skip to main content
10.1145/3485557.3485583acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesarabwicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Does Team Integration Effect the Successful Implementation of Digital Transformation?

Published:29 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The research investigates the alignment of team integration and successful digital transformation in the UAE higher education sector. This research work identifies the key elements that define team integration from different prospects after a comprehensive literature review. In this research work, the relationship between the individuals and teams traits, technology aspects, and process aspects and successful digital transformation is identified. The findings of this research work will propose a framework that will be comprised of key team integration factors that can be used to enhance the implementation of digital transformation to the higher education sector in the UAE. Moreover, the education sector is slower is in adopting such new technologies more than other sectors which make making such an adoption difficult to implement unless a clear framework and practices are followed. The research findings will help decision makers and project managers to study and emphasize on such important factors emphasis and promote them push for such aspects to happen and to improve every time they start a transformation process or project. The conducted research uses a quantitative method, as data will be collected after distributing an online questionnaire distributed to different employees including leaders, project managers, academics and administration staff who worked or are working in digital transformation projects from different educational sectors in the United Arab Emirates.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. P. Parviainen, M. Tihinen, J. Kääriäinen, and S. Teppola, “Tackling the digitalization challenge: How to benefit from digitalization in practice,” Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 2017, doi: 10.12821/ijispm050104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Gupta, “Organizational Barriers to Digital Transformation,” Degree Proj. Ind. Manag., p. 75, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. G. Vial, “Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda,” J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 118–144, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. N. Verina and J. Titko, “Digital transformation: conceptual framework,” no. May, 2019, doi: 10.3846/cibmee.2019.073.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. V. Parida, D. Sjödin, and W. Reim, “Reviewing literature on digitalization, business model innovation, and sustainable industry: Past achievements and future promises,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11020391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Burns M., “Digital Transformation In The Education Industry: 5 Trends.,” 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.digitalistmag.com/future-of-work/2018/05/10/5-digital-transformationtrends-in-education-industry-06164785.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. O'Neill, “The Connected Campus: Digital Transformation in Education.,” Fortinet Blog., 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.fortinet.com/blog/business-and-technology/the-connectedcampus-digital-transformation-in-education.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. B. K. Baiden, A. D. F. Price, and A. R. J. Dainty, “The extent of team integration within construction projects,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. B. K. Baiden and A. D. F. Price, “The effect of integration on project delivery team effectiveness,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 129–136, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. A. Abdool, T. Governance, and D. Transformation, “Digital Transformation in Secondary Education: a Case Study of Ict Usage in Georgetown Guyana,” 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. K. Pousttchi, A. Gleiss, B. Buzzi, and M. Kohlhagen, “Technology impact types for digital transformation,” Proc. - 21st IEEE Conf. Bus. Informatics, CBI 2019, vol. 1, pp. 487–494, 2019, doi: 10.1109/CBI.2019.00063.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. T. Hess, C. Matt, A. Benlian, and F. Wiesböck, “Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy,” MIS Q. E, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 123–125, 2019, doi: 10.1108/10878571211209314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. D. S. Nguyen, “Success Factors That Influence Agile Software Development Project Success,” Am. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 172–222, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Hyvönen , “Strategic leading of digital transformation in large established companies-a multiple case-study,” J. Mark., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1–90, 2018, doi: 10.1509/jm.15.0481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. N. Sahu, H. Deng, and A. Mollah, “Investigating The Critical Success Factors Of Digital Transformation For Improving CustomerExperience,” CONF-IRM 2018 Proc., 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. G. C. Kane, D. Palmer, A. Philips Nguyen, D. Kiron, and N. Buckley, “Strategy, Not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation,” MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. Deloitte, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. N. Barnickel, H. Dib, and A. Bansal, “Digital Middle East: Transforming the region into a leading digital economy,” Digit. McKinsey, vol. 10, no. October, pp. 1–66, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. B. Mueller and U. Renken, “Helping Employees to be Digital Transformers,” 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. V. Gurbaxani and D. Dunkle, “Gearing up for successful digital transformation,” MIS Q. Exec., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 209–220, 2019, doi: 10.17705/2msqe.00017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. V. Rousseau, C. Aubé, and A. Savoie, “Teamwork behaviors: A review and an integration of frameworks,” Small Gr. Res., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 540–570, 2006, doi: 10.1177/1046496406293125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. D. R. Moore and A. R. J. Dainty, “Intra-team boundaries as inhibitors of performance improvemeent in UK design and build projects: A call for change,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 559–562, 2001, doi: 10.1080/01446190110055508.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. E. Godfrey Ochieng and A. D. Price, “Framework for managing multicultural project teams,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., 2009, doi: 10.1108/09699980911002557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. M. Mach and Y. Baruch, “Team performance in cross cultural project teams: The moderated mediation role of consensus, heterogeneity, faultlines and trust,” Cross Cult. Manag., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 464–486, 2015, doi: 10.1108/CCM-10-2014-0114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. V. H. Batt-Rawden, G. Lien, and T. Slåtten, “Team learning capability – an instrument for innovation ambidexterity?,” Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 473–486, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJQSS-02-2019-0026.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. D. Muijs, “Introduction to Quantitative Research,” in Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. T. Ipek Sahra Özgüler, Turkey Sertug Yilmaz and Abstract, “THE IMPACT OF PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT*,” PM World J., vol. V, no. Vi, pp. 1–13, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. M. F. Dulaimi, F. Y. Y. Ling, G. Ofori, and N. De Silva, “Enhancing integration and innovation in construction,” Build. Res. Inf., 2002, doi: 10.1080/09613210110115207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. M. Magni, L. Proserpio, M. Hoegl, and B. Provera, “The role of team behavioral integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation,” Res. Policy, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1044–1053, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. B. K. Baiden , “Teamwork behaviors: A review and an integration of frameworks,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1046496406293125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. R. Johnson, “Six Principles of Effective Management,” 2008. http://ezinearticles.com/?Six-Principles-of-Effective-Team-Management&id=1803062.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. V. Lalsing, “People Factors in Agile Software Development and Project Management,” Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 117–137, 2012, doi: 10.5121/ijsea.2012.3109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. C. Y. Chiu, H. C. Lin, and S. H. Chien, “Transformational leadership and team behavioral integration: The mediating role of team learning,” Acad. Manag. 2009 Annu. Meet. Green Manag. Matters, AOM 2009, 2009, doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2009.44251829.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. I. Mergel, “Digital service teams in government,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 36, no. 4, p. 101389, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. G. D. Holt, P. E. d. Love, and L. Jawahar Nesan, “Employee empowerment in construction: An implementation model for process improvement,” Team Perform. Manag. An Int. J., 2000, doi: 10.1108/13527590010343007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. M. N. M. Nawi, A. Lee, K. A. M. Kamar, and Z. A. Hamid, “A critical literature review on the concept of team integration in industrialised building System (IBS) project,” Malaysian Constr. Res. J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. G. A. Churchill, “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,” J. Mark. Res., 1979, doi: 10.2307/3150876.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Does Team Integration Effect the Successful Implementation of Digital Transformation?
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ArabWIC 2021: The 7th Annual International Conference on Arab Women in Computing in Conjunction with the 2nd Forum of Women in Research
        August 2021
        145 pages
        ISBN:9781450384186
        DOI:10.1145/3485557

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 November 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate20of36submissions,56%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format