skip to main content
10.1145/3485557.3485559acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesarabwicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Motion Tracked 3D Visualization System for Segmented ROI in Medical Imaging

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computer-aided diagnosis systems are increasingly used in the detection and segmentation of abnormalities in medical imaging. However, in many borderline cases, radiologists and physicians need to analyze the images to confirm the diagnosis. This paper proposes a novel analysis system for visualizing the output of 3D segmented abnormalities and the associated computer diagnoses. We use motion trackers to localize the user's viewing device and estimate its 3D orientation. We then use this tracking data to slice the segmented and labeled volume showing the abnormalities in real-time. The user can switch between the labeled and raw views to analyze the abnormalities’ boundaries. To test our visualization, we use our brain tumor segmentation pipeline using MRI scans to produce a labeled image and slice and visualize the tumor from all angles. Our system has a low latency of 0.01 seconds and can identify the viewing device's 3D location and orientation within a maximum of 0.2 cm and 2 degrees of error, respectively. The accuracy of our system depends on the segmentation pipeline. Our proposed system is also useful for medical training and as a visual feedback tool for computer-aided system's researchers and developers.

References

  1. "Worldwide cancer statistics”, Cancer Research UK," https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/worldwide-cancer. [Accessed: 14- Dec2018].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. Kohi, L. von Essen, G. Masika, M. Gottvall and J. Dol, "Cancer-related concerns and needs among young adults and children on cancer treatment in Tanzania: a qualitative study", BMC Cancer, vol. 19, no. 1, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. "”Cancer”, Who.int," https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer. [Accessed:14- Dec- 2018].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. W. Wired. ""Why Early Detection Is the Best Way to Beat Cancer"," https://www.wired.com/2008/12/ff-cancer/. [Accessed: 14- Dec- 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Shahbazi-Gahrouei, P. M. Khaniabadi, B. M. Khaniabadi, and S. Shahbazi-Gahrouei, “Medical imaging modalities using nanoprobes for cancer diagnosis: A literature review on recent findings,” Journal of research in medical sciences: the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, vol. 24, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. R. M. Al-shamasneh, and U. H. B. Obaidellah, “Artificial intelligence techniques for cancer detection and classification: review study,” European Scientific Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 342-370, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. Nakajima, H. Atsumi, A. H. Bhalerao, F. A. Jolesz, R. Kikinis, T. Yoshimine, T. M. Moriarty, and P. E. Stieg, “Computer-assisted surgical planning for cerebrovascular neurosurgery,” Neurosurgery, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 403-410, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. L. Sunwoo, Y. J. Kim, S. H. Choi, K.-G. Kim, J. H. Kang, Y. Kang, Y. J. Bae, R.-E. Yoo, J. Kim, and K. J. Lee, “Computer-aided detection of brain metastasis on 3D MR imaging: Observer performance study,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. e0178265, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Shin Nakajima, M.D., Hideki Atsumi, M.D., Abhir H. Bhalerao, Ph.D., Ferenc A. Jolesz, M.D., Ron Kikinis, M.D., Toshiki Yoshimine, M.D., Ph.D., Thomas M. Moriarty, M.D., Ph.D., Philip E. Stieg, Ph.D., M.D. Computer-assisted Surgical Planning for Cerebrovascular NeurosurgeryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cline HE, Lorensen WE, Souza SP, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R, Gerig G, Kennedy TE: 3D surface rendered MR images of the brain and its vasculature. Technical Note J Comput Assist Tomogr15:344-351, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Wells W, Kikinis R, Grimson W, Jolesz F: Adaptive segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 15:429-442, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sunwoo, L., Kim, Y. J., Choi, S. H., Kim, K., Kang, J. H., Kang, Y., . . . Kim, J. H. (2017, June 08). Computer-aided detection of brain metastasis on 3D MR imaging: Observer performance study. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464563/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Z. Fan, Y. Weng, G. Chen, and H. Liao, “3D interactive surgical visualization system using mobile spatial information acquisition and autostereoscopic display,” Journal of biomedical informatics, vol. 71, pp. 154-164, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. A. de Souza, A. A. C. Paz, I. J. Sanches, P. Nohama, and H. R. Gamba, "3D thermal medical image visualization tool: integration between MRI and thermographic images." pp. 5583-5586.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Z. Qingsong, K. C. Keong, N. W. Sing, and C. Yintao, "MRI head segmentation for object based volume visualization." pp. 361-366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. F. Ting, K. Sim, and Y. Lee, "Three-dimensional model reconstruction using surface interpolation with the interfacing of Hermite surface for breast cancer MRI imaging system." pp. 1-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. F. Yang, W. Zuo, K. Wang, and H. Zhang, "3D cardiac MRI data visualization based on volume data preprocessing and transfer function design." pp. 717-720.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Z. Zheng, and X. Mei, "MRI Head space-based segmentation for Object Based Volume Visualization." pp. 691-694.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. T. Tawara, and K. Ono, "A framework for volume segmentation and visualization using augmented reality." pp. 121-122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. M. Andrew, “Multiple view geometry in computer vision,” Kybernetes, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. D. F. DeMenthon, and L. S. Davis, “Model-based object pose in 25 lines of code,” International journal of computer vision, vol. 15, no. 1-2, pp. 123-141, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. "MATLAB - MathWorks.," https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. M. Maciejewski, "Evaluation of the SteamVR Motion Tracking System with a Custom-Made Tracker", Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 14, p. 6390, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. "Exploring Slices from a 3-Dimensional MRI Data Set- MATLAB & Simulink Example", Mathworks.com, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mathworks.com/help/images/exploring-slices-from-a-3-dimensional-mri-data-set.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Slicer.org. "3D Slicer," https://www.slicer.org/ [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. U. Technologies. "Unity," https://unity.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. G. Wheeler, S. Deng, N. Toussaint, K. Pushparajah, J. A. Schnabel, J. M. Simpson, and A. Gomez, “Virtual interaction and visualisation of 3D medical imaging data with VTK and Unity,” Healthcare technology letters, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 148-153, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. ""VIVE — VIVE Virtual Reality System", vive.com," https://www.vive.com/us/product/vive-virtual-reality-system/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. D. C. Niehorster, L. Li, and M. Lappe, “The accuracy and precision of position and orientation tracking in the HTC vive virtual reality system for scientific research,” i-Perception, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2041669517708205, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. D. Niehorster, L. Li and M. Lappe, "The Accuracy and Precision of Position and Orientation Tracking in the HTC Vive Virtual Reality System for Scientific Research", i-Perception, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 204166951770820, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Motion Tracked 3D Visualization System for Segmented ROI in Medical Imaging
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ArabWIC 2021: The 7th Annual International Conference on Arab Women in Computing in Conjunction with the 2nd Forum of Women in Research
            August 2021
            145 pages
            ISBN:9781450384186
            DOI:10.1145/3485557

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 29 November 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Author Tags

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate20of36submissions,56%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format