching for Personalized Expert Finding
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WWW '22: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
      April 2022
      3764 pages
      ISBN:9781450390965
      DOI:10.1145/3485447
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 25 April 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Community Question Answering
      2. Expert Finding
      3. Matching
      4. Multi-view
      5. Personalized

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      • Sustainable Development Project of Shenzhen
      • the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
      • State Key Laboratory of Communication Content Cognition
      • the National Natural Science Foundation of China

      Conference

      WWW '22
      Sponsor:
      WWW '22: The ACM Web Conference 2022
      April 25 - 29, 2022
      Virtual Event, Lyon, France

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Graph collaborative expert finding with contrastive learningProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.24963/ijcai.2024/253(2288-2296)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2024
      • (2024)PEPT: Expert Finding Meets Personalized Pre-TrainingACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/369038043:1(1-26)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2024
      • (2024)It Takes a Team to Triumph: Collaborative Expert Finding in Community QA NetworksProceedings of the 2024 Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval in the Asia Pacific Region10.1145/3673791.3698404(164-174)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2024
      • (2024)MATERExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121576237:PBOnline publication date: 1-Feb-2024
      • (2023)SE-PEF: a Resource for Personalized Expert FindingProceedings of the Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval in the Asia Pacific Region10.1145/3624918.3625335(288-309)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2023
      • (2023)Contrastive Representation Learning Based on Multiple Node-centered SubgraphsProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3583780.3614825(1338-1347)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
      • (2023)Ticket automationExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119984225:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2023
      • (2022)ExpertBert: Pretraining Expert FindingProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3511808.3557597(4244-4248)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2022

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media