skip to main content
10.1145/3486637.3489494acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Movements in the forest during COVID-19 lockdown in the Czech Republic: interaction between humans and wild boars

Published: 02 November 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The COVID-19 lockdown limited human activity in certain areas of life, particularly travel and gathering indoors. Consequently, many people spent more time outdoors, penetrating natural areas and potentially putting pressure on wildlife. Increased interest in outdoor recreational activities during the lockdown period of 2020 was observed in the suburban forest near Prague (Czech Republic), where human visitation to the same period of 2019 increased by fivefold. Could this increased human presence alter the spatial behaviour of wildlife? In this study, we present the wild boar's space use and movement patterns during the first Covid-19 lockdown in the Czech Republic and compare them to the same period in 2019 with no Covid-19 restrictions. In total, we equipped 40 wild boars with GPS and biologger devices in the suburban forest "Kostelec nad Černými Lesy" in the Czech Republic. We calculated daily home ranges and step length, turning angle, and net square displacement. Human activity was measured daily using an automatic counter of humans entering the forest by a road. We hypothesised that the increased presence of humans in the forest alters daily movements and daily range of wild boars. Our preliminary analyses from the first lockdown period in spring 2020 show that increased human presence resulted in allocation of movement activity toward nighttime by increasing the distance travelled at night. We provide important insights into how increased human activity due to COVID-19 related restriction affect wild boar's spatial movement and space use.

References

[1]
Christian Rutz, Matthias-Claudio Lorctto, Amanda E. Bates, Sarah C. Davidson, Carlos M. Duarte. 2020. COVID-19 lockdown allows researchers to quantify the effects of human activity on wildlife. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1156--1159.
[2]
Raoul Manenti, Emiliano Mori, Viola Di Canio, Silvia Mercurio, Marco Picone. 2020. The good, the bad and the ugly of COVID-19 lockdown effects on wildlife conservation: Insights from the first European locked down country. Biol. Conserv. 249, 108728.
[3]
Harekrishna Bar. 2020. COVID-19 lockdown: animal life, ecosystem and atmospheric environment. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 1--18.
[4]
Kaitlyn M. Gaynor, Cherly E. Hojnowski, Neil H. Carter, Justin S. Brashares. 2018. The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science 360, 1232--1235.
[5]
Courtney L. Larson, Sarah E. Reed, Adina M. Merenlender, Kevin R. Crooks. 2016. Effects of Recreation on Animals Revealed as Widespread through a Global Systematic Review. PLOS ONE 11, e0167259.
[6]
Barry R, Noon, Larissa L. Bailey, Thomas D. Sisk, Kevin S. McKelvey. 2012. Efficient species-level monitoring at the landscape scale. Conserv. Biol. J. Soc. Conserv. Biol. 26, 432--441.
[7]
Jorge García Molinos, Benjamin S. Halpern, David S. Schoeman, Christopher J. Brown, Wolfgang Kiessling. 2016. Climate velocity and the future global redistribution of marine biodiversity. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 83--88.
[8]
Charlie Huveneers, Fabrice R. A. Jaine, Adam Barnett, Paul A. Butcher, Thomas M. Clarke. 2021. The power of national acoustic tracking networks to assess the impacts of human activity on marine organisms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Biol. Conserv. 256, 108995.
[9]
John C. Morrison, Wes Sechrest, Eric Dinerstein, David S. Wilcove, John F. Lamoreux. 2007. Persistence of Large Mammal Faunas as Indicators of Global Human Impacts. J. Mammal. 88, 1363--1380.
[10]
Stephen S. Ditchkoff, Sarah T. Saalfeld, Charles J. Gibson. 2006. Animal behavior in urban ecosystems: Modifications due to human-induced stress. Urban Ecosyst. 9, 5--12.
[11]
Oliver Keuling, Tomasz Podgórski, Andrea Monaco, Mario Melletti, Dorota Merta. 2017. Eurasian Wild Boar Sus scrofa (Linnaeus, 1758), in: Ecology, Conservation and Management of Wild Pigs and Peccaries, pp. 202--233.
[12]
Lilian Patricia Sales, Bruno R. Ribeiro, Matt Warrington Hayward, Adriano Paglia, Marcelo Passamani, Rafael Loyola. 2017. Niche conservatism and the invasive potential of the wild boar. J. Anim. Ecol. 86, 1214--1223.
[13]
Lutz Briedermann. 2009. Schwarzwild, 1st ed. Franckh Kosmos Verlag, Stuttgart
[14]
WHO.int, 2020. WHO announces COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic [WWW Document]. URL https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/news/news/2020/3/who-announces-covid-19-outbreak-a-pandemic (accessed 9.16.21).
[15]
Amanda E. Bates, Richard B. Primack, Paula Moraga, Carlos M. Duarte. 2020. COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown as a "Global Human Confinement Experiment" to investigate biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 248, 108665.
[16]
Miguel A. Bedoya-Pérez, Michael P. Ward, Max Loomes, Iain S. McGregor, Mathew S. Crowther. 2021. The effect of COVID19 pandemic restrictions on an urban rodent population. Sci. Rep. 11, 12957.
[17]
Rajeev Saraswat, Divya Atri Saraswat. 2020. Research opportunities in pandemic lockdown. Science.
[18]
Masahi Soga, Maldwyn J. Evans, Daniel T. C. Cox, Kevin J. Gaston. 2021. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on human-nature interactions: Pathways, evidence and implications. People Nat. 3, 518--527.
[19]
Ben L. Gilby, Christopher J. Henderson, Andrew D. Olds, Jasmine A. Ballantyne, Ellen L. Bingham. 2021. Potentially negative ecological consequences of animal redistribution on beaches during COVID-19 lockdown. Biol. Conserv. 253, 108926.
[20]
Massimo Fenati, Andrea Monaco, Vittorio Guberti. 2008. Efficiency and safety of xylazine and tiletamine/zolazepam to immobilise captured wild boars (Sus scrofa L. 1758): analysis of field results. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 54, 269--274.
[21]
vlada.cz, 2020. Measures adopted by the Czech Government against the Coronavirus | Government of the Czech Republic [WWW Document]. URL https://www.vlada.cz/en/media-centrum/aktualne/measures-adopted-by-the-czech-government-against-coronavirus-180545#general (accessed 9.16.21).
[22]
Clement Calenge. 2006. The package "adehabitat" for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol. Model. 197, 516--519.
[23]
Douglas Bates, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, Steve Walker. 2014. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. ArXiv E-Prints arXiv:1406.
[24]
Kenneth P. Burnham, David R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[25]
Marc J. Mazerolle. 2020. AICcmodavg: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference Based on (Q)AIC(c).
[26]
Daniel Lüdecke. 2018. ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 772.
[27]
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, 2021. Tierische Pause vom Menschen [WWW Document]. URL https://www.mpg.de/15005711/covid-19-bio-logging-initiative (accessed 9.8.21).
[28]
Tomasz Podgórski, Grzegorz Baś, Bogumila Jędrzejewska Leif Sönnichsen, Stanislaw Śnieżko, Wlodzimierz Jędrzejewski. 2013. Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: primeval forest and metropolitan area. J. Mammal. 94, 109--119.
[29]
Franz Johann, Markus Handschuh, Peter Linderoth, Carsten F. Dormann, Janosch Arnold. 2020. Adaptation of wild boar (Sus scrofa) activity in a human-dominated landscape. BMC Ecol. 20, 4.
[30]
Gunter Sodeikat, Klaus Pohlmeyer. 2007. Impact of drive hunts on daytime resting site areas of wild boar family groups (Sus scrofa L.). Wildl. Biol. Pract. Vol 3 No 1 2007 28--38 3.
[31]
Index Mundi, 2020. Population density by country - Thematic Map - Europe [WWW Document]. URL https://www.indexmundi.com/map/?v=21000&r=eu&l=en (accessed 9.16.21).
[32]
Femke Broekhuis, Emily K. Madsen, Britt Klaassen. 2019. Predators and pastoralists: how anthropogenic pressures inside wildlife areas influence carnivore space use and movement behaviour. Anim. Conserv. 22, 404--416.
[33]
Marlee A. Tucker, Katrin Böhning-Gaese, William F. Fagan, John M. Fryxell, Bram Van Moorter. 2018. Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science 359, 466--469.
[34]
Ana Benítez-López. 2018. Animals feel safer from humans in the dark. Science 360, 1185--1186.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Outdoor Recreation Habits of People in Latvia: General Trends, and Changes during the COVID-19 PandemicSustainability10.3390/su1414847814:14(8478)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2022
  • (2022)HaniMob 2021 Workshop Report: The 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Animal Movement Ecology and Human MobilitySIGSPATIAL Special10.1145/3578484.357849213:3(33-36)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HANIMOB '21: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Animal Movement Ecology and Human Mobility
November 2021
53 pages
ISBN:9781450391221
DOI:10.1145/3486637
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 November 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. COVID-19 lockdown
  2. anthropogenic effects
  3. spatial behaviour
  4. wild boar

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • EVA4.0
  • OP RDE project Improvement in Quality of the Internal Grant Scheme at CZ

Conference

SIGSPATIAL '21
Sponsor:

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Outdoor Recreation Habits of People in Latvia: General Trends, and Changes during the COVID-19 PandemicSustainability10.3390/su1414847814:14(8478)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2022
  • (2022)HaniMob 2021 Workshop Report: The 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Animal Movement Ecology and Human MobilitySIGSPATIAL Special10.1145/3578484.357849213:3(33-36)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media