skip to main content
10.1145/3487075.3487152acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Human Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data: Axis-Wise Versus Axes-Resultant Feature Extraction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Benefitting from the development of pervasive computing, recent years have witnessed a variety of meaningful human-centric applications, where automating the recognition of human activities plays a central role in bridging the gap between sensing data and high-level services. Accelerometer-based activity recognizer often remains a priority due to its recognition performance, low costs, and portability, however, few studies systematically investigate how to extract and use features from the time-series sensor data and further compare their discriminant power. To this end, we herein propose two different ways of extracting features and exploring their combinations. Specifically, we take as a resultant axis or separate channels the accelerometer axes and then extract axes-resultant and axis-wise features. Afterwards, we evaluate the cases where the two feature sets are used separately or jointly. Finally, we conduct comparative experiments on two public activity recognition datasets with five different classification models in terms of four performance metrics. Results show that the use of axis-wise features outperforms its competitor in the majority across the datasets and that their joint use generally leads to enhanced accuracy.

References

  1. A Haque, A Milstein and L Fei-Fei (2020). Illuminating the dark spaces of healthcare with ambient intelligence. Nature, 585(7824), 193-202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A Wang, S Zhao, C Zheng, J Yang, G Chen and CY Chang (2021). Activities of daily living recognition with binary environment sensors using deep learning: A comparative study. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(4), 5423-5433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A Bulling, U Blanke and B. Schiele (2014). A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(3), 1-33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A Wang, G Chen, J Yang, S Zhao and CY Chang (2016). A comparative study on human activity recognition using inertial sensors in a smartphone. IEEE Sensors Journal,16(11), 4566-4578.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. X Zhou, W Liang, I Kevin, K Wang, H Wang, LT Yang and Q Jin (2020). Deep-learning-enhanced human activity recognition for Internet of healthcare things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(7), 6429-6438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A Wang, G Chen, X Wu, L Liu, N An and CY Chang (2018). Towards human activity recognition: A hierarchical feature selection framework. Sensors, 18(11), 3629.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J Kwapisz, G Weiss and S Moore (2011). Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SigKDD Explorations Newsletter, 12(2), 74-82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P Zappi, C Lombriser, T Stiefmeier, E Farella, D Roggen, L Benini and G Tröster. Activity recognition from on-body sensors: Accuracy-power trade-off by dynamic sensor selection. Proceeding of European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks, 2008, pp. 17-33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S Rosati, G Balestra and M Knaflitz (2018). Comparison of different sets of features for human activity recognition by wearable sensors. Sensors, 18(12), 4189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A Ignatov (2018). Real-time human activity recognition from accelerometer data using convolutional neural networks. Applied Soft Computing, 62, 915-922.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C Lübbe, B Friedrich, S Fudickar, S Hellmers and A Hein. Feature based random forest nurse care activity recognition using accelerometer data. Adjunct Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2020, pp. 408-413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D Anguita, A Ghio, L Oneto, X Parra and JL Reyes-Ortiz. A public domain dataset for human activity recognition using smartphones. Proceedings of 21st European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, 2013, pp. 437–442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A Wang, S Zhao, C Zheng, H Chen, L Liu and G Chen (2021). HierHAR: Sensor-based data-driven hierarchical human activity recognition, IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(3), 3353-3365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A Wang, X Wu, L Zhao, H Chen, S Zhao (2021). Physical activity recognition from accelerometer data using multi-view aggregation. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 24(4), 611-620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. C Ronao and S Cho (2016). Human activity recognition with smartphone sensors using deep learning neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 59, 235-244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. H Ma, W Li, X Zhang, S Gao and S Lu. AttnSense: Multi-level attention mechanism for multimodal human activity recognition. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019, pp. 3109-3115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Human Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data: Axis-Wise Versus Axes-Resultant Feature Extraction
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CSAE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
          October 2021
          660 pages
          ISBN:9781450389853
          DOI:10.1145/3487075

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 December 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate368of770submissions,48%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format