skip to main content
10.1145/3486011.3486518acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Role of Remote Laboratories on STEM Education and the Digital Economy: An overview for Brazil in the 2020’s

Published:20 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This article provides an overview of the current status of remote laboratories in selected engineering schools in Brazil participating in the VISIR+ project, highlighting the importance of their popularization and expansion to strengthen the country´s effort to better educate engineers in the context of challenges and opportunities of the digital revolution for the innovation economy of the 21st century. It links this reality with the societal impacts of the digital technological revolution accelerated by Artificial Intelligence, Advanced Robotics, Machine Learning and Ubiquitous Internet. It also presents selected updated key indicators of engineering education in Brazil calling for effective policies to modernize the curricula and practices of engineering courses and training of professional engineers to meet the skills required by these new technologies and market demands. It concludes that remote laboratories are an important tool to support the country´s efforts to succeed on a track to migrate its commodities-based economy into a more sophisticated knowledge based innovative economy.

References

  1. McKinsey Global Institute. Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. 2013. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/disruptive-technologies. Access 06/05/2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Imperial College London TechForesight. Table of Disruptive Technologies. 2018. https://imperialtechforesight.com/visions/table-of-disruptive-technologies-2/. Access 06/05/2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BLOEM, J. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Things to Tighten the Link between IT and OT. Sogeti VINT2014, 2014. Available at: https://www.sogeti.com/globalassets/global/special/sogeti-things3en.pdf. Access 04.06.2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. SCHWAB, Klaus. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. What It Means and How to Respond. s.l. : World Economic Forum, 2015. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/. Access 29.05.2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. World Economic Forum. The Future of Jobs Report 2020. 2020. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020. Access 06.12.21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. UNESCO. Science Report Towards 2030. 2015. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235406. Access 06.12.2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. USP, ESALQ. Agribusiness in Brazil represented 26.6% of GDP in 2020. 2021. Available at: https://www.cepea.esalq.usp.br/br/pib-do-agronegocio-brasileiro.aspx. Access 06/14/2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornell University, European Institute of Business Administration (Insead) and The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Who Will Finance Innovation? 2021. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2020/. Access 06/10/2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. UNESCO. Science, Technology and Innovation in Brazil. Recommendations on Open Science. 2021. Available at: https://pt.unesco.org/fieldoffice/brasilia/expertise/science-technology-innovation. Access 06.15.2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ministry of Education of Brazil (MEC). Resolução nº 48/1976, de 27 de Abril de 1976. 1976. https://www.em.ufop.br/files/14_Resoluo_CFE_N_48_de_27_de_abril_de_1976.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. BRASIL, INEP, MEC. The 2019 Higher education census. . 2020. Available at: https://www.gov.br/inep/pt-br/areas-de-atuacao/pesquisas-estatisticas-e-indicadores/censo-da-educacao-superior. Access 06.13.2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Brasil, Ministry of Education, Federal Education Council. Resolution CNE/CES 2/2019, National Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Engineering Courses. 2019. Available at https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/resolu%C3%87%C3%83o-n%C2%BA-2-de-24-de-abril-de-2019-85344528. Access 06.15.2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Educause, NMC. Higher Education Horizon Report - The Future of Teaching and Learning. 2016. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2016/2/2016-horizon-report. Access 06.15.2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. PAVANI, Ana, M. B, Different Uses for Remote Labs in Electrical Engineering Education: Initial Conclusions of an Ongoing Experience. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil : s.n., 2017. https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/32515/32515.PDF. Access 06.25.2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. SIMÃO, J. P. Modelo para registro de dados de experiência de aprendizagem em laboratórios remotos. Araranguá/SC, Dissertação (Mestrado), Curso de Tecnologias da Informação e Comunicação. s.l. : Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2018. Available at: :https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/191118. Access 05.18.2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. ABENGE Brazilian Association of Engineering Education. XLVI Brazilian Congress of Engineering Education – COBENGE 2018. Results and Extensions of the VISIR+ Project in Brazil: An international perspective. 2018. Available at: http://www.abenge.org.br/arquivos/downloads/livro/Visir22dez.pdf. Access 06.20.2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Role of Remote Laboratories on STEM Education and the Digital Economy: An overview for Brazil in the 2020’s
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        TEEM'21: Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21)
        October 2021
        823 pages
        ISBN:9781450390668
        DOI:10.1145/3486011
        • Editors:
        • Marc Alier,
        • David Fonseca

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 December 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format