ABSTRACT
The research investigates the alignment of team integration and successful digital transformation in the UAE higher education sector. This research work identifies the key elements that define team integration from different prospects after a comprehensive literature review. In this research work, the relationship between the individuals and teams traits, technology aspects, and process aspects and successful digital transformation is identified. The findings of this research work will propose a framework that will be comprised of key team integration factors that can be used to enhance the implementation of digital transformation to the higher education sector in the UAE. Moreover, the education sector is slower is in adopting such new technologies more than other sectors which make making such an adoption difficult to implement unless a clear framework and practices are followed. The research findings will help decision makers and project managers to study and emphasize on such important factors emphasis and promote them push for such aspects to happen and to improve every time they start a transformation process or project. The conducted research uses a quantitative method, as data will be collected after distributing an online questionnaire distributed to different employees including leaders, project managers, academics and administration staff who worked or are working in digital transformation projects from different educational sectors in the United Arab Emirates.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
- P. Parviainen, M. Tihinen, J. Kääriäinen, and S. Teppola, “Tackling the digitalization challenge: How to benefit from digitalization in practice,” Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 2017, doi: 10.12821/ijispm050104.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Gupta, “Organizational Barriers to Digital Transformation,” Degree Proj. Ind. Manag., p. 75, 2018.Google Scholar
- G. Vial, “Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda,” J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 118–144, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Verina and J. Titko, “Digital transformation: conceptual framework,” no. May, 2019, doi: 10.3846/cibmee.2019.073.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Parida, D. Sjödin, and W. Reim, “Reviewing literature on digitalization, business model innovation, and sustainable industry: Past achievements and future promises,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11020391.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Burns M., “Digital Transformation In The Education Industry: 5 Trends.,” 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.digitalistmag.com/future-of-work/2018/05/10/5-digital-transformationtrends-in-education-industry-06164785.Google Scholar
- S. O'Neill, “The Connected Campus: Digital Transformation in Education.,” Fortinet Blog., 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.fortinet.com/blog/business-and-technology/the-connectedcampus-digital-transformation-in-education.html.Google Scholar
- B. K. Baiden, A. D. F. Price, and A. R. J. Dainty, “The extent of team integration within construction projects,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. K. Baiden and A. D. F. Price, “The effect of integration on project delivery team effectiveness,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 129–136, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. A. Abdool, T. Governance, and D. Transformation, “Digital Transformation in Secondary Education: a Case Study of Ict Usage in Georgetown Guyana,” 2019.Google Scholar
- K. Pousttchi, A. Gleiss, B. Buzzi, and M. Kohlhagen, “Technology impact types for digital transformation,” Proc. - 21st IEEE Conf. Bus. Informatics, CBI 2019, vol. 1, pp. 487–494, 2019, doi: 10.1109/CBI.2019.00063.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Hess, C. Matt, A. Benlian, and F. Wiesböck, “Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy,” MIS Q. E, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 123–125, 2019, doi: 10.1108/10878571211209314.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. S. Nguyen, “Success Factors That Influence Agile Software Development Project Success,” Am. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 172–222, 2016.Google Scholar
- J. Hyvönen , “Strategic leading of digital transformation in large established companies-a multiple case-study,” J. Mark., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1–90, 2018, doi: 10.1509/jm.15.0481.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Sahu, H. Deng, and A. Mollah, “Investigating The Critical Success Factors Of Digital Transformation For Improving CustomerExperience,” CONF-IRM 2018 Proc., 2018.Google Scholar
- G. C. Kane, D. Palmer, A. Philips Nguyen, D. Kiron, and N. Buckley, “Strategy, Not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation,” MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. Deloitte, 2015.Google Scholar
- N. Barnickel, H. Dib, and A. Bansal, “Digital Middle East: Transforming the region into a leading digital economy,” Digit. McKinsey, vol. 10, no. October, pp. 1–66, 2016.Google Scholar
- B. Mueller and U. Renken, “Helping Employees to be Digital Transformers,” 2017.Google Scholar
- V. Gurbaxani and D. Dunkle, “Gearing up for successful digital transformation,” MIS Q. Exec., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 209–220, 2019, doi: 10.17705/2msqe.00017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Rousseau, C. Aubé, and A. Savoie, “Teamwork behaviors: A review and an integration of frameworks,” Small Gr. Res., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 540–570, 2006, doi: 10.1177/1046496406293125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. R. Moore and A. R. J. Dainty, “Intra-team boundaries as inhibitors of performance improvemeent in UK design and build projects: A call for change,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 559–562, 2001, doi: 10.1080/01446190110055508.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Godfrey Ochieng and A. D. Price, “Framework for managing multicultural project teams,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., 2009, doi: 10.1108/09699980911002557.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Mach and Y. Baruch, “Team performance in cross cultural project teams: The moderated mediation role of consensus, heterogeneity, faultlines and trust,” Cross Cult. Manag., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 464–486, 2015, doi: 10.1108/CCM-10-2014-0114.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. H. Batt-Rawden, G. Lien, and T. Slåtten, “Team learning capability – an instrument for innovation ambidexterity?,” Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 473–486, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJQSS-02-2019-0026.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Muijs, “Introduction to Quantitative Research,” in Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS, 2012.Google Scholar
- T. Ipek Sahra Özgüler, Turkey Sertug Yilmaz and Abstract, “THE IMPACT OF PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT*,” PM World J., vol. V, no. Vi, pp. 1–13, 2016.Google Scholar
- M. F. Dulaimi, F. Y. Y. Ling, G. Ofori, and N. De Silva, “Enhancing integration and innovation in construction,” Build. Res. Inf., 2002, doi: 10.1080/09613210110115207.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Magni, L. Proserpio, M. Hoegl, and B. Provera, “The role of team behavioral integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation,” Res. Policy, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1044–1053, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. K. Baiden , “Teamwork behaviors: A review and an integration of frameworks,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1046496406293125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Johnson, “Six Principles of Effective Management,” 2008. http://ezinearticles.com/?Six-Principles-of-Effective-Team-Management&id=1803062.Google Scholar
- V. Lalsing, “People Factors in Agile Software Development and Project Management,” Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 117–137, 2012, doi: 10.5121/ijsea.2012.3109.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Y. Chiu, H. C. Lin, and S. H. Chien, “Transformational leadership and team behavioral integration: The mediating role of team learning,” Acad. Manag. 2009 Annu. Meet. Green Manag. Matters, AOM 2009, 2009, doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2009.44251829.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Mergel, “Digital service teams in government,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 36, no. 4, p. 101389, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. D. Holt, P. E. d. Love, and L. Jawahar Nesan, “Employee empowerment in construction: An implementation model for process improvement,” Team Perform. Manag. An Int. J., 2000, doi: 10.1108/13527590010343007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. N. M. Nawi, A. Lee, K. A. M. Kamar, and Z. A. Hamid, “A critical literature review on the concept of team integration in industrialised building System (IBS) project,” Malaysian Constr. Res. J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2011.Google Scholar
- G. A. Churchill, “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,” J. Mark. Res., 1979, doi: 10.2307/3150876.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Does Team Integration Effect the Successful Implementation of Digital Transformation?
Recommendations
Inclusive digital transformation in South Africa: an institutional perspective
ICEGOV '18: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceSouth Africa has adopted digital transformation as one of its strategies for promoting inclusive growth. This is a case study of South Africa, a developing country that has embraced the digital transformation agenda to promote the transformation of ...
Digital transformation model: analytic approach on participatory governance & community engagement in India
dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data AgeGovernments around the globe are more and more aiming at digital and participatory governance to become more integrative and responsive for citizen-centric superior service delivery. Reconstruction of the technical and structural framework is also going ...
Affording and Constraining Digital Transformation:: The Enactment of Structural Change in Three Swedish Government Agencies
Electronic GovernmentAbstractPublic sector organizations need to adapt to the ongoing societal changes and new technologies emerging, and as public sector organizations engage in digital transformation, they are confronted with the need to re-arrange and change themselves to ...
Comments