skip to main content
10.1145/3487075.3487180acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analysis of Frequency Domain Characteristics of Crosstalk for Train Network Control Communication Cable

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Aiming at crosstalk problem of communication cable in train network control, mechanism of crosstalk generation is analyzed based on multi-conductor transmission lines (MTL) theory, and calculation method of distributed parameter of shielding cable in homogeneous dielectric is given. Frequency domain method of generalized two-port network is used. Frequency domain solution of the coupling response in the cable terminal is derived by solving shielded twisted pair (STP) chain-parameter matrix. Finally, influence factors of crosstalk is simulated. The results show that crosstalk is inversely proportional to the distance between lines and is directly proportional to the height from the ground and the coupling length, and the amplitude of variation increases significantly when the frequency is greater than 80MHz. For shielding layer, double-end grounding has the strongest anti interference ability. Single-end grounding has a significant inhibitory effect on low frequency interference, but has limited suppression of high-frequency interference. Double-end floating has a worse anti interference effect.

References

  1. Xie Lifeng, Lv Jifang, Jiang Zhongcheng, (2016). Simulation analysis and test verification of subway cable crosstalk[J]. Urban Mass Transit, 5: 78-82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Li Kangxu, Li Donghui, Li Changxian, (2020). Research on Simulation and Electromagnetic Compatibility of External Traction to Electromagnetic Radiation of Train Traction Converter[J]. Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University, 40(1), 110-115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. He Xiaodong (2016). Research on electromagnetic compatibility of EMU cable coupling[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhang Lu (2011). Research on the crosstalk mechanism of shielded cables of EMUs[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yu Dinghua, Wang Yimin (2005). Research on anti-electromagnetic interference of locomotive cables [J]. Locomotive Electric Drive, 6: 32-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhang Hongjiang, Wu Donghua, Zhang An (2011). Design technology of electromagnetic compatibility for rail vehicles[J]. Locomotive Electric Drive, 3: 61-76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. An Zhanyang (2015). Research on the prediction of automobile wiring harness crosstalk and its dynamic characteristics[D]. Jilin: Jilin University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shan Qin (2013). Research on key technologies of electromagnetic compatibility for high-speed EMUs[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang Gang (2009). Research on the coupling mechanism of space transient electromagnetic field to shielded cable[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Paul C R, Feather A E (1976). Computation of the Transmission Line Inductance and Capacitance Matrices from the Generalized Capacitance Matrix[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 18(4),175-183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Paul C R (1981). Computation of cross-talk in a multi-conductor Transmission Line[J]. IEEE Trans EMC, 23(4), 352-358Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sun Yaxiu, Zhuo Qingkun, Jiang Qinghui, (2015). Research on a new type of crosstalk model of differential mode excitation based on multi-conductor transmission line theory[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 64(4),1-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Paul C R (2007). Analysis of Multiconductor Transmission Lines[M]. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Liu Jianqiang, Zheng Qionglin, Zhang Yongfeng, (2010). Research on the electrical characteristics of the transmission medium of the CRH3 EMU train network[J]. Locomotive Electric Drive, 6: 7-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Analysis of Frequency Domain Characteristics of Crosstalk for Train Network Control Communication Cable
                Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Other conferences
                  CSAE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
                  October 2021
                  660 pages
                  ISBN:9781450389853
                  DOI:10.1145/3487075

                  Copyright © 2021 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 7 December 2021

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article
                  • Research
                  • Refereed limited

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate368of770submissions,48%
                • Article Metrics

                  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
                  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

                  Other Metrics

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader

                HTML Format

                View this article in HTML Format .

                View HTML Format