skip to main content
10.1145/3487075.3487175acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Intelligent Lane Changing Decision Method for Connected Vehicles

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Aiming at the problem of driving scenarios redundancy in the lane change decision-making, this paper proposes a deep reinforcement learning method (DRL) for lane change decision based on embedded attention mechanism (CADQN). The algorithm introduces the Convolutional Attention Mechanism Module (CBAM) into the DQN network to optimize the scenarios in time and space dimensions, and assist connected vehicles in making lane changing decisions. The algorithm is verified by the traffic simulation platform under the highway environment, and the results show that CADQN is helpful to improve the global traffic efficiency, and with the increase of traffic flow density, the benefit is more significant. Moreover, the visualization results of the attention layer in the CADQN can guide the optimization of the driving scenario.

References

  1. L Li, R Jiang, B Jia and X M Zhao, 2010. Modern Traffic Flow Theory and Applications, Vol. I, Highway Traffic. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China. ISBN 978-7-302-23807-2 (in Chinese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cassidy, M. J., & Bertini, R. L. (1999). Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 33(1), 25-42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. R. L. Bertini and M. T. Leal (2005). Empirical study of traffic features at a freeway lane drop. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131(6), 397-407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Y. Hou, P. Edara and C. Sun (2013). Modeling mandatory lane changing using Bayes classifier and decision trees. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(2), 647-655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. A. Laval and C. F. Daganzo (2006). Lane-changing in traffic streams. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 40(3), 251-264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. C Munoz and C. F. Daganzo (2002). Moving bottlenecks: a theory grounded on experimental observation. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. N. H. Gartner, P. J. Tarnoff, and C. M. Andrews (1991). Evaluation of optimized policies for adaptive control strategy. Transportation Research Record, (1324).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Brackstone,, M. McDonald and J. Wu (1998). Lane changing on the motorway: Factors affecting its occurrence, and their implications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Lygeros, D. N. Godbole and S. Sastry (1998). Verified hybrid controllers for automated vehicles. IEEE transactions on automatic control, 43(4), 522-539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. K. Nagel, D. E. Wolf, P. Wagner and P Simon (1998). Two-lane traffic rules for cellular automata: A systematic approach. Physical Review E, 58(2), 1425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. Maerivoet and B. De Moor (2005). Cellular automata models of road traffic. Physics reports, 419(1), 1-64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. Eidehall, J. Pohl, F. Gustafsson and J. Ekmark (2007). Toward autonomous collision avoidance by steering. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 8(1), 84-94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. D. Salvucci, H. M. Mandalia, N. Kuge, and T. Yamamura. (2007). Lane-change detection using a computational driver model. Human factors, 49(3), 532-542.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Doshi, and M. Trivedi (2008). A comparative exploration of eye gaze and head motion cues for lane change intent prediction. In 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (pp. 49-54). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. R. J.Kiefer and J. M. Hankey (2008). Lane change behavior with a side blind zone alert system. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(2), 683-690.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. L S Jin, W P Fang, Y N Zhang, S B Yang and H J Hou (2009). Research on safety lane change model of driver assistant system on highway. In 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (pp. 1051-1056). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. P. G. Gipps (1986). A model for the structure of lane-changing decisions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 20(5), 403-414.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. P. G. Gipps (1981). A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 15(2), 105-111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. K. Ahmed, B. M. Akiva, H. Koutsopoulos, and R. Mishalani (1996). Models of freeway lane changing and gap acceptance behavior. Transportation and traffic theory, 13, 501-515.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. K. I. Ahmed, (1999). Modeling drivers' acceleration and lane changing behavior (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. J. G. Hunt and G. D. Lyons (1994). Modelling dual carriageway lane changing using neural networks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 231-245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. A. Dumbuya, A. Booth, N. Reed, A. Kirkham, T. Philpott, J. Zhao and R. Wood (2009). Complexity of traffic interactions: Improving behavioural intelligence in driving simulation scenarios. In Complex systems and self-organization modelling (pp. 201-209), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. X. Li, X. Xu and L. Zuo (2015). Reinforcement learning based overtaking decision-making for highway autonomous driving. In 2015 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Control and Information Processing (ICICIP) (pp. 336-342). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Y. Li, (2017). Deep reinforcement learning: An overview. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. G. Bellemare, ... and D. Hassabis (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. nature, 518(7540), 529-533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Woo, J. Park, J. Y. Lee and I. S. Kweon (2018). Cbam: Convolutional block attention module. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) (pp. 3-19).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. E. Leurent (2018) An environment for autonomous driving decision-making. https://github.com/eleurent/highway-env.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Treiber, A. Hennecke and D. Helbing (2000). Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Physical review E, 62(2), 1805.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An Intelligent Lane Changing Decision Method for Connected Vehicles
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CSAE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
        October 2021
        660 pages
        ISBN:9781450389853
        DOI:10.1145/3487075

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 December 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate368of770submissions,48%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format